Paper · 2008

Effect of Common Cultural Practices on Septoria Leaf Blotch Disease and Grain Yield of Irrigated Durum Wheat

S. Rezgui; M. Fakhfakh; Samah Boukef; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rezgui, S., Fakhfakh, M. M., Boukef, S., Rhaiem, A., Cherif, Mo., Cherif, Ma., and Yahyaoui, A. H. 2008. Effect of common cultural practices on Septoria leaf blotch disease and grain yield of irrigated durum wheat. Tunisian Journal of Plant Protection 3: 59-67. Using alternative cultural practices could be an attractive option to reduce fungicide without impairing Septoria leaf blotch disease (caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola, anamorph: Septoria tritici) control in irrigated durum wheat fields. Association between common cultural practices and disease related traits were assessed from data collected on a sample of 48 durum wheat fields. Results suggested that relying exclusively on one component rather than integrating a combination of practices is not cost effective to alleviate Septoria leaf blotch disease impact on grain yield. Disease severity increase was attributed to the extensive use of a susceptible cultivar “Karim”, early sowing, higher seeding rate, on farm produced seeds, greater nitrogen rates, and an ineffective fungicide application explaining 81.7% of the total variability of the surveyed durum wheat fields. Fungicide application reduced Septoria leaf blotch disease infection and its spread in treated fields but did not prevent infection. Fungicide application effect was lower for both low (less than 10%) and high (greater than 60%) severity, but it was effective when severity ranged from 40% and 50%. Lower critical Septoria leaf blotch disease threshold ranging between 10 to 20 % appeared to be adequate in reducing Septoria leaf blotch disease impact on grain yield. The study shows that lack of disease damage assessment is the most important component of farmers’ decision-making process with regard to the treatment dates and number of fungicide applications. Implementing a suitable integrated Septoria leaf blotch disease management program in irrigated durum wheat areas should be sought by varying cultural practices options.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relying on a single cultural practice rather than a combination is not cost effective for reducing Septoria leaf blotch impact on durum wheat grain yield.

Treatment
relying exclusively on one componente1
Interactor
Mycosphaerella graminicolaZymoseptoria triticie0pathogen
Outcome
cost effective to alleviate Septoria leaf blotch disease impact on grain yielde1
Direction
not cost effectivee1
Comparator
integrating a combination of practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola, anamorph: Septoria tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–461 · show in text ↑
e1

“relying exclusively on one component rather than integrating a combination of practices is not cost effective to alleviate Septoria leaf blotch disease impact on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–845 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extensive use of the susceptible cultivar Karim, early sowing and higher seeding rate were attributed to increased Septoria leaf blotch severity in durum wheat fields.

Treatment
extensive use of a susceptible cultivar “Karim”, early sowing, higher seeding ratee0
Outcome
Disease severitye0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Disease severity increase was attributed to the extensive use of a susceptible cultivar “Karim”, early sowing, higher seeding rate, on farm produced seeds, greater nitrogen rates, and an ineffective fungicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1067 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On-farm produced seed, greater nitrogen rates and an ineffective fungicide application were attributed to increased Septoria leaf blotch severity in durum wheat fields.

Treatment
on farm produced seeds, greater nitrogen rates, and an ineffective fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
Disease severitye0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Disease severity increase was attributed to the extensive use of a susceptible cultivar “Karim”, early sowing, higher seeding rate, on farm produced seeds, greater nitrogen rates, and an ineffective fungicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1067 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The surveyed factors explained 81.7% of the total variability of durum wheat fields.

Outcome
total variabilitye0
Value
81.7%e0
Setting
surveyed durum wheat fieldse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“explaining 81.7% of the total variability of the surveyed durum wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application reduced Septoria leaf blotch infection and its spread in treated durum wheat fields.

Treatment
Fungicide applicatione0
Interactor
Mycosphaerella graminicolaZymoseptoria triticie1pathogen
Outcome
Septoria leaf blotch disease infection and its spreade0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fungicide application reduced Septoria leaf blotch disease infection and its spread in treated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola, anamorph: Septoria tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application did not prevent Septoria leaf blotch infection in durum wheat.

Treatment
Fungicide applicatione0
Interactor
Mycosphaerella graminicolaZymoseptoria triticie1pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
did not prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fungicide application reduced Septoria leaf blotch disease infection and its spread in treated fields but did not prevent infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1277 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola, anamorph: Septoria tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide effect on Septoria leaf blotch was lower at low (less than 10%) and high (greater than 60%) severity than at 40% to 50% severity.

Treatment
Fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
Fungicide application effecte0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
low (less than 10%) and high (greater than 60%) severitye0
Comparator
when severity ranged from 40% and 50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fungicide application effect was lower for both low (less than 10%) and high (greater than 60%) severity, but it was effective when severity ranged from 40% and 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application was effective against Septoria leaf blotch when severity ranged from 40% to 50%.

Treatment
Fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
effectivee0
Qualifier
when severity ranged from 40% and 50%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fungicide application effect was lower for both low (less than 10%) and high (greater than 60%) severity, but it was effective when severity ranged from 40% and 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1443 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A lower critical Septoria leaf blotch threshold of 10 to 20% appears adequate for reducing disease impact on durum wheat grain yield.

Outcome
Lower critical Septoria leaf blotch disease thresholde0
Value
between 10 to 20 %e0
Qualifier
adequate in reducing Septoria leaf blotch disease impact on grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lower critical Septoria leaf blotch disease threshold ranging between 10 to 20 % appeared to be adequate in reducing Septoria leaf blotch disease impact on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1612 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lack of disease damage assessment is the most important component of farmers’ decision-making on fungicide timing and number of applications in durum wheat.

Treatment
lack of disease damage assessmente0
Outcome
farmers’ decision-making processe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Irrigated Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“lack of disease damage assessment is the most important component of farmers’ decision-making process with regard to the treatment dates and number of fungicide applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1808 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An integrated Septoria leaf blotch management program should be implemented in irrigated durum wheat areas by varying cultural practices.

Outcome
integrated Septoria leaf blotch disease management programe0
Qualifier
by varying cultural practices optionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Implementing a suitable integrated Septoria leaf blotch disease management program in irrigated durum wheat areas should be sought by varying cultural practices options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–1978 · show in text ↑

fungicide · Zymoseptoria tritici · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.