Paper · 2016 · HortScience

No Tillage and Strip Tillage Effects on Plant Performance, Weed Suppression, and Profitability in Transitional Organic Broccoli Production

Dana Jokela; Ajay Nair

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Organic no-till and strip-till systems have gained attention because of their reported capacity to enhance soil health and suppress annual weeds. This study, conducted at the Horticulture Research Station, Ames, IA, over 2 years (2013–14 and 2014–15) compared a cover crop–based no tillage (NT), strip tillage (ST), and conventional tillage (CT) in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production, with data collected on broccoli yield and quality, plant health, weed suppression, soil temperature, and cost of production. A cover crop mixture of cereal rye ( Secale cereal e L.) and hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth.) was seeded in all plots in September, and was ended by rolling and crimping (NT and ST) or soil incorporation (CT) in late spring the following year. Each whole-plot tillage treatment was split into two subplot fertility treatments—one based entirely on organic preplant granular fertilizer, and the other split between preplant granular fertilizer and postplanting fertigation—to test the effect of fertigation on yield and plant growth under the typically nitrogen (N)-limited reduced tillage conditions. In 2014, yield of broccoli was highest in CT treatments, averaging 5.4 t·ha −1 , with no difference between ST and NT treatments. In 2015, yields were equal among tillage treatments, averaging 20.0 t·ha −1 . Changing the timing of fertilizer application through the use of fertigation did not affect yield. Weed density and biomass were lowest in the between-row (BR) regions of NT and ST plots in 2014, indicating effective early-season weed suppression. In 2015, NT and ST plots generally had lower weed biomass and density compared with CT plots, but weed growth in BR and in-row (IR) regions of NT and ST plots was similar. Soil temperature was highest in CT plots throughout the year, and higher in ST than in NT plots only during some periods. While production costs did vary slightly across treatments, profit per hectare was most strongly affected by yield. Our findings suggest that cover crop–based organic NT and ST systems may be viable options for organic broccoli growers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2014, broccoli yield was highest under conventional tillage, averaging 5.4 t·ha −1.

Treatment
CT treatmentse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.4 t·ha −1e1
Qualifier
In 2014e1
Comparator
ST and NT treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In 2014, yield of broccoli was highest in CT treatments, averaging 5.4 t·ha −1 , with no difference between ST and NT treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1285 · show in text ↑
e0

“in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2014, broccoli yield did not differ between strip tillage and no tillage.

Treatment
STe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
no differencee1
Qualifier
In 2014e1
Comparator
NT treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In 2014, yield of broccoli was highest in CT treatments, averaging 5.4 t·ha −1 , with no difference between ST and NT treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1285 · show in text ↑
e0

“in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2015, broccoli yields were equal among tillage treatments, averaging 20.0 t·ha −1.

Treatment
tillage treatmentse2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
equale2
Value
20.0 t·ha −1e2
Qualifier
In 2015e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“In 2015, yields were equal among tillage treatments, averaging 20.0 t·ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1362 · show in text ↑
e0

“in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing fertilizer timing through fertigation did not affect broccoli yield.

Treatment
fertigatione3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
did not affecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Changing the timing of fertilizer application through the use of fertigation did not affect yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1462 · show in text ↑
e0

“in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2014, weed density and biomass were lowest between the rows of no-till and strip-till broccoli plots.

Treatment
NT and ST plotse4
Interactor
Weede4weed
Outcome
Weed density and biomasse4
Direction
loweste4
Qualifier
between-row (BR) regionse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Weed density and biomass were lowest in the between-row (BR) regions of NT and ST plots in 2014, indicating effective early-season weed suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1611 · show in text ↑
e0

“in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2015, no-till and strip-till broccoli plots generally had lower weed biomass and density than conventional tillage plots.

Treatment
NT and ST plotse5
Interactor
weede5weed
Outcome
weed biomass and densitye5
Direction
lowere5
Comparator
CT plotse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In 2015, NT and ST plots generally had lower weed biomass and density compared with CT plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1705 · show in text ↑
e0

“in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2015, weed growth between the rows and in the in-row region of no-till and strip-till plots was similar.

Treatment
NT and ST plotse6
Interactor
weede6weed
Outcome
weed growthe6
Direction
similare6
Qualifier
BRe6
Comparator
in-row (IR) regionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“but weed growth in BR and in-row (IR) regions of NT and ST plots was similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1783 · show in text ↑
e0

“in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil temperature was highest in conventional tillage plots throughout the year.

Treatment
CT plotse7
Outcome
Soil temperaturee7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Soil temperature was highest in CT plots throughout the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1845 · show in text ↑
e0

“in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil temperature was higher in strip tillage than in no-till plots only during some periods.

Treatment
STe1
Outcome
Soil temperaturee7
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
only during some periodse1
Comparator
NT plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“higher in ST than in NT plots only during some periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1851–1905 · show in text ↑
e7

“Soil temperature was highest in CT plots throughout the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1845 · show in text ↑
e0

“in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–427 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profit per hectare in organic broccoli was most strongly affected by yield.

Outcome
profit per hectaree2
Qualifier
by yielde2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“profit per hectare was most strongly affected by yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–2021 · show in text ↑
e0

“in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–427 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cover-crop based organic no-till and strip-till systems may be viable options for organic broccoli growers.

Outcome
viable options for organic broccoli growerse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“may be viable options for organic broccoli growers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2092–2142 · show in text ↑
e0

“in transitional organic broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L. var. italica ) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–427 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

tillage · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 17 positive, 15 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 445 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.