Abstract
The present study was conducted during 2007 to 2010 in 15 year old guava orchards at Chandauli (U.P.) India. The selected trees were headed back (Rejuvenated) from 1.5 - 2.0m height from ground level applied IPNM, VAM fungi alone and in combination just after rejuvenation and to compare the response from unrejuvenated tree practiced by farmers of guava var. Allahabadi safeda L. There was 56.44% gap in technology adoption and farmers practice resulted in low yield with poor fruit quality. The rejuvenated guava tree applied IPNM and VAM was found to be most effective enhancing emergence of new shoots (3.76 fold) fruit weight (1.89 fold) and TSS (1.11fold). The fruit yield recorded 140.55% higher in trees with IPNM and VAM followed by IPNM and VAM over the yield of control. The nutrients content in different treatment were also found significantly higher compared to control. The VAM fungi significantly increased the uptake of N, P, Mg, Zn, Cu and Fe over control. The root infection was examined 66.5% and 72.55% in trees inoculated with IPNM+VAM and VAM respectively and 13.5% in control without inoculation. BCR of FP was followed decreasing trend while BCR of rejuvenated trees with IPNM and VAM was in increasing trend. The cost of rejuvenation of guava tree observed higher and yield was lower in initial year results lower BCR but just in 3 years of rejuvenation the BCR increased 2.37 fold, 2.12 fold and 2 fold with IPNM+VAM, IPNM and VAM respectively than control plot.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Farm practice had a 56.44% technology adoption gap and low yield and fruit quality.
- Taxon
- Psidium guajava
Psidium guajavat0 - Outcome
- gap in technology adoptione0
- Value
- 56.44%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was 56.44% gap in technology adoption and farmers practice resulted in low yield with poor fruit quality.”
t0“Psidium guajava”
Claim · model-written summary
Rejuvenation with IPNM and VAM enhanced new shoot emergence 3.76 fold.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavae0
- Treatment
- IPNM and VAMe0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- emergence of new shootse0
- Direction
- enhancinge0
- Value
- 3.76 folde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The rejuvenated guava tree applied IPNM and VAM was found to be most effective enhancing emergence of new shoots (3.76 fold) fruit weight (1.89 fold) and TSS (1.11fold).”
Claim · model-written summary
Rejuvenation with IPNM and VAM enhanced fruit weight 1.89 fold.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavae0
- Treatment
- IPNM and VAMe0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- fruit weighte0
- Direction
- enhancinge0
- Value
- 1.89 folde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The rejuvenated guava tree applied IPNM and VAM was found to be most effective enhancing emergence of new shoots (3.76 fold) fruit weight (1.89 fold) and TSS (1.11fold).”
Claim · model-written summary
Rejuvenation with IPNM and VAM enhanced TSS 1.11fold.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavae0
- Treatment
- IPNM and VAMe0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- TSSe0
- Direction
- enhancinge0
- Value
- 1.11folde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The rejuvenated guava tree applied IPNM and VAM was found to be most effective enhancing emergence of new shoots (3.76 fold) fruit weight (1.89 fold) and TSS (1.11fold).”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit yield with IPNM and VAM was 140.55% higher than control.
- Taxon
- Psidium guajavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- IPNM and VAMe0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 140.55%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fruit yield recorded 140.55% higher in trees with IPNM and VAM followed by IPNM and VAM over the yield of control.”
t0“Psidium guajava”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment increased nutrient content relative to control.
- Taxon
- Psidium guajavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- different treatmente0
- Outcome
- nutrients contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nutrients content in different treatment were also found significantly higher compared to control.”
t0“Psidium guajava”
Claim · model-written summary
VAM increased uptake of N, P, Mg, Zn, Cu and Fe over control.
- Taxon
- Psidium guajavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- VAM fungie0
- Interactor
- VAM fungie0symbiont
- Outcome
- uptake of N, P, Mg, Zn, Cu and Fee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The VAM fungi significantly increased the uptake of N, P, Mg, Zn, Cu and Fe over control.”
t0“Psidium guajava”
Claim · model-written summary
Root infection was 66.5% with IPNM+VAM versus 13.5% without inoculation.
- Taxon
- Psidium guajavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- IPNM+VAMe0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- root infectione0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 66.5%e0
- Qualifier
- 13.5%e0
- Comparator
- control without inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The root infection was examined 66.5% and 72.55% in trees inoculated with IPNM+VAM and VAM respectively and 13.5% in control without inoculation.”
t0“Psidium guajava”
Claim · model-written summary
Root infection was 72.55% with VAM versus 13.5% without inoculation.
- Taxon
- Psidium guajavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- VAMe0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- root infectione0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 72.55%e0
- Qualifier
- 13.5%e0
- Comparator
- control without inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The root infection was examined 66.5% and 72.55% in trees inoculated with IPNM+VAM and VAM respectively and 13.5% in control without inoculation.”
t0“Psidium guajava”
Claim · model-written summary
BCR of farmer practice decreased, whereas BCR of rejuvenated trees with IPNM and VAM increased.
- Taxon
- Psidium guajavaPsidium guajavat0
- Outcome
- BCR of FPe0
- Direction
- decreasing trende0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“BCR of FP was followed decreasing trend while BCR of rejuvenated trees with IPNM and VAM was in increasing trend.”
t0“Psidium guajava”
Claim · model-written summary
Rejuvenation with IPNM+VAM raised BCR 2.37 fold after three years versus control.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavae0
- Treatment
- IPNM+VAMe0
- Outcome
- BCRe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.37 folde0
- Qualifier
- 3 years of rejuvenatione0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The cost of rejuvenation of guava tree observed higher and yield was lower in initial year results lower BCR but just in 3 years of rejuvenation the BCR increased 2.37 fold, 2.12 fold and 2 fold with IPNM+VAM, IPNM and VAM respectively than control plot.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rejuvenation with IPNM raised BCR 2.12 fold after three years versus control.
- Taxon
- Psidium guajavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- IPNMe0
- Outcome
- BCRe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.12 folde0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the BCR increased 2.37 fold, 2.12 fold and 2 fold with IPNM+VAM, IPNM and VAM respectively than control plot.”
t0“Psidium guajava”
Claim · model-written summary
Rejuvenation with VAM raised BCR 2 fold after three years versus control.
- Taxon
- Psidium guajavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- VAMe0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- BCRe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2 folde0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the BCR increased 2.37 fold, 2.12 fold and 2 fold with IPNM+VAM, IPNM and VAM respectively than control plot.”
t0“Psidium guajava”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
mycorrhiza · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →mycorrhiza · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.