Paper · 2015 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Proline, glycine betaine, total phenolics and pigment contents in response to osmotic stress in maize seedlings

SAJJAD MOHARRAMNEJAD; OMID SOFALIAN; MOSTAFA VALIZADEH; et al.

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
36
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

In order to evaluate the fresh weight, RWC, pigment content, total phenolics, proline and glycine betaine responses of maize inbred lines to osmotic stress, a factorial experiment was carried out under laboratory conditions with two maize inbred lines (B73 and MO17) and two osmotic stress levels induced by PEG (control and -0.6 MPa). Fresh weight significantly decreased under drought stress. On the basis of percent inhibition in fresh weight at the osmotic stress MO17 was ranked as tolerant (inhibition 45.30%), and B73 drought sensitive (inhibition more than 50%). Leaf relative water content (RWC) was significantly decreased in both inbred lines under osmotic stress. The pigment concentrations were substantially declined in both maize inbreds under osmotic stressed conditions. However, this reduction was less in B73 than MO17. Osmoitc stress declined the levels of total phenolics in both maize inbreds. On the other hand, the osmotic stress markedly enhanced the levels of proline and glycine betaine in both maize inbreds, but this was more pronounced in MO17. The present results showed that osmotic stress retards the growth and some biochemical attributes of maize inbreds. In conclusion, the level of proline and glycine betaine in maize could improve drought tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh weight decreased significantly under drought stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh weight significantly decreased under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–394 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MO17 was classified as tolerant based on 45.30% fresh weight inhibition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
MO17e0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Value
45.30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MO17 was ranked as tolerant (inhibition 45.30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B73 was classified as drought sensitive with more than 50% inhibition.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
B73e0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Value
more than 50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B73 drought sensitive (inhibition more than 50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf relative water content decreased significantly in both inbred lines under osmotic stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
Leaf relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf relative water content (RWC) was significantly decreased in both inbred lines under osmotic stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigment concentrations declined in both maize inbreds under osmotic stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
osmotic stressed conditionse0
Outcome
pigment concentrationse0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pigment concentrations were substantially declined in both maize inbreds under osmotic stressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–787 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigment reduction was less in B73 than MO17.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
B73e0
Outcome
pigment concentrationse1
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
MO17e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this reduction was less in B73 than MO17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–837 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigment concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolics declined in both maize inbreds under osmotic stress.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Osmoitc stresse0
Outcome
levels of total phenolicse0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Osmoitc stress declined the levels of total phenolics in both maize inbreds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline levels increased under osmotic stress in both inbreds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
levels of prolinee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the osmotic stress markedly enhanced the levels of proline and glycine betaine in both maize inbreds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycine betaine levels increased under osmotic stress in both inbreds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
osmotic stresse0
Outcome
glycine betainee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the osmotic stress markedly enhanced the levels of proline and glycine betaine in both maize inbreds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1035 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmolyte increases were more pronounced in MO17.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
MO17e0
Outcome
levels of proline and glycine betainee0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the osmotic stress markedly enhanced the levels of proline and glycine betaine in both maize inbreds, but this was more pronounced in MO17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1073 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that proline and glycine betaine levels could improve drought tolerance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Compound
proline and glycine betainee0
Outcome
drought tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the level of proline and glycine betaine in maize could improve drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1287 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 39 positive, 116 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

307 papers in the same direction as this paper · 77 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.