Paper · 2016 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of different tillage systems and plant densities in corn silage yield

Mohseni Masoud; Hossein Haddadi Mohammad

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to investigate tillage systems and plant densities effects on corn (Zea mays L.cv.sc704) silage yield and component after harvesting wheat, an experiment was carried out in randomized complete block design in a strip plot. Treatments were arranged with four replications in Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center Station of Dashte-Naz in Mazandran, Iran, for two years in 2012 and 2013. Tillage systems had three levels: 1. Plow and Disk system (PDS). 2. Disk system (DS). 3. No tillage (NT). Other factor was plant density in four levels (70000, 80000, 90000 and 100000 plant/ha). The results indicated that most silage yield (55.62 ton ha-1) was obtained from Plow and Disk system (PDS) in density of 70000 plants/ha, that had no significant difference effects in comparison with No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1 with silage yield of 53.39 ton ha-1. The results also indicated that most dry forage yield (18.09 tons ha-1) was obtained from Disk system (PDS) in density of 70000 plants ha-1 that had no significant difference effects in comparison to No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1 with silage yield of 17.99 ton ha-1. According to results, best treatment was No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1. Key words: Corn, plant density, silage yeild, tillage system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plow and Disk at 70000 plants/ha gave the highest silage yield, 55.62 ton ha-1.

Material
Zea mays L.cv.sc704e1
Treatment
Plow and Disk system (PDS) in density of 70000 plants/hae0
Outcome
silage yielde0
Direction
moste0
Value
55.62 ton ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most silage yield (55.62 ton ha-1) was obtained from Plow and Disk system (PDS) in density of 70000 plants/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–739 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays L.cv.sc704) silage yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest silage yield treatment did not differ significantly from no tillage at 90000 plants ha-1, which yielded 53.39 ton ha-1.

Treatment
No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1e0
Outcome
silage yielde0
Value
53.39 ton ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had no significant difference effects in comparison with No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1 with silage yield of 53.39 ton ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–893 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays L.cv.sc704) silage yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported highest dry forage yield was 18.09 tons ha-1 under the stated disk system at 70000 plants ha-1.

Treatment
Disk system (PDS) in density of 70000 plants ha-1e0
Outcome
dry forage yielde0
Direction
moste0
Value
18.09 tons ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most dry forage yield (18.09 tons ha-1) was obtained from Disk system (PDS) in density of 70000 plants ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays L.cv.sc704) silage yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The dry forage treatment was reported as not significantly different from no tillage at 90000 plants ha-1, with 17.99 ton ha-1 reported for the latter.

Treatment
No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1e0
Outcome
silage yielde0
Value
17.99 ton ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had no significant difference effects in comparison to No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1 with silage yield of 17.99 ton ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1185 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays L.cv.sc704) silage yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify no tillage at 90000 plants ha-1 as the best treatment.

Treatment
No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1e0
Outcome
best treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“best treatment was No tillage system (NT) in density of 90000 plants ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1282 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (Zea mays L.cv.sc704) silage yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.