Paper · 2016 · Eurasian Soil Science

Changes in the species composition of the rhizosphere and phyllosphere of sugar beet under the impact of biological preparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolites

L. I. Pusenkova; E. Yu. Il’yasova; O. V. Lastochkina; et al.

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The species structure of the mycobiota in the rhizosphere and phyllosphere of sugar beet in ontogenesis was studied. The treatment of the plants with biopreparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolites (Phytosporin-M, Vitaplan, and Albit) were shown to create conditions for the colonization of the plant rhizosphere and phyllosphere by bacteria–antagonists displacing phytopathogenic microorganisms and stimulating plant growth, which induces the transformation of the microbial cenosis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with the three biopreparations promoted colonization of sugar beet rhizosphere and phyllosphere by antagonistic bacteria.

Treatment
biopreparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolitese0
Interactor
bacteria–antagonistse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
colonization of the plant rhizosphere and phyllosphere by bacteria–antagonistse0
Direction
create conditions fore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of the plants with biopreparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolites (Phytosporin-M, Vitaplan, and Albit) were shown to create conditions for the colonization of the plant rhizosphere and phyllosphere by bacteria–antagonists”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–372 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biopreparations displaced phytopathogenic microorganisms from the sugar beet microbiota.

Treatment
biopreparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolitese1
Interactor
phytopathogenic microorganismse0pathogen
Second interactor
bacteria–antagonistse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
phytopathogenic microorganismse0
Direction
displacinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacteria–antagonists displacing phytopathogenic microorganisms and stimulating plant growth, which induces the transformation of the microbial cenosis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment of the plants with biopreparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolites (Phytosporin-M, Vitaplan, and Albit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–253 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biopreparations stimulated sugar beet growth.

Treatment
biopreparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolitese1
Interactor
bacteria–antagonistse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
stimulatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacteria–antagonists displacing phytopathogenic microorganisms and stimulating plant growth, which induces the transformation of the microbial cenosis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment of the plants with biopreparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolites (Phytosporin-M, Vitaplan, and Albit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–253 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biopreparation-associated changes transformed the sugar beet microbial community.

Treatment
biopreparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolitese1
Interactor
bacteria–antagonistse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
transformation of the microbial cenosise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacteria–antagonists displacing phytopathogenic microorganisms and stimulating plant growth, which induces the transformation of the microbial cenosis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment of the plants with biopreparations based on endophytic bacteria and their metabolites (Phytosporin-M, Vitaplan, and Albit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–253 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 7 positive, 17 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

inoculation · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 25 positive, 6 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.