Paper · 2013 · Acta Horticulturae

EFFECTIVENESS OF UV-C IRRADIATION ON GROWTH OF POST-INOCULATED LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES ON FRESH-CUT BROCCOLI

G.R. Gamage; J. Wargent; J.S. Palmer; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) light irradiation has demonstrated positive effects as a postharvest treatment in prolonging the storage life of fresh produce and as a non-thermal method of inactivation of pathogenic microorganisms. The objective of this research was to study the effectiveness of UV-C light irradiation as a postharvest treatment on the subsequent attachment and growth of human pathogens on fresh produce. Fresh-cut broccoli is highly perishable and susceptible to deterioration and contamination by pathogenic microorganisms after harvest. Fresh-cut broccoli branchlets were treated with UV-C doses of 2.5 and 5 kJ/m2 and inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes at various times (0, 6 and 24 h) after treatment. Growth of the bacteria on UV-C treated surfaces of broccoli branchlets was evaluated by extracting and enumerating the microorganisms on day 3, 4, 6, and 8 after treatment. Results of the study show UV-C irradiation at a dose of 5 kJ/m2 was able to restrict the growth of L. monocytogenes in the samples inoculated 24 h post treatment, with no significant differences (P=0.05) in colour and weight loss of the broccoli compared to the control treatments. These results imply UV-C treatment may be effective not just in controlling pre-existing pathogens but also reducing the risk of post-harvest contamination. Previous studies have suggested that mild stress produced by UV-C light irradiation stimulates the synthesis of defence related phytochemicals in broccoli (such as glucosinolates) which also offer a variety of health benefits. It is not yet clear whether this mechanism is also responsible for the restriction of L. monocytogenes attachment and growth after UV-C irradiation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C at 5 kJ/m2 restricted L. monocytogenes growth when inoculation occurred 24 h later.

Treatment
UV-C irradiation at a dose of 5 kJ/m2e0
Interactor
L. monocytogenesListeria monocytogenese0pathogen
Outcome
growth of L. monocytogenese0
Direction
restricte0
Qualifier
inoculated 24 h post treatmente0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Listeria monocytogenes
Listeria monocytogenes · InteractorElizabeth White · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of the study show UV-C irradiation at a dose of 5 kJ/m2 was able to restrict the growth of L. monocytogenes in the samples inoculated 24 h post treatment, with no significant differences (P=0.05) in colour and weight loss of the broccoli compared to the control treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“BROCCOLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C treatment produced no significant difference in broccoli colour relative to controls.

Treatment
UV-C irradiation at a dose of 5 kJ/m2e0
Outcome
coloure0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of the study show UV-C irradiation at a dose of 5 kJ/m2 was able to restrict the growth of L. monocytogenes in the samples inoculated 24 h post treatment, with no significant differences (P=0.05) in colour and weight loss of the broccoli compared to the control treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“BROCCOLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C treatment produced no significant difference in broccoli weight loss relative to controls.

Treatment
UV-C irradiation at a dose of 5 kJ/m2e0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of the study show UV-C irradiation at a dose of 5 kJ/m2 was able to restrict the growth of L. monocytogenes in the samples inoculated 24 h post treatment, with no significant differences (P=0.05) in colour and weight loss of the broccoli compared to the control treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“BROCCOLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest UV-C may reduce post-harvest contamination risk.

Treatment
UV-C treatmente0
Outcome
reducing the risk of post-harvest contaminatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results imply UV-C treatment may be effective not just in controlling pre-existing pathogens but also reducing the risk of post-harvest contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“BROCCOLI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–107 · show in text ↑

uv · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.