Paper · 2017 · Zemdirbyste-Agriculture

Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection

Sylwia Andruszczak

14
claims
45
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits (Zeleny sedimentation value and the contents of protein, gluten, starch, carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin and amino acids) of eight winter spelt cultivars as influenced by the tillage system (conventional and reduced tillage) and chemical plant protection (application of two herbicides: Mustang 306 SE and Attribut 70 WG, a fungicide Alert 375 SC and a growth regulator Stabilan 750 SL). Plots without the use of plant protection chemicals were the control treatment. Yield and chemical composition of spelt grain were most dependent on the genetic determinants of the individual cultivar, but it is possible to affect yield quantity and quality through agronomic factors. The highest grain yields were produced by the cultivars 'Badengold', 'Ceralio', 'Frankenkorn' and 'Ostro', while in terms of grain quality the most valuable were cvs. 'Ceralio' and 'Ostro'. Under the conditions of reduced tillage system, the spelt grain yields were significantly lower than under the conventional tillage, but the evaluated cultivars responded differently to this factor. The highest reduction in yield compared to conventional soil tillage was found for the cvs. 'Oberkulmer Rotkorn', 'Spelt I.N.Z.' and 'Schwabenkorn', while the lowest one for cv. 'Ceralio'. On the other hand, the ploughless tillage contributed to a significant increase in Zeleny sedimentation value as well as in grain protein and gluten content, whereas the starch content decreased. At the same time, the grain amino acid content was at a similar level under both tillage systems. Chemical plant protection significantly increased the Zeleny sedimentation value and the grain protein content. The number of ears per 1 m 2 and grain yields also increased and the highest yield increase compared to the treatment without chemical plant protection products was achieved by the cvs. 'Schwabenkorn', 'Spelt I.N.Z.' and 'Frankenkorn'.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spelt grain yield and chemical composition depended most on the cultivar genetics, though agronomic factors can affect them.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Material
individual cultivare1
Outcome
Yield and chemical composition of spelt graine1
Qualifier
most dependent on the genetic determinants of the individual cultivare1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield and chemical composition of spelt grain were most dependent on the genetic determinants of the individual cultivar, but it is possible to affect yield quantity and quality through agronomic factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–770 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields were highest for the cultivars Badengold, Ceralio, Frankenkorn and Ostro.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Material
'Badengold', 'Ceralio', 'Frankenkorn' and 'Ostro'e2
Outcome
grain yieldse2
Direction
higheste2
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest grain yields were produced by the cultivars 'Badengold', 'Ceralio', 'Frankenkorn' and 'Ostro'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain quality was most valuable in the cultivars Ceralio and Ostro.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Material
'Ceralio' and 'Ostro'e3
Outcome
grain qualitye3
Direction
most valuablee3
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“in terms of grain quality the most valuable were cvs. 'Ceralio' and 'Ostro'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under reduced tillage, spelt grain yields were significantly lower than under conventional tillage.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Treatment
reduced tillage systeme4
Outcome
spelt grain yieldse4
Direction
significantly lowere4
Comparator
conventional tillagee4
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under the conditions of reduced tillage system, the spelt grain yields were significantly lower than under the conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest yield reduction under reduced tillage compared with conventional tillage was in the cultivars Oberkulmer Rotkorn, Spelt I.N.Z. and Schwabenkorn.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Material
'Oberkulmer Rotkorn', 'Spelt I.N.Z.' and 'Schwabenkorn'e5
Treatment
reduced tillage systeme6
Outcome
reduction in yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Comparator
conventional soil tillagee5
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest reduction in yield compared to conventional soil tillage was found for the cvs. 'Oberkulmer Rotkorn', 'Spelt I.N.Z.' and 'Schwabenkorn'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1308 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under the conditions of reduced tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The smallest yield reduction under reduced tillage compared with conventional tillage was in the cultivar Ceralio.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Material
'Ceralio'e7
Treatment
reduced tillage systeme6
Outcome
reduction in yielde5
Direction
loweste7
Comparator
conventional soil tillagee5
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest reduction in yield compared to conventional soil tillage was found for the cvs. 'Oberkulmer Rotkorn', 'Spelt I.N.Z.' and 'Schwabenkorn'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1308 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under the conditions of reduced tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1008 · show in text ↑
e7

“while the lowest one for cv. 'Ceralio'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughless tillage significantly increased Zeleny sedimentation value, grain protein and gluten content of spelt.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Treatment
ploughless tillagee1
Outcome
Zeleny sedimentation value as well as in grain protein and gluten contente1
Direction
significant increasee1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“On the other hand, the ploughless tillage contributed to a significant increase in Zeleny sedimentation value as well as in grain protein and gluten content, whereas the starch content decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughless tillage decreased spelt grain starch content.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Treatment
ploughless tillagee1
Outcome
starch contente1
Direction
decreasede1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“On the other hand, the ploughless tillage contributed to a significant increase in Zeleny sedimentation value as well as in grain protein and gluten content, whereas the starch content decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain amino acid content of spelt was at a similar level under both tillage systems.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Treatment
tillage systemse1
Outcome
grain amino acid contente1
Direction
similar levele1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the same time, the grain amino acid content was at a similar level under both tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical plant protection significantly increased Zeleny sedimentation value and grain protein content of spelt.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Treatment
Chemical plant protectione1
Outcome
the Zeleny sedimentation value and the grain protein contente1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chemical plant protection significantly increased the Zeleny sedimentation value and the grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical plant protection increased the number of ears per 1 m 2 and grain yields of spelt compared with no protection.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Treatment
chemical plant protectione1
Outcome
number of ears per 1 m 2 and grain yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
treatment without chemical plant protection productse1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of ears per 1 m 2 and grain yields also increased and the highest yield increase compared to the treatment without chemical plant protection products was achieved by the cvs. 'Schwabenkorn', 'Spelt I.N.Z.' and 'Frankenkorn'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yield increase from chemical plant protection was in the cultivars Schwabenkorn, Spelt I.N.Z. and Frankenkorn.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Material
'Schwabenkorn', 'Spelt I.N.Z.' and 'Frankenkorn'e1
Treatment
chemical plant protectione1
Outcome
yield increasee1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
treatment without chemical plant protection productse1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of ears per 1 m 2 and grain yields also increased and the highest yield increase compared to the treatment without chemical plant protection products was achieved by the cvs. 'Schwabenkorn', 'Spelt I.N.Z.' and 'Frankenkorn'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1990 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield quantity and quality of spelt are possible to affect through agronomic factors.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Treatment
agronomic factorse1
Outcome
yield quantity and qualitye1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield and chemical composition of spelt grain were most dependent on the genetic determinants of the individual cultivar, but it is possible to affect yield quantity and quality through agronomic factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–770 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The evaluated spelt cultivars responded differently to reduced tillage.

Taxon
winter speltTriticum speltat0
Material
the evaluated cultivarse1
Outcome
responded differently to this factore1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum spelta
Triticum spelta · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Reaction of winter spelt cultivars to reduced tillage system and chemical plant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“A three-factor field experiment evaluated grain yield, yield components and some grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“the evaluated cultivars responded differently to this factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1159 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Triticum spelta (spelt)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.