Paper · 2016 · International Journal of Plant Animal and Environmental Sciences

Evaluation of Microbial Consortium for Plant Health Management of Pigeon Pea

L Rajasekhar; Satish Kumar Sain; J Divya

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Diverse mechanisms are involved in the suppression of plant pathogens, which is often indirectly connected with plant growth. Plant growth promoting microorganisms (PGPM) and biological control agents (BCA) are shown to possess secondary beneficial effects that would increase their usefulness as bio-inoculants, regardless of the need for their primary function. Indeed, PGPM, such as Rhizobium spp., can promote plant growth and productivity (primary effect) but have now been shown to also play a role in reducing disease (secondary effect). Conversely, BCA, such as Trichoderma spp. and Pseudomonas spp., can control disease (primary effect) but have recently demonstrated stimulation of plant growth (secondary effect) in the absence of a pathogen. Based on these beneficial plant–microbe interactions, it is possible to develop microbial inoculants for use in agriculture. Dependent on their mode of action and effects, these products can be used as bio fertilizers, plant strengtheners, phytostimulators, and biopesticides. The use of microorganisms and the exploitation of beneficial plant–microbe interactions offer promising and environmentally friendly strategies for conventional and organic agriculture worldwide. Widely studied and most promising antagonists are Trichoderma harzianum (TH), Pseudomonas flourescens (PF), Rhizobium (Rh) and Bacillus subtilis (BS) have been evaluated in our study for plant health management of pigeonpea in different combinations to make consortia. T 1 (TH+PF), T2 (TH+BS), T3 (TH + Rh), T4 (PF+BS), T5 (PF+ Rh), T6 ( Rh+BS) and T7 (TH+PF+ BS + R). These were inoculated by soil application under green house conditions and in reducing the activity of majority soil borne pathogens. Results in this study indicating that the consortia having PGPR (T5, T4 and T3) performed well in the seedling vigor improvement in pigeonpea. Highest fresh weight of plants at 15 and 30 DAS was recorded in treatments T5 (PF+ Rh), (1.480 g) and T4 (PF+BS) (1.323 g). Whereas Treatments T7 (TH+PF+BS+Rh) (86 %), T2 (TH+BS) (82 %) and T5 (PF+Rh) (77 %) have shown remarkable disease reduction. These results are showing role of biological consortia to play in integrated disease management and plant health management of pigeonpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortia T5, T4 and T3 improved pigeonpea seedling vigor.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
T5, T4 and T3e0
Outcome
seedling vigore0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“consortia having PGPR (T5, T4 and T3) performed well in the seedling vigor improvement in pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced 1.480 g fresh plant weight at 15 and 30 days after sowing.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
T5 (PF+ Rh)e0
Outcome
fresh weight of plantse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
1.480 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest fresh weight of plants at 15 and 30 DAS was recorded in treatments T5 (PF+ Rh), (1.480 g) and T4 (PF+BS) (1.323 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1995 · show in text ↑
e1

“seedling vigor improvement in pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1832–1871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced 1.323 g fresh plant weight at 15 and 30 days after sowing.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
T4 (PF+BS)e0
Outcome
fresh weight of plantse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
1.323 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest fresh weight of plants at 15 and 30 DAS was recorded in treatments T5 (PF+ Rh), (1.480 g) and T4 (PF+BS) (1.323 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1995 · show in text ↑
e1

“seedling vigor improvement in pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1832–1871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 reduced disease by 86%.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
T7 (TH+PF+BS+Rh)e0
Outcome
disease reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
86 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments T7 (TH+PF+BS+Rh) (86 %), T2 (TH+BS) (82 %) and T5 (PF+Rh) (77 %) have shown remarkable disease reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“seedling vigor improvement in pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1832–1871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 reduced disease by 82%.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
T2 (TH+BS)e0
Outcome
disease reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
82 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments T7 (TH+PF+BS+Rh) (86 %), T2 (TH+BS) (82 %) and T5 (PF+Rh) (77 %) have shown remarkable disease reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“seedling vigor improvement in pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1832–1871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 reduced disease by 77%.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
T5 (PF+Rh)e0
Outcome
disease reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
77 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments T7 (TH+PF+BS+Rh) (86 %), T2 (TH+BS) (82 %) and T5 (PF+Rh) (77 %) have shown remarkable disease reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2120 · show in text ↑
e1

“seedling vigor improvement in pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1832–1871 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors endorse biological consortia in integrated pigeonpea disease and health management.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
integrated disease management and plant health managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“role of biological consortia to play in integrated disease management and plant health management of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2148–2258 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma harzianum · control · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · control · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · control · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Pseudomonas · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

humidity · growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

humidity · control · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.