Paper · 1987 · Plant Physiol., Suppl.; (United States)

CO/sub 2/ exchange characteristics of Pinus taeda L. shoots exposed to variable ozone levels and precipitation chemistries

Paul J. Hanson; S. B. McLaughlin

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Carbon dioxide exchange rates (CER) were measured as a function of photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFDs) on seedlings of two loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) families following 6- or 12-week exposures to variable levels of ozone (filtered or ambient air + 160 nl L/sup -1/) and acid precipitation (pH 3.5, 4.3, and 5.0). Exposures were made in open-top field chambers. CERs of whole shoots were measured in an open infrared gas analysis system at 6 levels of PPFD (0, 33, 60, 410, 800, and 1660 ..mu..mol m/sup -2/ s/sup -1/). Compared with control plants, ozone-treated seedlings exhibited statistically significant reduction in light-saturated CER of 36 and 28% for plants measured at 6- and 12-weeks, respectively. At 12 weeks, pH 3.5 and 4.3 precipitation treatments enhanced light-saturated CER by an average of 37% over that observed for seedlings exposed to the pH 5.0 treatment. No differences in dark respiration (CER at 0 PPFD) were detected between treatments. Enhancements of CER resulting from acid precipitation treatments were of the same magnitude as CER reductions due to ozone exposures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone reduced light-saturated shoot CER by 36% after six weeks versus controls.

Taxon
Pinus taeda L.Pinus taedat0
Treatment
ozone-treated seedlingse0
Outcome
light-saturated CERe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
36e0
Qualifier
6- and 12-weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ozone-treated seedlings exhibited statistically significant reduction in light-saturated CER of 36 and 28% for plants measured at 6- and 12-weeks, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus taeda L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone reduced light-saturated shoot CER by 28% after twelve weeks versus controls.

Taxon
Pinus taeda L.Pinus taedat0
Treatment
ozone-treated seedlingse0
Outcome
light-saturated CERe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
28%e0
Qualifier
6- and 12-weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ozone-treated seedlings exhibited statistically significant reduction in light-saturated CER of 36 and 28% for plants measured at 6- and 12-weeks, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus taeda L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 weeks pH 3.5 precipitation enhanced light-saturated CER by an average 37% relative to pH 5.0 precipitation.

Taxon
Pinus taeda L.Pinus taedat0
Treatment
pH 3.5e0
Outcome
light-saturated CERe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
37%e0
Qualifier
At 12 weekse0
Comparator
pH 5.0 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 12 weeks, pH 3.5 and 4.3 precipitation treatments enhanced light-saturated CER by an average of 37% over that observed for seedlings exposed to the pH 5.0 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus taeda L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 weeks pH 4.3 precipitation enhanced light-saturated CER by an average 37% relative to pH 5.0 precipitation.

Taxon
Pinus taeda L.Pinus taedat0
Treatment
4.3 precipitation treatmentse0
Outcome
light-saturated CERe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
37%e0
Qualifier
At 12 weekse0
Comparator
pH 5.0 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 12 weeks, pH 3.5 and 4.3 precipitation treatments enhanced light-saturated CER by an average of 37% over that observed for seedlings exposed to the pH 5.0 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus taeda L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark respiration did not differ between treatments.

Taxon
Pinus taeda L.Pinus taedat0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
dark respiratione0
Direction
No differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences in dark respiration (CER at 0 PPFD) were detected between treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus taeda L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–52 · show in text ↑

rainfall · molecular: metabolites · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

ph · molecular: metabolites · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

ozone · molecular: metabolites · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.