Paper · 2016 · Asian Journal of Plant Sciences

Impact of Putrescine and 24-epibrassinolide on Growth, Yield and Chemical Constituents of Cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) Plant Grown under Drought Stress Conditions

Ahmed H. Hanafy; Essam Darwish; Mohammad G. Alobaid

20
claims
52
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: Field experiment was carried during the two successive seasons (2014 and 2015) to study the effects of putrescine (Put) and 24-epibrassinolide (EBL) foliar applications on the growth, yield and chemical composition of Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90) plants grown under drought stress conditions. Materials and Methods: The soil of the experimental site was clay loam and plants were grown under three irrigation regimes, i.e., 100% as control, 75 and 50% from well watering. Three different doses of Put (0, 1 and 2 ppm) and EBL (0, 10G 9 and 10G 7 M) were sprayed on plants 5 times started at the day 40 after planting (DAP) and repeated every 15 days. Results: Drought caused a significantly and gradually decreases in the growth characters, yield and its components and chemical compositions e.g., N, P and K concentrations and CAT activity by increasing drought level, while increased lint percentage, Na percentage, total sugars, total soluble phenols, total free amino acid and proline concentrations, antioxidant enzymes POX, PPO and SOD activities. Moreover, the mean values for Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Net Assimilation Rate (NAR) tended to be lower under drought stress especially 50% drought level compared to control non-stressed plant but its increased at 75% drought level between 60 and 90 DAP. Applications of Put and EBL positively affected cotton growth and yield under drought stress conditions. These treatments resulted an increase in morphological characters e.g., plant height, number of leaves/plant, leaf area/plant and total plant dry weight. Also, Put and EBL increase chemical constituents related to drought tolerance either inorganic (N, P, K and Na) or organic constituents e.g., total free amino acids, total sugars, total soluble phenols, antioxidant enzymes CAT, POX and SOD activities, while proline concentration, PPO activity as well as lint percentage were decreased. As a result of promoting growth induced by previous foliar applications, yield components e.g., number of open bolls, fiber length, fiber strength and micronaire value increased. Conclusion: Generally, Put at 2 ppm and EBL at 10G 7 M applications recorded the highest values of growth and yield characters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased cotton growth characters.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Droughte2
Outcome
growth characterse2
Direction
decreasese2
Comparator
100% as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% as control, 75 and 50% from well watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–509 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought caused a significantly and gradually decreases in the growth characters, yield and its components and chemical compositions e.g., N, P and K concentrations and CAT activity by increasing drought level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased cotton yield and its components.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Droughte2
Outcome
yield and its componentse2
Direction
decreasese2
Comparator
100% as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% as control, 75 and 50% from well watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–509 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought caused a significantly and gradually decreases in the growth characters, yield and its components and chemical compositions e.g., N, P and K concentrations and CAT activity by increasing drought level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased N, P and K concentrations in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Droughte2
Outcome
N, P and K concentrationse2
Direction
decreasese2
Comparator
100% as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% as control, 75 and 50% from well watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–509 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought caused a significantly and gradually decreases in the growth characters, yield and its components and chemical compositions e.g., N, P and K concentrations and CAT activity by increasing drought level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased CAT activity in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Droughte2
Outcome
CAT activitye2
Direction
decreasese2
Comparator
100% as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% as control, 75 and 50% from well watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–509 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought caused a significantly and gradually decreases in the growth characters, yield and its components and chemical compositions e.g., N, P and K concentrations and CAT activity by increasing drought level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased lint percentage, Na percentage and total sugars in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Droughte2
Outcome
lint percentage, Na percentage, total sugarse3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
100% as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% as control, 75 and 50% from well watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–509 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought caused a significantly and gradually decreases in the growth characters, yield and its components and chemical compositions e.g., N, P and K concentrations and CAT activity by increasing drought level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–907 · show in text ↑
e3

“while increased lint percentage, Na percentage, total sugars, total soluble phenols, total free amino acid and proline concentrations, antioxidant enzymes POX, PPO and SOD activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased total soluble phenols, total free amino acids and proline concentrations in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Droughte2
Outcome
total soluble phenols, total free amino acid and proline concentrationse3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
100% as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% as control, 75 and 50% from well watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–509 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought caused a significantly and gradually decreases in the growth characters, yield and its components and chemical compositions e.g., N, P and K concentrations and CAT activity by increasing drought level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–907 · show in text ↑
e3

“while increased lint percentage, Na percentage, total sugars, total soluble phenols, total free amino acid and proline concentrations, antioxidant enzymes POX, PPO and SOD activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased antioxidant enzyme POX, PPO and SOD activities in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Droughte2
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes POX, PPO and SOD activitiese3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
100% as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e1

“100% as control, 75 and 50% from well watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–509 · show in text ↑
e2

“Drought caused a significantly and gradually decreases in the growth characters, yield and its components and chemical compositions e.g., N, P and K concentrations and CAT activity by increasing drought level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–907 · show in text ↑
e3

