Paper · 1999 · HortScience

246 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal (AMF) Colonization of Carica papaya `Waimanalo' Grown in Composted Landscape Yard Trimmings

Chris A. Martin; L. Brooke McDowell; Thomas E. Marler; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Seedlings of Carica papaya L. `Waimanalo' (papaya) were transplanted into 27-L containers filled with nonsterile composted landscape yard trimmings passed through a 1.3-cm screen. At transplanting, papaya plants were inoculated with either one of three different AMF communities or were not inoculated as control plants. Two of the AMF communities were from Arizona citrus orchards, and one AMF community was from an undisturbed western Chihuahuan Desert soil. After transplanting, papaya plants were grown for 4 months under well-watered conditions in a temperature-controlled (32 °C day/24 °C night) glasshouse (45% light exclusion). Control plants remained non-mycorrhizal. Total colonization of papaya roots by AMF communities ranged from 56% to 94%. Depending on mycorrhizal treatment, AMF arbuscules and internal hyphae were present in 30% to 60% and 20% to 24% of roots, respectively. Noticeably absent in papaya roots were AMF vesicles. Papaya height, trunk diameter, and leaf phosphorus concentration were similar for inoculated and control plants. Compared with control plants, papayas inoculated with AMF communities had about 20% less shoot dry weight and about 50% less root dry weight. Under nonlimiting conditions in an organic substrate, AMF communities did not stimulate papaya growth but rather appeared to function as a carbon sink.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninoculated control papaya remained non-mycorrhizal.

Taxon
Carica papayaCarica papayat0
Outcome
non-mycorrhizale0
Comparator
Control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control plants remained non-mycorrhizal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carica papaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF root colonization ranged from 56% to 94%.

Taxon
papayaCarica papayae0
Interactor
AMF communitiese0symbiont
Outcome
Total colonization of papaya rootse0
Value
56% to 94%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total colonization of papaya roots by AMF communities ranged from 56% to 94%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–754 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF arbuscules occurred in 30% to 60% of papaya roots depending on treatment.

Taxon
Carica papayaCarica papayat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
AMF arbusculese0
Value
30% to 60%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on mycorrhizal treatment, AMF arbuscules and internal hyphae were present in 30% to 60% and 20% to 24% of roots, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carica papaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF internal hyphae occurred in 20% to 24% of roots depending on treatment.

Taxon
Carica papayaCarica papayat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
internal hyphaee0
Value
20% to 24%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on mycorrhizal treatment, AMF arbuscules and internal hyphae were present in 30% to 60% and 20% to 24% of roots, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carica papaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF vesicles were absent in papaya roots.

Taxon
papayaCarica papayae0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
absente0
Qualifier
AMF vesiclese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Noticeably absent in papaya roots were AMF vesicles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated and control papaya had similar height, trunk diameter and leaf phosphorus concentration.

Taxon
PapayaCarica papayae0
Treatment
inoculated with AMF communitiese1
Interactor
AMF communitiese1symbiont
Outcome
height, trunk diameter, and leaf phosphorus concentratione0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Papaya height, trunk diameter, and leaf phosphorus concentration were similar for inoculated and control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1057 · show in text ↑
e1

“papayas inoculated with AMF communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF-inoculated papaya had about 20% less shoot dry weight than controls.

Taxon
papayasCarica papayae0
Treatment
inoculated with AMF communitiese0
Interactor
AMF communitiese0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
lesse0
Value
about 20%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with control plants, papayas inoculated with AMF communities had about 20% less shoot dry weight and about 50% less root dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF-inoculated papaya had about 50% less root dry weight than controls.

Taxon
papayasCarica papayae0
Treatment
inoculated with AMF communitiese0
Interactor
AMF communitiese0symbiont
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
lesse0
Value
about 50%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with control plants, papayas inoculated with AMF communities had about 20% less shoot dry weight and about 50% less root dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1199 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nonlimiting conditions in organic substrate, AMF appeared to function as a carbon sink rather than stimulate papaya growth.

Taxon
papayaCarica papayae0
Interactor
AMF communitiese0symbiont
Outcome
papaya growthe0
Qualifier
appeared to function as a carbon sinke0
Setting
organic substratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under nonlimiting conditions in an organic substrate, AMF communities did not stimulate papaya growth but rather appeared to function as a carbon sink.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1351 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Carica papaya (papaya)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · growth · Carica papaya (papaya)Results differ

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.