Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Integrated Nutrient Management for Improving, Fertilizer Use Efficiency, Soil Biodiversity and Productivity of Wheat in Irrigated Rice Wheat Cropping System in Indo-Gangatic Plains of India

Suresh Kumar Kakraliya; R.D. Jat; Sandeep Kumar; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2011-12 and 2012-13at C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur to find out the combined effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on grain yield, fertilizer use efficiency and grain quality of wheat crop. The treatments were -Control (T1), RDF (150:60:40 NPK Kg/ha) (T2),125% RDF (T3), RDF + Vermicompost (VC) at 2.5 t/ha (T4), RDF + VC at 5t/ha (T5), RDF + FYM at 5t/ha (T6), RDF + FYM at 10t/ha (T7), RDF + VC at 2.5 t/ha + Azotobacter (T8), RDF + FYM at 5t/ha + Azotobacter (T9), and RDF + VC at 2.5 t/ha + FYM at 5 t/ha + Azotobacter (T10). Result showed that the treatment T10 produced higher grain yield than the other treatments. The higher yield led to higher NPK uptake by wheat. Further, the available NPK and organic carbon (%) content of soil also increased with integration of organic and inorganic fertilizer along with bio-fertilizer strain over control. Different fertilizer- use efficiencies were significantly improved with the application of manures, chemical fertilizers and bio-fertilizer over control as well as chemical fertilizer alone. All the fertilizer use efficiency was maximum in treatment T10followed by treatment T9 and the minimum value was quantified in T3, T2, T1 (control). The highest grain protein content was obtained from the application of organic and inorganic fertilizer along with azotobacter and lowest from control as well as NPK fertilizer alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 produced the highest wheat grain yield among the treatments.

Treatment
RDF + VC at 2.5 t/ha + FYM at 5 t/ha + Azotobactere1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Result showed that the treatment T10 produced higher grain yield than the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–711 · show in text ↑
e1

“RDF + VC at 2.5 t/ha + FYM at 5 t/ha + Azotobacter (T10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–116 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher wheat yield was accompanied by higher NPK uptake.

Outcome
NPK uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
higher yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher yield led to higher NPK uptake by wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated organic, inorganic and biofertilizer raised soil available NPK and organic carbon over control.

Treatment
integration of organic and inorganic fertilizer along with bio-fertilizer straine0
Outcome
available NPK and organic carbon (%) content of soile0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the available NPK and organic carbon (%) content of soil also increased with integration of organic and inorganic fertilizer along with bio-fertilizer strain over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manures, chemical fertilizers and biofertilizer significantly improved wheat fertilizer-use efficiencies over control and chemical fertilizer alone.

Treatment
application of manures, chemical fertilizers and bio-fertilizere0
Outcome
fertilizer- use efficienciese0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
control as well as chemical fertilizer alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different fertilizer- use efficiencies were significantly improved with the application of manures, chemical fertilizers and bio-fertilizer over control as well as chemical fertilizer alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 had maximum fertilizer-use efficiency, followed by T9, while T3, T2 and control had the lowest values.

Outcome
fertilizer use efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the fertilizer use efficiency was maximum in treatment T10followed by treatment T9 and the minimum value was quantified in T3, T2, T1 (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and inorganic fertilizer with Azotobacter gave the highest grain protein content.

Treatment
application of organic and inorganic fertilizer along with azotobactere0
Interactor
azotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
control as well as NPK fertilizer alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain protein content was obtained from the application of organic and inorganic fertilizer along with azotobacter and lowest from control as well as NPK fertilizer alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Productivity of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–116 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

88 papers: 87 positive, 1 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 44 positive, 5 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · Azotobacter · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.