Paper · 2016 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Chlorophyll, nitrogen and antioxidant activities in Cumaru (Dipteryx odorata (Aubl.) Willd) (Fabaceae) in two water regimes

Moitinho Maltarolo Bruno; Gleyce da Silva Lima Ellen; Resende do Nascimento Vitor; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The Cumaru (Dipteryx odorata (Aubl.) Willd.) is a species used by traditional populations and industries using timber and non-timber forest products. This study aimed to analyze the levels of chlorophyll A, B, total ammonia levels, nitrate, proline, electrolyte leakage and activity of oxidative enzymes in evaluation to tolerance of cumaru plants subjected to drought for 21 days of stress. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse at the Federal Rural University of Amazonia (UFRA), Belém, Pará, in the period from March to July 2015. The results showed a significant decrease in the relative water content of 50.8 and 55% for chlorophyll b, 45% to total chlorophyll and an increase in proline to the plants under drought. There was no significant difference to chlorophyll a, ammonium and nitrate. Increases in electrolyte leak with 22.74% for roots and 39.55% for leaves were observed. The enzyme catalase (CAT) showed a significant increase from the 14th day of the experiment, while changes in superoxide dismutase (SOD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities were observed from the 7th day of the experiment. Cumaru plants are not drought tolerant over 21 days; also, young plants of cumaru respond negatively to conditions of low water availability in the soil. Key words: Drought, oxidative stress, chlorophyll, tolerance, Dipteryx odorata.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased relative water content by 50.8%.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
50.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed a significant decrease in the relative water content of 50.8 and 55% for chlorophyll b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cumaru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“45% to total chlorophyll and an increase in proline to the plants under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased chlorophyll b by 55%.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed a significant decrease in the relative water content of 50.8 and 55% for chlorophyll b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cumaru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“45% to total chlorophyll and an increase in proline to the plants under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased total chlorophyll by 45%.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasee1
Value
45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“45% to total chlorophyll and an increase in proline to the plants under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cumaru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed a significant decrease in the relative water content of 50.8 and 55% for chlorophyll b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased proline.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in proline to the plants under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cumaru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a, ammonium and nitrate showed no significant difference.

Outcome
chlorophyll a, ammonium and nitratee0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference to chlorophyll a, ammonium and nitrate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cumaru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrolyte leakage rose by 22.74% in roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
electrolyte leake0
Direction
Increasese0
Value
22.74%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in electrolyte leak with 22.74% for roots and 39.55% for leaves were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cumaru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrolyte leakage rose by 39.55% in leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
electrolyte leake0
Direction
Increasese0
Value
39.55%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in electrolyte leak with 22.74% for roots and 39.55% for leaves were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cumaru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase activity increased significantly from day 14.

Outcome
catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
from the 14th day of the experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enzyme catalase (CAT) showed a significant increase from the 14th day of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cumaru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD and APX activities changed from day 7.

Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activitiese0
Qualifier
from the 7th day of the experimente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changes in superoxide dismutase (SOD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities were observed from the 7th day of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cumaru”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Young cumaru plants were judged unable to tolerate 21 days of drought.

Outcome
not drought tolerante0
Qualifier
over 21 dayse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dipteryx odorata
Dipteryx odorata · Taxonvincentvosriberalta · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cumaru plants are not drought tolerant over 21 days; also, young plants of cumaru respond negatively to conditions of low water availability in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1276 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Dipteryx odorata (cumaru)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.