Paper · 2017 · Journal of Plant Interactions

Effects of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria application on soil phosphorus availability in coal mining subsidence area in Shanxi

Xiao-Kai Shi; Juan-Juan Ma; Li-Jun Liu

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) application on phosphorus (P) availability in reclaimed soil in coal mining subsidence region was investigated. Seven treatments were carried out including control, chicken manure (CM), PSB, PSB + tricalcium phosphate (TCP), CM + TCP, PSB + ground phosphate rock (GPR) and CM + GPR. The results showed soil Olsen-P concentration and phosphatase level as well as the yield of pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) were significantly higher in PSB application treatments compared to the corresponding CM application treatments. Soil phosphatase, invertase and urease contents were increased most significantly in PSB treatment, 1.18-, 1.31- and 2.32-fold higher than those in the control, respectively. Soil Ca2-P, Ca8-P, Fe-P and Al-P concentrations exhibited the greatest increases in PSB + TCP treatment, while occluded-P showed minor changes in different treatments. Application of PSB fertilizer reduced the transformation of Olsen-P to Ca10-P, thus increasing P availability in reclaimed soil of coal mining subsidence area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB application treatments increased soil Olsen-P concentration, phosphatase level, and pakchoi yield relative to CM treatments.

Taxon
pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.)Brassica rapa subsp. chinensise0
Treatment
PSB application treatmentse0
Outcome
soil Olsen-P concentration and phosphatase level as well as the yield of pakchoie0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
corresponding CM application treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis · Taxonおむこさん志望 · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil Olsen-P concentration and phosphatase level as well as the yield of pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) were significantly higher in PSB application treatments compared to the corresponding CM application treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB treatment increased soil phosphatase, invertase, and urease contents by 1.18-, 1.31-, and 2.32-fold, respectively.

Taxon
pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.)Brassica rapa subsp. chinensise1
Treatment
PSB treatmente0
Outcome
Soil phosphatase, invertase and urease contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis · Taxonおむこさん志望 · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil phosphatase, invertase and urease contents were increased most significantly in PSB treatment, 1.18-, 1.31- and 2.32-fold higher than those in the control, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–745 · show in text ↑
e1

“pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–458 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.