Paper · 1993 · HortScience

FOLIAR NUTRITION OF TOMATOES UNDER SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS USING PLANT MULCHES AND LOW-N INPUT

R. F. Korcak; A. Abdul-Baki; J. Teasdale

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., cv. Sunny) plants were grown in a sustainable agricultural system of mulches: black plastic, paper, hairy vetch, crimson clover, and hairy vetch + rye. Total yields were highest with hairy vetch (85.8 t ha -1 ) and lowest with paper mulch (30.0 t ha -1 ). The low fertilizer input hairy vetch, crimson clover and hairy vetch + rye treatments received one-half the N-P-K fertigation that was applied to other treatments. Immediately before mowing the cover crops, samples were analyzed. Five weeks after transplanting the tomatoes and at the end of 12 weeks, leaf samples were analyzed for macro- and micro-nutrients. Results of the cover crop analyses indicated minimal differences in N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, B, and Fe concentrations. Tomato leaf analyses at 5 weeks after field planting showed that, among the macro-nutrients, only K was significantly higher in the hairy vetch, hairy vetch + rye, crimson clover, and black plastic treatments than in bare soil and paper mulch. End-of-season leaf analyses showed that significantly higher K was found in the vetch + rye treatment compared to all other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch gave the highest total yield, 85.8 t ha -1.

Treatment
hairy vetche0
Outcome
Total yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
85.8 t ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total yields were highest with hairy vetch (85.8 t ha -1 ) and lowest with paper mulch (30.0 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paper mulch gave the lowest total yield, 30.0 t ha -1.

Treatment
paper mulche0
Outcome
Total yieldse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
30.0 t ha -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total yields were highest with hairy vetch (85.8 t ha -1 ) and lowest with paper mulch (30.0 t ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop nutrient concentrations differed minimally.

Outcome
minimal differences in N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, B, and Fe concentrationse0
Direction
minimal differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of the cover crop analyses indicated minimal differences in N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Mn, B, and Fe concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At five weeks, tomato leaf K was higher under hairy vetch, vetch plus rye, crimson clover, and black plastic than bare soil and paper mulch.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
hairy vetch, hairy vetch + rye, crimson clover, and black plastic treatmentse0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at 5 weeks after field plantinge0
Comparator
bare soil and paper mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato leaf analyses at 5 weeks after field planting showed that, among the macro-nutrients, only K was significantly higher in the hairy vetch, hairy vetch + rye, crimson clover, and black plastic treatments than in bare soil and paper mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At season end, vetch plus rye produced higher tomato leaf K than all other treatments.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
vetch + rye treatmente0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
End-of-seasone0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“End-of-season leaf analyses showed that significantly higher K was found in the vetch + rye treatment compared to all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 20–26 · show in text ↑

Vicia villosa · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.