Paper · 1990 · HortScience

EFFECTS OF N FERTILITY, PLANT DENSITY AND CULTIVAR ON YIELD OF DILL

Owusu Bandele; Xenia Wolff; Byron Belvitt; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted in 1988 and 1990 to determine the effects of planting density, N fertilizer rate, and cultivar on fresh yield of dill. A split plot design was used in the first experiment in which planting density (one versus two rows per bed) was the main plot treatment and N rate (0, 56, 112 kg/ha) was the subplot treatment. A European cultivar, `Crown,' was used in the first experiment in 1988 while `Long Island Mammoth' was planted in 1990, N was applied in split applications while both K 2 O and P 2 O 5 were preplant incorporated at the rate of 134 kg/ha. Planting was done on bedded rows approximately 66 cm wide and 15 cm high. N fertilizer application did not affect yield in 1988. Leaf, stem, flower, and total yields were greater for the high density planting. The second experiment evaluated yield of four cultivars (`Tetra,' `Bouquet.' `Long Island Mammoth,' and `Crown') using a randomized complete block design. `Long Island Mammoth' and `Tetra' produced greater leaf and total fresh weight while `Long Island Mammoth' and `Bouquet' produced greater flower fresh weight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer application did not affect dill yield in 1988.

Treatment
N fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
1988e0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer application did not affect yield in 1988.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“DILL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting increased dill leaf, stem and flower yields.

Treatment
high density plantinge0
Outcome
Leaf, stem, flower, and total yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
one versus two rows per bede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf, stem, flower, and total yields were greater for the high density planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting density (one versus two rows per bed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–258 · show in text ↑
t0

“DILL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting increased total dill yield.

Treatment
high density plantinge0
Outcome
total yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
one versus two rows per bede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf, stem, flower, and total yields were greater for the high density planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting density (one versus two rows per bed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–258 · show in text ↑
t0

“DILL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long Island Mammoth had greater leaf and total fresh weight.

Material
Long Island Mammothe0
Outcome
leaf and total fresh weighte0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Long Island Mammoth' and `Tetra' produced greater leaf and total fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“DILL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetra had greater leaf and total fresh weight.

Material
Tetrae0
Outcome
leaf and total fresh weighte0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Long Island Mammoth' and `Tetra' produced greater leaf and total fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“DILL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long Island Mammoth had greater flower fresh weight.

Material
Long Island Mammothe0
Outcome
flower fresh weighte0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Long Island Mammoth' and `Bouquet' produced greater flower fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“DILL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bouquet had greater flower fresh weight.

Material
Bouquete0
Outcome
flower fresh weighte0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Long Island Mammoth' and `Bouquet' produced greater flower fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“DILL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.