Paper · 2014 · Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)

A HYDROPONIC APPROACH TO EVALUATE RESPONSES TO NUTRIENTS AND PHYTOHORMONES IN COTTON PLANTS (Gossypium hirsutum L.) GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

Adebusoye O. Onanuga

20
claims
32
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cotton plant growth and development, as well as monitoring nutrient use efficiency were evaluated using hydroponic approach. Two set of experiments were conducted to determine the influence of phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and PK and exogenous application of Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA3), zeatin (Z) and their combinations on growth and development of cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum) grown hydroponically. In the nutrient solution experiment, cotton vegetative growth was positively influenced by low P (half strength Hoagland standard solution), low K (one-sixth strength Hoagland standard solution) and high PK treatments (Hoagland standard solution). Phytohormone experiment negatively supported vegetative growth except root length at 43 days after transplanting (DAT). The nutrients levels applied significantly favoured NPK uptake by cotton plants while exogenous phytohormones application did not affect NPK uptake by cotton plants, except N uptake by stem. Low P and low K treatments estimated to have high nutrient use efficiency (NUE). For chlorophyll formation, low K and high PK significantly increased formation of chlorophyll a, b and total ab while the application of GA3, IAA, Z and IAA x GA3 x 2Z treatments significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and total ab at 80 DAT only. Low K and low P treatments stimulated endogenous phytohormone contents in the cotton plants. In the phytohormone experiment, cotton plants treated to IAA x GA3 x Z increased endogenous phytohormone contents in the cotton plants. Low P, low K, high PK treatments and phytohormones treatments significantly increased root area, root volume and root activity. Low P, low K and high PK treatments applied significantly influenced residual level of P and K in the hydroponics while phytohormone treatments did not affect residual level of P and K except at 43 DAT. Evapotranspiration rate was high at early and reproductive stages of plant growth. This report shows the response of mineral nutrients and phytohormones to support growth and development of cotton plants grown hydroponically.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low phosphorus improved cotton vegetative growth.

Treatment
low P (half strength Hoagland standard solution)e0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton vegetative growth was positively influenced by low P (half strength Hoagland standard solution)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low potassium improved cotton vegetative growth.

Treatment
low K (one-sixth strength Hoagland standard solution)e0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton vegetative growth was positively influenced by low P (half strength Hoagland standard solution), low K (one-sixth strength Hoagland standard solution)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High PK improved cotton vegetative growth.

Treatment
high PK treatments (Hoagland standard solution)e0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton vegetative growth was positively influenced by low P (half strength Hoagland standard solution), low K (one-sixth strength Hoagland standard solution) and high PK treatments (Hoagland standard solution)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–677 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytohormone treatment negatively affected vegetative growth.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
Phytohormone experimente0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
negatively supportede0
Qualifier
except root length at 43 days after transplanting (DAT)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytohormone experiment negatively supported vegetative growth except root length at 43 days after transplanting (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–797 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytohormone treatment increased root length at 43 DAT relative to its negative effects on other vegetative growth.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
Phytohormone experimente0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Qualifier
43 days after transplanting (DAT)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytohormone experiment negatively supported vegetative growth except root length at 43 days after transplanting (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–797 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nutrient levels significantly favored cotton NPK uptake.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
nutrients levels appliede0
Outcome
NPK uptakee0
Direction
favourede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutrients levels applied significantly favoured NPK uptake by cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous phytohormones did not affect cotton NPK uptake except stem N uptake.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
exogenous phytohormones applicatione0
Outcome
NPK uptakee0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
except N uptake by steme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exogenous phytohormones application did not affect NPK uptake by cotton plants, except N uptake by stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P gave high cotton nutrient use efficiency.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
Low Pe0
Outcome
nutrient use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low P and low K treatments estimated to have high nutrient use efficiency (NUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low K gave high cotton nutrient use efficiency.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
low Ke0
Outcome
nutrient use efficiency (NUE)e0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low P and low K treatments estimated to have high nutrient use efficiency (NUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low K significantly increased cotton chlorophyll a, b and total ab.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
low Ke0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and total abe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low K and high PK significantly increased formation of chlorophyll a, b and total ab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1182 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High PK significantly increased cotton chlorophyll a, b and total ab.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
high PKe0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and total abe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low K and high PK significantly increased formation of chlorophyll a, b and total ab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1182 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and total ab at 80 DAT.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and total abe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
80 DAT onlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of GA3, IAA, Z and IAA x GA3 x 2Z treatments significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and total ab at 80 DAT only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and total ab at 80 DAT.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and total abe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
80 DAT onlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of GA3, IAA, Z and IAA x GA3 x 2Z treatments significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and total ab at 80 DAT only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Z significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and total ab at 80 DAT.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
Ze0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and total abe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
80 DAT onlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of GA3, IAA, Z and IAA x GA3 x 2Z treatments significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and total ab at 80 DAT only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA x GA3 x 2Z significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and total ab at 80 DAT.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
IAA x GA3 x 2Ze0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and total abe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
80 DAT onlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of GA3, IAA, Z and IAA x GA3 x 2Z treatments significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and total ab at 80 DAT only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low K and low P stimulated endogenous cotton phytohormone contents.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
Low K and low P treatmentse0
Outcome
endogenous phytohormone contentse0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low K and low P treatments stimulated endogenous phytohormone contents in the cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA x GA3 x Z increased endogenous cotton phytohormone contents.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
IAA x GA3 x Ze0
Outcome
endogenous phytohormone contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton plants treated to IAA x GA3 x Z increased endogenous phytohormone contents in the cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P, low K, high PK and phytohormones significantly increased cotton root area, volume and activity.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
Low P, low K, high PK treatments and phytohormones treatmentse0
Outcome
root area, root volume and root activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low P, low K, high PK treatments and phytohormones treatments significantly increased root area, root volume and root activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1675 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P, low K and high PK significantly influenced residual hydroponic P and K levels.

Treatment
Low P, low K and high PK treatmentse0
Outcome
residual level of P and K in the hydroponicse0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Low P, low K and high PK treatments applied significantly influenced residual level of P and K in the hydroponics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1790 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Evapotranspiration was high at early and reproductive cotton growth stages.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Organ / stage
early and reproductive stagese0
Outcome
Evapotranspiration ratee0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evapotranspiration rate was high at early and reproductive stages of plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–1961 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–408 · show in text ↑

indole-3-acetic acid · physiology: hormones · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Gibberellic acid · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Gibberellic acid · physiology: hormones · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

indole-3-acetic acid · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

class · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

class · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.