Paper · 2017 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Impact of rhizobial inoculation and reduced N supply on biomass production and biological N2 fixation in common bean grown hydroponically

Charis‐Konstantina Kontopoulou; Epifanios Liasis; Pietro PM Iannetta; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Testing rhizobial inoculation of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in hydroponics enables accurate quantification of biological N 2 fixation ( BNF ) and provides information about the potential of reducing inorganic N fertilizer use. In view of this background, common bean grown on pumice was inoculated with Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 ( Rt ) and supplied with either full‐N (total nitrogen 11.2 mmol L −1 ), 1/3 of full‐N or N‐free nutrient solution ( NS ). BNF was quantified at the early pod‐filling stage using the 15 N natural abundance method. RESULTS Full‐N supply to Rt ‐inoculated plants resulted in markedly smaller nodules than less‐ or zero‐N supply, and no BNF . Rt inoculation of full‐N‐treated plants did not increase biomass and pod yield compared with non‐inoculation. Restriction (1/3 of full‐N) or omission of inorganic N resulted in successful nodulation and BNF (54.3 and 49.2 kg N ha −1 , corresponding to 58 and 100% of total plant N content respectively) but suppressed dry shoot biomass from 191.7 (full‐N, + Rt ) to 107.4 and 43.2 g per plant respectively. Nutrient cation uptake was reduced when inorganic N supply was less or omitted. CONCLUSION Rt inoculation of hydroponic bean provides no advantage when full‐N NS is supplied, while 1/3 of full‐N or N‐free NS suppresses plant biomass and yield, partly because the restricted NO 3 − supply impairs cation uptake. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full N produced smaller nodules in inoculated common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Full‐N supplye0
Interactor
Rte0symbiont
Outcome
nodulese0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
less‐ or zero‐N supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Full‐N supply to Rt ‐inoculated plants resulted in markedly smaller nodules than less‐ or zero‐N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–684 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full N prevented biological nitrogen fixation in inoculated plants.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Full‐N supplye0
Interactor
Rte0symbiont
Outcome
BNFe0
Direction
no BNFe0
Comparator
less‐ or zero‐N supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Full‐N supply to Rt ‐inoculated plants resulted in markedly smaller nodules than less‐ or zero‐N supply, and no BNF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation under full N did not raise biomass or pod yield.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Rt inoculatione0
Interactor
Rte0symbiont
Outcome
biomass and pod yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
non‐inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rt inoculation of full‐N‐treated plants did not increase biomass and pod yield compared with non‐inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1/3 of full‐N enabled BNF of 54.3 kg N ha −1.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
1/3 of full‐Ne0
Outcome
BNFe0
Direction
successfule0
Value
54.3e0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Restriction (1/3 of full‐N) or omission of inorganic N resulted in successful nodulation and BNF (54.3 and 49.2 kg N ha −1 , corresponding to 58 and 100% of total plant N content respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

omission of inorganic N enabled BNF of 49.2 kg N ha −1.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
omission of inorganic Ne0
Outcome
BNFe0
Direction
successfule0
Value
49.2e0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Restriction (1/3 of full‐N) or omission of inorganic N resulted in successful nodulation and BNF (54.3 and 49.2 kg N ha −1 , corresponding to 58 and 100% of total plant N content respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1/3 of full‐N suppressed shoot biomass to 107.4.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Interactor
Rte0symbiont
Outcome
dry shoot biomasse0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
107.4e0
Comparator
full‐Ne0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suppressed dry shoot biomass from 191.7 (full‐N, + Rt ) to 107.4 and 43.2 g per plant respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

omission of inorganic N suppressed shoot biomass to 43.2 g per plant.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Interactor
Rte0symbiont
Outcome
dry shoot biomasse0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
43.2 g per plante0
Comparator
full‐Ne0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suppressed dry shoot biomass from 191.7 (full‐N, + Rt ) to 107.4 and 43.2 g per plant respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower or omitted inorganic N reduced nutrient cation uptake.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
inorganic N supply was less or omittede0
Outcome
Nutrient cation uptakee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient cation uptake was reduced when inorganic N supply was less or omitted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed biomass and yield suppression partly to impaired cation uptake under nitrate restriction.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
restricted NO 3 − supplye0
Outcome
plant biomass and yielde0
Qualifier
impairs cation uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1/3 of full‐N or N‐free NS suppresses plant biomass and yield, partly because the restricted NO 3 − supply impairs cation uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–116 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 153 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.