Paper · 2016 · Journal of Integrative Agriculture

Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage quality: assessment of degradation (in situ) and gas production (in vitro)

Ce LIU; Yu-jiao LAI; Xiao-nan LU; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is difficult to ensile successfully because of the low content of moisture and water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC) in fresh alfalfa and the high buffering capacity in fresh alfalfa. Here, we conducted a study to evaluate the effects of three lactic acid bacteria (LAB) inoculants (Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Pediococcus pentosaceus) on silage quality, in situ ruminal degradability, and in vitro fermentation of alfalfa silage. The first cut of alfalfa was wilted, chopped, and randomly divided into four groups: the control (CON) and control mixed with three separate LAB inoculants (106 cfu g−1). Simmental steers with a body weight of (452±18) kg and with installed rumen fistulas were prepared for in situ degradation and for in vitro gas production. LAB inoculants had a lower (P<0.05) content of butyric acid than the CON group. Among them, the L. casei inoculated silage had a higher (P<0.05) content of water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and a lower (P<0.05) NH3-H content. The effective degradation (ED) of crude protein in LAB inoculation decreased (P<0.05), while the ED of acid detergent fiber increased (P<0.05) in situ fermentation. The alfalfa silage with LAB inoculants produced more carbon dioxide (P<0.05). The NH3-H content of mixed incubation fluid in L. casei inoculated silage was lower (P<0.05) compared with other groups. Therefore, this study showed that LAB inoculants could improve both ensiling quality and degradation. In particular, the L. casei inoculations exhibited better performance by limiting proteolysis during ensiling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LAB inoculants had a lower butyric acid content than the control silage.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
LAB inoculantse1
Interactor
LABe1other
Outcome
content of butyric acide1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
CON groupe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is difficult to ensile successfully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“LAB inoculants had a lower (P<0.05) content of butyric acid than the CON group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The L. casei inoculated silage had a higher water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
L. casei inoculated silagee2
Interactor
L. caseiLacticaseibacillus caseie2other
Outcome
water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC)e2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lacticaseibacillus casei
Lacticaseibacillus casei · InteractorA doubt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is difficult to ensile successfully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among them, the L. casei inoculated silage had a higher (P<0.05) content of water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and a lower (P<0.05) NH3-H content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The L. casei inoculated silage had a lower NH3-H content.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
L. casei inoculated silagee2
Interactor
L. caseiLacticaseibacillus caseie2other
Outcome
NH3-H contente2
Direction
lowere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lacticaseibacillus casei
Lacticaseibacillus casei · InteractorA doubt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is difficult to ensile successfully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among them, the L. casei inoculated silage had a higher (P<0.05) content of water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and a lower (P<0.05) NH3-H content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LAB inoculation decreased the effective degradation of crude protein in situ.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
LAB inoculatione3
Interactor
LABe3other
Outcome
effective degradation (ED) of crude proteine3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is difficult to ensile successfully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e3

“The effective degradation (ED) of crude protein in LAB inoculation decreased (P<0.05), while the ED of acid detergent fiber increased (P<0.05) in situ fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LAB inoculation increased the effective degradation of acid detergent fiber in situ.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
LAB inoculatione3
Interactor
LABe3other
Outcome
ED of acid detergent fibere3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is difficult to ensile successfully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e3

“The effective degradation (ED) of crude protein in LAB inoculation decreased (P<0.05), while the ED of acid detergent fiber increased (P<0.05) in situ fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The alfalfa silage with LAB inoculants produced more carbon dioxide.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae4
Treatment
LAB inoculantse4
Interactor
LABe4other
Outcome
carbon dioxidee4
Direction
moree4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The alfalfa silage with LAB inoculants produced more carbon dioxide (P<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The NH3-H content of mixed incubation fluid was lower in L. casei inoculated silage than in other groups.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
L. casei inoculated silagee5
Interactor
L. caseiLacticaseibacillus caseie5other
Outcome
NH3-H content of mixed incubation fluide5
Direction
lowere5
Comparator
other groupse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lacticaseibacillus casei
Lacticaseibacillus casei · InteractorA doubt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is difficult to ensile successfully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e5

“The NH3-H content of mixed incubation fluid in L. casei inoculated silage was lower (P<0.05) compared with other groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1389 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

L. casei inoculations performed better by limiting proteolysis during ensiling.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
L. casei inoculationse6
Interactor
L. caseiLacticaseibacillus caseie6other
Outcome
performancee6
Qualifier
by limiting proteolysis during ensilinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lacticaseibacillus casei
Lacticaseibacillus casei · InteractorA doubt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is difficult to ensile successfully”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e6

“the L. casei inoculations exhibited better performance by limiting proteolysis during ensiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1602 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: sugar starch · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 67 positive, 8 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.