Paper · 2017 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Effects of drought stress on physiological and biochemicalchanges in Phaseolus vulgaris L.

Sebnem Kusvuran; H. Yildiz Dasgan

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
49
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study investigated different levels (S1: 100% of field capacity- Control S2: 50% of field capacity-moderate stress; S3: 0% of field capacity-severe stress) of drought stress on oxidative damages and variations in antioxidants in the two bean varieties Bn-16 (drought-sensitive), Bn-150 (drought-tolerant) to elucidate the antioxidative protective mechanism governing differential drought tolerance. The shoot fresh weight, shoot height, leaf number and area, RWC were reduced with different level of drought stress. However this reduction clearly occurred in Bn-16 (sensitive). Antioxidative enzyme activities, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and glutation reductase, had a greater increase in tolerant genotypes (Bn-150) than in sensitive ones (Bn-16). The level of lipid peroxidation was measured by estimating malondialdehyde content. Lipid peroxidation increased with increasing drought conditions in all genotypes, although Bn-150 was the least affected when compared with the other genotype. Total phenolic and flavonoid content increased in bean genotypes under S2 and S3 conditions. The highest total phenolic and flavonoid contents were attained in Bn-150 subjected to S3 treatment. These results indicated that an antioxidant defence system, osmolytes (such as proline), and secondary metabolites play important roles in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) during drought stress and recovery.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced shoot fresh weight, shoot height, leaf number and area.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
shoot fresh weight, shoot height, leaf number and areae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot fresh weight, shoot height, leaf number and area, RWC were reduced with different level of drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced relative water content.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot fresh weight, shoot height, leaf number and area, RWC were reduced with different level of drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in growth and water status was clearer in sensitive Bn-16.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Material
Bn-16e0
Outcome
this reductione0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However this reduction clearly occurred in Bn-16 (sensitive).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme activities increased more in tolerant Bn-150 than in sensitive Bn-16.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Material
Bn-150e0
Gene
superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and glutation reductasee0
Outcome
Antioxidative enzyme activitiese0
Direction
greater increasee0
Comparator
Bn-16e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidative enzyme activities, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and glutation reductase, had a greater increase in tolerant genotypes (Bn-150) than in sensitive ones (Bn-16).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipid peroxidation increased with drought severity in both genotypes.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
drought conditionse0
Outcome
Lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lipid peroxidation increased with increasing drought conditions in all genotypes, although Bn-150 was the least affected when compared with the other genotype.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bn-150 was least affected by lipid peroxidation under drought.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Material
Bn-150e0
Outcome
Lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
least affectede0
Comparator
the other genotypee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lipid peroxidation increased with increasing drought conditions in all genotypes, although Bn-150 was the least affected when compared with the other genotype.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic content increased under S2 and S3.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
S2 and S3 conditionse0
Outcome
Total phenolice0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenolic and flavonoid content increased in bean genotypes under S2 and S3 conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavonoid content increased under S2 and S3.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
S2 and S3 conditionse0
Outcome
flavonoid contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenolic and flavonoid content increased in bean genotypes under S2 and S3 conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bn-150 under S3 had the highest total phenolic content.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Material
Bn-150e0
Treatment
S3 treatmente0
Outcome
total phenolice0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total phenolic and flavonoid contents were attained in Bn-150 subjected to S3 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bn-150 under S3 had the highest flavonoid content.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Material
Bn-150e0
Treatment
S3 treatmente0
Outcome
flavonoid contentse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total phenolic and flavonoid contents were attained in Bn-150 subjected to S3 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer an antioxidant defence system, osmolytes and secondary metabolites matter in drought stress and recovery.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Compound
prolinee0
Outcome
drought stress and recoverye0
Qualifier
antioxidant defence system, osmolytes (such as proline), and secondary metabolitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results indicated that an antioxidant defence system, osmolytes (such as proline), and secondary metabolites play important roles in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) during drought stress and recovery.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–90 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

24 papers: 8 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

drought · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

65 papers: 6 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.