Paper · 2016 · Asian Journal of Plant Pathology

Efficacy of Some Nanoparticles to Control Damping-off and RootRot of Sugar Beet in El-Behiera Governorate

Eman El-Argawy; M.M.H. Rahhal; A. El-Korany; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to examine the potential antifungal activity and protective effect of some nanoparticles in controlling root rot disease of sugar beet. Magnesium oxide, titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles (MgO, TiO 2 and ZnO NPs) were investigated against three pathogenic fungi isolated from sugar beet roots, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp., betae, Sclerotium rolfsii and Rhizoctonia solani in vitro and under greenhouse conditions. Materials and Methods: Solutions of particles of MgO, TiO 2 and ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) were used in different concentrations in vitro to study the inhibition of fungal radial growth and by spraying fungal culture of the tested fungi to test the effect of nanoparticles on hyphal and spore formation and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used to visualize the effect of this application. Greenhouse experiment was conducted and sugar beet seeds (cv., Kawamera) were treated with the nanoparticles concentrations as seed dressing then seeds were planted in infested soil with the tested fungi. Disease assessment was evaluated, also the effect of nanoparticles on the vegetative and the chemical characteristics of sugar beet were examined. Results: Obtained results showed that the three NPs tested with concentrations investigated (25, 50 and 100 ppm) increased the in vitro fungal growth inhibition by reducing the radial fungal growth with the best effect was recorded with the highest concentration. Meanwhile, TiO 2 NP (100 ppm) showed the highest effect in decreasing mean radial growth by 77.25%. Also, TiO 2 showed 100% inhibition on sclerotia formation of Sclerotium rolfsii, while MgO was most effective and decreased sporulation (number of conidia) of Fusariun oxysporum f. sp., betae by 69.23%. The greenhouse experiment showed that the tested all tested NPs significantly decreased the developed root rot severity and TiO 2 was most effective and decreased it to 1.39% compared to 28.2% for the untreated. On the other hand, treatments with the tested NPs significantly increased root fresh weight (biomass) of the plants and also the dry weight compared to the untreated infested control. This was accompanied with an increase in sucrose and Total Soluble Solids (TSS) and also the total phenol content and activity of the defense related enzyme, polyphenol oxidase. Conclusion: Based on the obtained results the use of magnesium oxide, titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles could be a good and environmentally safe alternative of fungicides in controlling damping-off and root rot disease of sugar beet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three NPs at 25, 50 and 100 ppm increased in vitro inhibition of fungal radial growth, most strongly at the highest concentration.

Treatment
three NPse1
Outcome
in vitro fungal growth inhibitione1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
in vitroe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“the three NPs tested with concentrations investigated (25, 50 and 100 ppm) increased the in vitro fungal growth inhibition by reducing the radial fungal growth with the best effect was recorded with the highest concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 NP at 100 ppm decreased mean radial growth by 77.25%, the largest reduction among the NPs.

Treatment
TiO 2 NP (100 ppm)e2
Outcome
mean radial growthe2
Direction
decreasinge2
Value
77.25%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
e2

“TiO 2 NP (100 ppm) showed the highest effect in decreasing mean radial growth by 77.25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 showed 100% inhibition of sclerotia formation of Sclerotium rolfsii.

Treatment
TiO 2e3
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie3pathogen
Outcome
sclerotia formation of Sclerotium rolfsiie3
Direction
inhibitione3
Value
100%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
e3

“TiO 2 showed 100% inhibition on sclerotia formation of Sclerotium rolfsii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MgO was most effective and decreased sporulation of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. betae by 69.23%.

Treatment
MgOe4
Interactor
Fusariun oxysporum f. sp., betaee4pathogen
Outcome
sporulation (number of conidia) of Fusariun oxysporum f. sp., betaee4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
69.23%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
e4

“MgO was most effective and decreased sporulation (number of conidia) of Fusariun oxysporum f. sp., betae by 69.23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse, all tested NPs significantly decreased root rot severity on sugar beet.

Treatment
tested all tested NPse5
Outcome
developed root rot severitye5
Direction
decreasede5
Setting
greenhouse experimente5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“The greenhouse experiment showed that the tested all tested NPs significantly decreased the developed root rot severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 was the most effective NP, reducing root rot severity to 1.39% against 28.2% in untreated plants.

Treatment
TiO 2e6
Outcome
developed root rot severitye5
Direction
decreasede6
Value
1.39%e6
Qualifier
28.2%e6
Comparator
untreatede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“The greenhouse experiment showed that the tested all tested NPs significantly decreased the developed root rot severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1891 · show in text ↑
e6

“TiO 2 was most effective and decreased it to 1.39% compared to 28.2% for the untreated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–1982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NP treatments significantly increased root fresh and dry weight of sugar beet compared with the untreated infested control.

Organ / stage
roote7
Treatment
tested NPse7
Outcome
root fresh weight (biomass)e7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
untreated infested controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
e7

“treatments with the tested NPs significantly increased root fresh weight (biomass) of the plants and also the dry weight compared to the untreated infested control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP treatments increased sucrose and total soluble solids in sugar beet.

Treatment
tested NPse1
Outcome
sucrose and Total Soluble Solids (TSS)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“an increase in sucrose and Total Soluble Solids (TSS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2194–2247 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatments with the tested NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NP treatments increased total phenol content and polyphenol oxidase activity in sugar beet.

Treatment
tested NPse1
Gene
polyphenol oxidasee2
Outcome
total phenol content and activitye2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatments with the tested NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2003–2033 · show in text ↑
e2

“This was accompanied with an increase in sucrose and Total Soluble Solids (TSS) and also the total phenol content and activity of the defense related enzyme, polyphenol oxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2168–2344 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend MgO, TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles as an environmentally safe alternative to fungicides for damping-off and root rot of sugar beet.

Outcome
controlling damping-off and root rot diseasee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–79 · show in text ↑
e3

“could be a good and environmentally safe alternative of fungicides in controlling damping-off and root rot disease of sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2462–2590 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: phytochemicals · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.