Paper · 2016

Effect of different fertilizers on growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under salt stress

Sobia Kiran; Noshin Ilyas; Nazima Batool; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Salt stress harshly effects crop production in arid and semi-arid regions. It spoils seed germination, diminishes nodule formation, delays plant development and reduces crop yield. A pot experiment was conducted at PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, to evaluate the effect of salt stress on germination of chickpea which was grown with different fertilizers. Sodium chloride was used as a source of salinity; concentration is 100mM. The combination of compost and NPK has caused an increase of 30% in root length of CM-88 and 24% in Hybrid. A reduction in dry weight and lengths of radical and plumule was observed with increase in salt concentration. Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium (NPK) and Compost application increases 10% leaf number in CM-88. The combination of compost and NPK has increased chlorophyll by 40% inCM-88 and 25% in Hybrid variety as compared to salt stress. Cell membrane stability of plants also experienced a drastic reduction. Combined applications of NPK with compost help to combat salt stress and increase productivity in salt affected croplands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost plus NPK increased CM-88 root length by 30%.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
CM-88e0
Treatment
combination of compost and NPKe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combination of compost and NPK has caused an increase of 30% in root length of CM-88”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost plus NPK increased Hybrid root length by 24%.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Hybride0
Treatment
combination of compost and NPKe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combination of compost and NPK has caused an increase of 30% in root length of CM-88 and 24% in Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salt concentration reduced dry weight, radicle length, and plumule length.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
increase in salt concentratione0
Outcome
dry weight and lengths of radical and plumulee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“A reduction in dry weight and lengths of radical and plumule was observed with increase in salt concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK and compost increased CM-88 leaf number by 10%.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
CM-88e0
Treatment
Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium (NPK) and Compost applicatione0
Outcome
leaf numbere0
Direction
increasese0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium (NPK) and Compost application increases 10% leaf number in CM-88”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost plus NPK increased CM-88 chlorophyll by 40% versus salt stress.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
CM-88e0
Treatment
combination of compost and NPKe0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
salt stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combination of compost and NPK has increased chlorophyll by 40% inCM-88 and 25% in Hybrid variety as compared to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost plus NPK increased Hybrid chlorophyll by 25% versus salt stress.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Hybrid varietye0
Treatment
combination of compost and NPKe0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
salt stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combination of compost and NPK has increased chlorophyll by 40% inCM-88 and 25% in Hybrid variety as compared to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell membrane stability was drastically reduced.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Cell membrane stabilitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cell membrane stability of plants also experienced a drastic reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–958 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

58 papers: 55 positive, 3 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

salinity · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

66 papers: 6 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

potassium · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.