Paper · 2016 · PLoS ONE

Liquid Organic Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture: Nutrient Uptake of Organic versus Mineral Fertilizers in Citrus Trees

Belén Martínez-Alcántara; Mary-Rus Martínez-Cuenca; Almudena Bermejo; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
116
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to compare the performance of two liquid organic fertilizers, an animal and a plant-based fertilizer, with mineral fertilization on citrus trees. The source of the fertilizer (mineral or organic) had significant effect in the nutritional status of the organic and conventionally managed mandarins. Nutrient uptake, vegetative growth, carbohydrate synthesis and soil characteristics were analyzed. Results showed that plants fertilized with animal based liquid fertilizers exhibited higher total biomass with a more profuse development of new developing organs (leaves and fibrous roots). Liquid organic fertilization resulted in an increased uptake of macro and micronutrients compared to mineral fertilized trees. Moreover, organic fertilization positively affected the carbohydrate content (fructose, glucose and sucrose) mainly in summer flush leaves. Liquid organic fertilization also resulted in an increase of soil organic matter content. Animal-based fertilizer, due to intrinsic composition, increased total tree biomass and carbohydrate leaves content, and led to lower soil nitrate concentration and higher P and Mg exchangeable in soil extract compared to vegetal-based fertilizer. Therefore, liquid organic fertilizers could be used as an alternative to traditional mineral fertilization in drip irrigated citrus trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer source significantly affected mandarin nutritional status.

Taxon
mandarinse0
Treatment
source of the fertilizer (mineral or organic)e0
Outcome
nutritional statuse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The source of the fertilizer (mineral or organic) had significant effect in the nutritional status of the organic and conventionally managed mandarins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Animal-based liquid fertilizer increased total plant biomass.

Taxon
Citrus TreesCitrust0
Treatment
animal based liquid fertilizerse0
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants fertilized with animal based liquid fertilizers exhibited higher total biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Animal-based liquid fertilizer increased development of new leaves and fibrous roots.

Taxon
Citrus TreesCitrust0
Organ / stage
leaves and fibrous rootse0
Treatment
animal based liquid fertilizerse0
Outcome
development of new developing organs (leaves and fibrous roots)e0
Direction
more profusee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants fertilized with animal based liquid fertilizers exhibited higher total biomass with a more profuse development of new developing organs (leaves and fibrous roots)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid organic fertilization increased macro and micronutrient uptake relative to mineral fertilization.

Taxon
Citrus TreesCitrust0
Treatment
Liquid organic fertilizatione0
Outcome
uptake of macro and micronutrientse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
mineral fertilized treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Liquid organic fertilization resulted in an increased uptake of macro and micronutrients compared to mineral fertilized trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization positively affected fructose, glucose and sucrose content, mainly in summer flush leaves.

Taxon
Citrus TreesCitrust0
Organ / stage
summer flush leavese0
Treatment
organic fertilizatione0
Outcome
carbohydrate content (fructose, glucose and sucrose)e0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilization positively affected the carbohydrate content (fructose, glucose and sucrose) mainly in summer flush leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid organic fertilization increased soil organic matter content.

Taxon
Citrus TreesCitrust0
Treatment
Liquid organic fertilizatione0
Outcome
soil organic matter contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Liquid organic fertilization also resulted in an increase of soil organic matter content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Animal-based fertilizer increased total tree biomass relative to plant-based fertilizer.

Taxon
Citrus TreesCitrust0
Treatment
Animal-based fertilizere0
Outcome
total tree biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
vegetal-based fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Animal-based fertilizer, due to intrinsic composition, increased total tree biomass and carbohydrate leaves content, and led to lower soil nitrate concentration and higher P and Mg exchangeable in soil extract compared to vegetal-based fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Animal-based fertilizer increased leaf carbohydrate content relative to plant-based fertilizer.

Taxon
Citrus TreesCitrust0
Treatment
Animal-based fertilizere0
Outcome
carbohydrate leaves contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
vegetal-based fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Animal-based fertilizer, due to intrinsic composition, increased total tree biomass and carbohydrate leaves content, and led to lower soil nitrate concentration and higher P and Mg exchangeable in soil extract compared to vegetal-based fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Animal-based fertilizer lowered soil nitrate concentration relative to plant-based fertilizer.

Taxon
Citrus TreesCitrust0
Treatment
Animal-based fertilizere0
Outcome
soil nitrate concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
vegetal-based fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Animal-based fertilizer, due to intrinsic composition, increased total tree biomass and carbohydrate leaves content, and led to lower soil nitrate concentration and higher P and Mg exchangeable in soil extract compared to vegetal-based fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Animal-based fertilizer increased exchangeable soil P and Mg relative to plant-based fertilizer.

Taxon
Citrus TreesCitrust0
Treatment
Animal-based fertilizere0
Outcome
P and Mg exchangeable in soil extracte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
vegetal-based fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Animal-based fertilizer, due to intrinsic composition, increased total tree biomass and carbohydrate leaves content, and led to lower soil nitrate concentration and higher P and Mg exchangeable in soil extract compared to vegetal-based fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose liquid organic fertilizers as an alternative to mineral fertilization for drip-irrigated citrus.

Taxon
citrus treesCitruse0
Outcome
liquid organic fertilizers could be used as an alternative to traditional mineral fertilizatione0
Setting
drip irrigatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“liquid organic fertilizers could be used as an alternative to traditional mineral fertilization in drip irrigated citrus trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1367 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · CitrusPositive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · growth · CitrusPositive and negative results

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · CitrusPositive and negative results

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · CitrusResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.