Paper · 2017 · Planta

Grapevine acclimation to water deficit: the adjustment of stomatal and hydraulic conductance differs from petiole embolism vulnerability

Uri Hochberg; Andrea Giulia Bonel; Rakefet David-Schwartz; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
67
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought-acclimated vines maintained higher gas exchange compared to irrigated controls under water deficit; this effect is associated with modified leaf turgor but not with improved petiole vulnerability to cavitation. A key feature for the prosperity of plants under changing environments is the plasticity of their hydraulic system. In the present research we studied the hydraulic regulation in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) that were first acclimated for 39 days to well-watered (WW), sustained water deficit (SD), or transient—cycles of dehydration–rehydration—water deficit (TD) conditions, and then subjected to varying degrees of drought. Vine development under SD led to the smallest leaves and petioles, but the TD vines had the smallest mean xylem vessel and calculated specific conductivity (k ts). Unexpectedly, both the water deficit acclimation treatments resulted in vines more vulnerable to cavitation in comparison to WW, possibly as a result of developmental differences or cavitation fatigue. When exposed to drought, the SD vines maintained the highest stomatal (g s) and leaf conductance (k leaf) under low stem water potential (Ψs), despite their high xylem vulnerability and in agreement with their lower turgor loss point (ΨTLP). These findings suggest that the down-regulation of k leaf and g s is not associated with embolism, and the ability of drought-acclimated vines to maintain hydraulic conductance and gas exchange under stressed conditions is more likely associated with the leaf turgor and membrane permeability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-acclimated vines maintained higher gas exchange than irrigated controls under water deficit.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
gas exchangee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
irrigated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought-acclimated vines maintained higher gas exchange compared to irrigated controls under water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–428 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gas exchange effect of drought acclimation is associated with modified leaf turgor.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
water deficite0
Outcome
leaf turgore0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought-acclimated vines maintained higher gas exchange compared to irrigated controls under water deficit; this effect is associated with modified leaf turgor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vines under sustained water deficit (SD) had the smallest leaves and petioles.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
SDe2
Outcome
leaves and petiolese2
Direction
smalleste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Vine development under SD led to the smallest leaves and petioles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–713 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transient water deficit (TD) vines had the smallest mean xylem vessel and calculated specific conductivity.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
TDe2
Outcome
mean xylem vessel and calculated specific conductivitye2
Direction
smalleste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the TD vines had the smallest mean xylem vessel and calculated specific conductivity (k ts)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both water deficit acclimation treatments made vines more vulnerable to cavitation than well-watered (WW) vines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
water deficit acclimation treatmentse3
Outcome
more vulnerable to cavitatione3
Direction
more vulnerablee3
Comparator
WWe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“both the water deficit acclimation treatments resulted in vines more vulnerable to cavitation in comparison to WW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–939 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, SD vines maintained the highest stomatal and leaf conductance.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
SDe4
Outcome
stomatal (g s) and leaf conductance (k leaf)e4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the SD vines maintained the highest stomatal (g s) and leaf conductance (k leaf)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1119 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SD vines had a lower turgor loss point.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
SDe5
Outcome
turgor loss pointe6
Direction
lowere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the SD vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1051 · show in text ↑
e6

“in agreement with their lower turgor loss point”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–428 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Down-regulation of leaf conductance is not associated with embolism.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
leafe2
Outcome
down-regulation of k leaf and g se2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the down-regulation of k leaf and g s is not associated with embolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1353 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–428 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Maintenance of hydraulic conductance and gas exchange under stress is more likely associated with leaf turgor and membrane permeability than with embolism.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Outcome
hydraulic conductance and gas exchangee6
Qualifier
leaf turgor and membrane permeabilitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“the ability of drought-acclimated vines to maintain hydraulic conductance and gas exchange under stressed conditions is more likely associated with the leaf turgor and membrane permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1548 · show in text ↑
e1

“grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–428 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.