Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of 1-Methylcyclopropene and Polyhexamethylene Guanidine on Postharvest Quality of Banana (Musa paradisiaca) cv. Yelakki

S.B. Gouri H.C. Krishna; T.H. Shankarappa K.N. Sreenivas; G.K. Sadananda D.V. Sudhakar Rao; et al.

20
claims
60
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A study was undertaken to manage two factors that are responsible for reduced market value in banana cv. Yelakki namely ethylene biosynthesis and microbial deterioration. Freshly harvested stage 2 banana fruits treated with chemicals, 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and poly hexa methylene guanidine (PHMG) at different concentrations and stored in corrugated fiber board boxes at ambient condition for 15 days. The fruits treated with combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%) showed lower fruit respiration rate (0.02-0.15mg CO2 kg-1 h-1), lower PLW (3.89-18.83%) and low decay loss (16.54%). This treatment was also found to have components such as chlorophyll content, firmness, ascorbic acid, total soluble solids, total sugars and pectin, mineral contents viz. calcium, magnesium and potassium on higher side at the end of 15 days storage. Regression studies of the experiment showed a positive and significant association with ripening rate (0.43), colour change (0.56), PLW (0.85), moisture (0.16), TSS (0.49), total sugars (0.62), pectin (0.43), calcium (0.35), potassium (0.29) and decay loss (0.64) and it was negative for firmness (-0.29) and ascorbic acid (-0.15). The treated fruits showed significantly higher shelf life of 15 days however, the scores of sensory analysis viz. colour, taste, texture, flavor and overall acceptability were poor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana fruits treated with 1-MCP (20 ppm) plus PHMG (2.0%) had lower fruit respiration rate, 0.02-0.15 mg CO2 kg-1 h-1.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)e0
Outcome
fruit respiration ratee1
Direction
lowere1
Value
0.02-0.15mg CO2 kg-1 h-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fruits treated with combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–479 · show in text ↑
e1

“lower fruit respiration rate (0.02-0.15mg CO2 kg-1 h-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits treated with 1-MCP (20 ppm) plus PHMG (2.0%) had lower physiological loss in weight (PLW), 3.89-18.83%.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)e0
Outcome
PLWe1
Direction
lowere1
Value
3.89-18.83%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fruits treated with combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–479 · show in text ↑
e1

“lower PLW (3.89-18.83%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits treated with 1-MCP (20 ppm) plus PHMG (2.0%) had low decay loss, 16.54%.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)e0
Outcome
decay losse1
Direction
lowe1
Value
16.54%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fruits treated with combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–479 · show in text ↑
e1

“low decay loss (16.54%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave higher chlorophyll content, firmness and ascorbic acid at the end of 15 days storage.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, firmness, ascorbic acide1
Direction
higher sidee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fruits treated with combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–479 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll content, firmness, ascorbic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–698 · show in text ↑
e2

“on higher side at the end of 15 days storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave higher total soluble solids, total sugars and pectin at the end of 15 days storage.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)e0
Outcome
total soluble solids, total sugars and pectine1
Direction
higher sidee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fruits treated with combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–479 · show in text ↑
e1

“total soluble solids, total sugars and pectin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–745 · show in text ↑
e2

“on higher side at the end of 15 days storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave higher calcium, magnesium and potassium contents at the end of 15 days storage.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)e0
Outcome
calcium, magnesium and potassiume1
Direction
higher sidee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fruits treated with combination of 1-MCP (20 ppm) and PHMG (2.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–479 · show in text ↑
e1

“calcium, magnesium and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–801 · show in text ↑
e2

“on higher side at the end of 15 days storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated fruits had a significantly higher shelf life of 15 days.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
highere0
Value
15 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The treated fruits showed significantly higher shelf life of 15 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensory scores for colour, taste, texture, flavor and overall acceptability of treated fruits were poor.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
scores of sensory analysise0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the scores of sensory analysis viz. colour, taste, texture, flavor and overall acceptability were poor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a positive and significant association for ripening rate in banana, value 0.43.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
ripening ratee0
Value
0.43e0
Qualifier
positive and significant associatione1

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“ripening rate (0.43)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–956 · show in text ↑
e1

“a positive and significant association with”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a positive and significant association for colour change in banana, value 0.56.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
colour changee0
Value
0.56e0
Qualifier
positive and significant associatione1

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“colour change (0.56)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“a positive and significant association with”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a positive and significant association for PLW in banana, value 0.85.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
PLWe0
Value
0.85e0
Qualifier
positive and significant associatione1

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“PLW (0.85)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“a positive and significant association with”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a positive and significant association for moisture in banana, value 0.16.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
moisturee0
Value
0.16e0
Qualifier
positive and significant associatione1

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“moisture (0.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“a positive and significant association with”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a positive and significant association for TSS in banana, value 0.49.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
TSSe0
Value
0.49e0
Qualifier
positive and significant associatione1

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“TSS (0.49)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“a positive and significant association with”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a positive and significant association for total sugars in banana, value 0.62.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Value
0.62e0
Qualifier
positive and significant associatione1

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“total sugars (0.62)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1040 · show in text ↑
e1

“a positive and significant association with”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a positive and significant association for pectin in banana, value 0.43.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
pectine0
Value
0.43e0
Qualifier
positive and significant associatione1

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“pectin (0.43)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1055 · show in text ↑
e1

“a positive and significant association with”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a positive and significant association for calcium in banana, value 0.35.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
calciume0
Value
0.35e0
Qualifier
positive and significant associatione1

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“calcium (0.35)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1071 · show in text ↑
e1

“a positive and significant association with”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a positive and significant association for potassium in banana, value 0.29.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
potassiume0
Value
0.29e0
Qualifier
positive and significant associatione1

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“potassium (0.29)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1089 · show in text ↑
e1

“a positive and significant association with”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a positive and significant association for decay loss in banana, value 0.64.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
decay losse0
Value
0.64e0
Qualifier
positive and significant associatione1

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“decay loss (0.64)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1111 · show in text ↑
e1

“a positive and significant association with”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a negative association for firmness in banana, value -0.29.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Value
-0.29e0
Qualifier
negativee0

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“it was negative for firmness (-0.29)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1152 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression showed a negative association for ascorbic acid in banana, value -0.15.

Taxon
Bananat0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Value
-0.15e0
Qualifier
negativee1

Not reportedDirection

Schema note from the model: association target is not stated in the abstract

Verbatim

t0

“Banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“and ascorbic acid (-0.15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“it was negative for”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1135 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · MusaResults differ

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · nutrient: content · MusaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: pigments · MusaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · disease · MusaPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · MusaPositive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

guanidine · quality: postharvest · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: respiration · MusaResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.