Paper · 2017 · Journal of Insect Science

Population Growth Parameters of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant Using Organic Substrate and Biofertilizers

P. Mohamadi; J. Razmjou; B. Naseri; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) is a devastating pest associated with tomato. In this study, effects of tomato plants treated with vermicompost (20, 40, and 60%), humic fertilizer (2, 4 and 6 g/kg soil) and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis) were investigated on the life table parameters of T. absoluta in a growth chamber at 25 ± 2 °C, 65 ± 5% RH, and 16:8 (L:D) h. Significant differences were found for the total developmental time, fecundity, and oviposition period of T. absoluta on the treatments tested. The net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm), finite rate of increase (λ), mean generation time (T), and doubling time (DT) of T. absoluta were significantly different among treatments tested. We found that in all vermicompost, humic fertilizer and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria treatments, values of R0, rm, and λ were lower than control treatment. However, the lowest values of these parameters were obtained on 2 g/kg humic fertilizer and 40% vermicompost. Furthermore, T. absoluta had longest T and DT values on 2 g/kg humic fertilizer treatment. Data obtained showed that the addition of 2 g/kg humic fertilizer and 40% vermicompost to the growing soil reduced T. absoluta populations in tomato cultures. In addition, these levels of fertilizers improved growth parameters of tomato seedlings (plant height, wet weight, and dry weight) compared with other treatments. These results could be useful in improving the sustainable management of the moth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Developmental time, fecundity and oviposition period of Tuta absoluta differed significantly among treatments.

Treatment
treatments testede0
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
total developmental time, fecundity, and oviposition period of T. absolutae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were found for the total developmental time, fecundity, and oviposition period of T. absoluta on the treatments tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reproductive and population growth parameters of Tuta absoluta differed significantly among treatments.

Treatment
treatments testede0
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm), finite rate of increase (λ)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net reproductive rate (R0), intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm), finite rate of increase (λ), mean generation time (T), and doubling time (DT) of T. absoluta were significantly different among treatments tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean generation and doubling times of Tuta absoluta differed significantly among treatments.

Treatment
treatments testede0
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
mean generation time (T), and doubling time (DT) of T. absolutae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean generation time (T), and doubling time (DT) of T. absoluta were significantly different among treatments tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All vermicompost treatments lowered Tuta absoluta R0, rm and λ compared with control.

Treatment
vermicomposte0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
values of R0, rm, and λe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in all vermicompost, humic fertilizer and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria treatments, values of R0, rm, and λ were lower than control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All humic fertilizer treatments lowered Tuta absoluta R0, rm and λ compared with control.

Treatment
humic fertilizere0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
values of R0, rm, and λe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in all vermicompost, humic fertilizer and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria treatments, values of R0, rm, and λ were lower than control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria treatments lowered Tuta absoluta R0, rm and λ compared with control.

Treatment
plant growth promoting rhizobacteriae0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
values of R0, rm, and λe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in all vermicompost, humic fertilizer and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria treatments, values of R0, rm, and λ were lower than control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest Tuta absoluta R0, rm and λ values occurred with 2 g/kg humic fertilizer.

Treatment
2 g/kg humic fertilizere0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
lowest values of these parameterse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest values of these parameters were obtained on 2 g/kg humic fertilizer and 40% vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest Tuta absoluta R0, rm and λ values occurred with 40% vermicompost.

Treatment
40% vermicomposte0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
lowest values of these parameterse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest values of these parameters were obtained on 2 g/kg humic fertilizer and 40% vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuta absoluta had the longest generation and doubling times with 2 g/kg humic fertilizer.

Treatment
2 g/kg humic fertilizere0
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
T. absoluta had longest T and DT valuese0
Direction
longeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. absoluta had longest T and DT values on 2 g/kg humic fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2 g/kg humic fertilizer reduced Tuta absoluta populations in tomato.

Treatment
2 g/kg humic fertilizere0
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
T. absoluta populationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of 2 g/kg humic fertilizer and 40% vermicompost to the growing soil reduced T. absoluta populations in tomato cultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40% vermicompost reduced Tuta absoluta populations in tomato.

Treatment
40% vermicomposte0
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
T. absoluta populationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of 2 g/kg humic fertilizer and 40% vermicompost to the growing soil reduced T. absoluta populations in tomato cultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2 g/kg humic fertilizer improved tomato seedling height, wet weight and dry weight relative to other treatments.

Treatment
2 g/kg humic fertilizere1
Outcome
plant height, wet weight, and dry weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these levels of fertilizers improved growth parameters of tomato seedlings (plant height, wet weight, and dry weight) compared with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“the addition of 2 g/kg humic fertilizer and 40% vermicompost to the growing soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40% vermicompost improved tomato seedling height, wet weight and dry weight relative to other treatments.

Treatment
40% vermicomposte1
Outcome
plant height, wet weight, and dry weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these levels of fertilizers improved growth parameters of tomato seedlings (plant height, wet weight, and dry weight) compared with other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“the addition of 2 g/kg humic fertilizer and 40% vermicompost to the growing soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1267 · show in text ↑

fertilization · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 157 positive, 18 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

inoculation · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.