Paper · 2015 · Acta Horticulturae

EFFICIENT IN VITRO PROPAGATION AND ROOTING OF ADULT EXPLANTS OF CITRUS ROOTSTOCKS

Carlos I. Tallón; Fernando Córdoba; Ignacio Porras; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of the basal medium and different plant growth regulators on the efficient micropropagation of nodal explants from mature trees of sour orange and ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin citrus rootstocks was studied. The preference of the two citrus rootstock shoot cultures for high-salt media, like MS or DKW, was observed. Several combinations of BA and AD, KIN or GA were made in an attempt to optimize the proliferation phase. The addition of BA and AD to the culture medium improved the proliferation in sour orange or ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin in the same way as BA/GA. The use of different combinations of BA/KIN did not improve any of the studied variables. The transfer of in vitro shoots to rooting media, containing different concentrations of IBA and IAA, produced complete plantlets of ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin, but very low rooting percentages in sour orange were obtained. To improve the rooting results, different combinations of NAA and IBA were tested and higher rooting percentages than in the IBA/IAA combinations were produced. In sour orange nearly 100% of rooted explants were obtained.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both citrus rootstock shoot cultures preferred high-salt MS or DKW media.

Taxon
CITRUSCitrust0
Treatment
high-salt media, like MS or DKWe0
Outcome
preferencee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The preference of the two citrus rootstock shoot cultures for high-salt media, like MS or DKW, was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–320 · show in text ↑
t0

“CITRUS ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA and AD improved proliferation in sour orange.

Taxon
sour orangeCitrus ×aurantiume0
Treatment
BA and ADe0
Outcome
proliferatione0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
BA/GAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantium
Citrus ×aurantium · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of BA and AD to the culture medium improved the proliferation in sour orange or ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin in the same way as BA/GA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA and AD improved proliferation in Cleopatra mandarin.

Taxon
‘Cleopatra’ mandarine0
Treatment
BA and ADe0
Outcome
proliferatione0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
BA/GAe0

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of BA and AD to the culture medium improved the proliferation in sour orange or ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin in the same way as BA/GA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA/KIN combinations did not improve the studied variables.

Taxon
CITRUSCitrust0
Treatment
different combinations of BA/KINe0
Outcome
studied variablese0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of different combinations of BA/KIN did not improve any of the studied variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“CITRUS ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA and IAA rooting media produced complete Cleopatra mandarin plantlets.

Taxon
‘Cleopatra’ mandarine0
Treatment
rooting media, containing different concentrations of IBA and IAAe0
Outcome
complete plantletse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The transfer of in vitro shoots to rooting media, containing different concentrations of IBA and IAA, produced complete plantlets of ‘Cleopatra’ mandarin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA and IAA rooting media gave very low rooting in sour orange.

Taxon
sour orangeCitrus ×aurantiume0
Outcome
rooting percentagese0
Direction
very lowe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantium
Citrus ×aurantium · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“very low rooting percentages in sour orange were obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“CITRUS ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA and IBA combinations gave higher rooting than IBA and IAA combinations.

Taxon
CITRUSCitrust0
Treatment
different combinations of NAA and IBAe0
Outcome
rooting percentagese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
IBA/IAA combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different combinations of NAA and IBA were tested and higher rooting percentages than in the IBA/IAA combinations were produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“CITRUS ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nearly all sour orange explants rooted under the improved rooting approach.

Taxon
sour orangeCitrus ×aurantiume0
Outcome
rooted explantse0
Value
nearly 100%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantium
Citrus ×aurantium · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In sour orange nearly 100% of rooted explants were obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1096 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · CitrusPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · CitrusPositive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

in vitro · pest · CitrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.