Paper · 2016 · Agriculture (Pol nohospodárstvo)

Effect of Cadmium on Growth, Photosynthetic Pigments, Iron and Cadmium Accumulation of Faba Bean (Vicia faba cv. Aštar)

Beáta Piršelová; Roman Kuna; Peter Lukáč; et al.

12
claims
32
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The influence of different concentrations of cadmium (Cd) ions (50 and 100 mg/kg soil) on growth, photosynthetic pigment content, Cd, and iron accumulation in faba bean ( Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar) was studied under laboratory conditions. No significant changes were observed in the growth parameters of shoots (length, fresh, and dry weight). Both tested Cd doses resulted in decrease in root fresh weight by 31.7% and 28.68% and in dry weight by 32.2% and 33.33%, respectively. Increased accumulation of Cd was observed in roots (125- and 173-fold higher than in control) and shoots (125- and 150-fold higher than in control) as a result of applied doses of Cd. Increased accumulation of iron was detected in roots (1.45- and 1.69-fold higher than in control). Decrease in the content of chlorophyll a (by 25.52 and 24.83%, respectively) and chlorophyll b (by 6.90%) after application of Cd 100 as well as decrease in carotenoids (by 40.39 and 38.36%, respectively) was detected. Weak translocation of Cd from roots to shoots pointed to low phytoremediation potential of the tested bean variety in contaminated soil. However, the high tolerance of this cultivar, its relative fast growth, as well as priority of Cd accumulation in roots presume this plant species for phytostabilisation and revegetation of the Cd-contaminated soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot growth parameters did not change significantly under tested Cd doses.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae1
Material
Aštare1
Treatment
cadmiume2
Outcome
growth parameters of shoots (length, fresh, and dry weight)e0
Direction
No significant changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant changes were observed in the growth parameters of shoots (length, fresh, and dry weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–349 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“cadmium (Cd) ions (50 and 100 mg/kg soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd at 50 mg/kg reduced root fresh weight by 31.7%.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae2
Treatment
50e1
Outcome
root fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
31.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both tested Cd doses resulted in decrease in root fresh weight by 31.7% and 28.68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“50 and 100 mg/kg soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd at 100 mg/kg reduced root fresh weight by 28.68%.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae2
Treatment
100 mg/kg soile1
Outcome
root fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
28.68%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both tested Cd doses resulted in decrease in root fresh weight by 31.7% and 28.68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“50 and 100 mg/kg soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Cd doses reduced root dry weight by 32.2% and 33.33%, respectively.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae2
Treatment
Cd dosese1
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
decreasee1
Value
32.2% and 33.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in dry weight by 32.2% and 33.33%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–485 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both tested Cd doses resulted in decrease in root fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–413 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd accumulated in roots 125- and 173-fold above control for the two doses.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae1
Treatment
Cde0
Outcome
accumulation of Cd was observed in rootse0
Direction
Increasede0
Value
125- and 173-folde0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased accumulation of Cd was observed in roots (125- and 173-fold higher than in control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–580 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd accumulated in shoots 125- and 150-fold above control for the two doses.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae1
Treatment
applied doses of Cde0
Outcome
shootse0
Direction
highere0
Value
125- and 150-folde0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots (125- and 150-fold higher than in control) as a result of applied doses of Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–669 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron accumulated in roots 1.45- and 1.69-fold above control.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae1
Treatment
Cde2
Outcome
accumulation of iron was detected in rootse0
Direction
Increasede0
Value
1.45- and 1.69-folde0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased accumulation of iron was detected in roots (1.45- and 1.69-fold higher than in control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–203 · show in text ↑
e2

“cadmium (Cd) ions (50 and 100 mg/kg soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a declined by 25.52 and 24.83% under the Cd doses.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae1
Treatment
Cde2
Outcome
content of chlorophyll ae0
Direction
Decreasee0
Value
25.52 and 24.83%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decrease in the content of chlorophyll a (by 25.52 and 24.83%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–846 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–203 · show in text ↑
e2

“cadmium (Cd) ions (50 and 100 mg/kg soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd 100 reduced chlorophyll b by 6.90%.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae2
Treatment
Cd 100e0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
Decreasee1
Value
6.90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll b (by 6.90%) after application of Cd 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–903 · show in text ↑
e1

“Decrease in the content of chlorophyll a”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–810 · show in text ↑
e2

“Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carotenoids declined by 40.39 and 38.36% under Cd.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae1
Treatment
Cde2
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
40.39 and 38.36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in carotenoids (by 40.39 and 38.36%, respectively) was detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–203 · show in text ↑
e2

“cadmium (Cd) ions (50 and 100 mg/kg soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weak Cd transfer from root to shoot indicated low phytoremediation potential.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae1
Outcome
low phytoremediation potentiale0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weak translocation of Cd from roots to shoots pointed to low phytoremediation potential of the tested bean variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–203 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors proposed this bean for phytostabilisation and revegetation of Cd-contaminated soils.

Taxon
Vicia faba L. cv. AštarVicia fabae1
Outcome
phytostabilisation and revegetation of the Cd-contaminated soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“presume this plant species for phytostabilisation and revegetation of the Cd-contaminated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1341 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vicia faba L. cv. Aštar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–203 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 3 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

cadmium atom · molecular: metabolites · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

cadmium atom · physiology: pigments · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

soil · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.