“while increased lint percentage, Na percentage, total sugars, total soluble phenols, total free amino acid and proline concentrations, antioxidant enzymes POX, PPO and SOD activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, relative growth rate and net assimilation rate tended to be lower than in non-stressed control plants, especially at 50% drought.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
drought stresse4
Outcome
Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Net Assimilation Rate (NAR)e4
Direction
lowere4
Qualifier
especially 50% drought levele4
Comparator
control non-stressed plante4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e4

“the mean values for Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Net Assimilation Rate (NAR) tended to be lower under drought stress especially 50% drought level compared to control non-stressed plant but its increased at 75% drought level between 60 and 90 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 75% drought, relative growth rate and net assimilation rate increased between 60 and 90 days after planting.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
75% drought levele4
Outcome
Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Net Assimilation Rate (NAR)e4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
between 60 and 90 DAPe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e4

“the mean values for Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Net Assimilation Rate (NAR) tended to be lower under drought stress especially 50% drought level compared to control non-stressed plant but its increased at 75% drought level between 60 and 90 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar putrescine and 24-epibrassinolide positively affected cotton growth and yield under drought.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Applications of Put and EBLe5
Outcome
growth and yielde5
Direction
positively affectede5
Qualifier
under drought stress conditionse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e5

“Applications of Put and EBL positively affected cotton growth and yield under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Put and EBL increased plant height, number of leaves per plant and leaf area per plant under drought.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Put and EBLe5
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves/plant, leaf area/plante6
Direction
increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e5

“Applications of Put and EBL positively affected cotton growth and yield under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1455 · show in text ↑
e6

“These treatments resulted an increase in morphological characters e.g., plant height, number of leaves/plant, leaf area/plant and total plant dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Put and EBL increased total plant dry weight under drought.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Put and EBLe5
Outcome
total plant dry weighte6
Direction
increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e5

“Applications of Put and EBL positively affected cotton growth and yield under drought stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1455 · show in text ↑
e6

“These treatments resulted an increase in morphological characters e.g., plant height, number of leaves/plant, leaf area/plant and total plant dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Put and EBL increased inorganic N, P and K constituents of cotton under drought.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Put and EBLe7
Outcome
N, P, Ke7
Direction
increasee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e7

“Put and EBL increase chemical constituents related to drought tolerance either inorganic (N, P, K and Na) or organic constituents e.g., total free amino acids, total sugars, total soluble phenols, antioxidant enzymes CAT, POX and SOD activities, while proline concentration, PPO activity as well as lint percentage were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Put and EBL increased inorganic Na constituents of cotton under drought.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Put and EBLe7
Outcome
Nae7
Direction
increasee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e7

“Put and EBL increase chemical constituents related to drought tolerance either inorganic (N, P, K and Na) or organic constituents e.g., total free amino acids, total sugars, total soluble phenols, antioxidant enzymes CAT, POX and SOD activities, while proline concentration, PPO activity as well as lint percentage were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Put and EBL increased organic constituents of cotton under drought.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Put and EBLe7
Outcome
total free amino acids, total sugars, total soluble phenolse7
Direction
increasee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e7

“Put and EBL increase chemical constituents related to drought tolerance either inorganic (N, P, K and Na) or organic constituents e.g., total free amino acids, total sugars, total soluble phenols, antioxidant enzymes CAT, POX and SOD activities, while proline concentration, PPO activity as well as lint percentage were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Put and EBL increased CAT, POX and SOD antioxidant enzyme activities in cotton under drought.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Put and EBLe7
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes CAT, POX and SOD activitiese7
Direction
increasee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e7

“Put and EBL increase chemical constituents related to drought tolerance either inorganic (N, P, K and Na) or organic constituents e.g., total free amino acids, total sugars, total soluble phenols, antioxidant enzymes CAT, POX and SOD activities, while proline concentration, PPO activity as well as lint percentage were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Put and EBL decreased proline concentration, PPO activity and lint percentage in cotton under drought.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Put and EBLe7
Outcome
proline concentration, PPO activity as well as lint percentagee7
Direction
decreasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e7

“Put and EBL increase chemical constituents related to drought tolerance either inorganic (N, P, K and Na) or organic constituents e.g., total free amino acids, total sugars, total soluble phenols, antioxidant enzymes CAT, POX and SOD activities, while proline concentration, PPO activity as well as lint percentage were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous foliar applications increased number of open bolls, fiber length and fiber strength in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
previous foliar applicationse6
Outcome
number of open bolls, fiber length, fiber strengthe6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e6

“As a result of promoting growth induced by previous foliar applications, yield components e.g., number of open bolls, fiber length, fiber strength and micronaire value increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1948–2125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous foliar applications increased micronaire value in cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
previous foliar applicationse6
Outcome
micronaire valuee6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e6

“As a result of promoting growth induced by previous foliar applications, yield components e.g., number of open bolls, fiber length, fiber strength and micronaire value increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1948–2125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Put at 2 ppm combined with EBL at 10G 7 M recorded the highest values of cotton growth and yield characters.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadense L.Gossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 90e0
Treatment
Put at 2 ppm and EBL at 10G 7 M applicationse7
Outcome
growth and yield characterse7
Direction
highest valuese7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense L., cv., Giza 90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–285 · show in text ↑
e7

“Put at 2 ppm and EBL at 10G 7 M applications recorded the highest values of growth and yield characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2150–2253 · show in text ↑

application · quality: grain · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.