Paper · 1984 · Kyushu Plant Protection Research

Evaluation of solar heating (solarization) and chemicals for the control of bacterial wilt of potato.

Katsumi KATAYAMA; Sadao KIMURA; Toshinori SHINSU

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

For the control of bacterial wilt of potato in the fall cropping caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum, chloropicrin injection treatment into soil at the rate of 30l/10a followed by covering with polyethylene film over the whole treated area of the field was found to be more effective than dazomet at 30kg/10a and chloropicrin at 10l/10a or 20l/10a with polyethy-lene-covering. And the effect of chloropicrin 10l/10a or 20l/10a with polyethylene-covering was as well as that of chloropicrin 30l/10a without polyethylene-covering. Solarization, namely heating the field soil by mulching with a transparent polyethylene film over the soil sur-face in the summer season gave good control in two experiment fields out of the five fields tested. The biovar II strain of P. solanacearum was detected only in the fields where the control was not effective. But only the biovar IV strain was isolated in the fields where solarization was effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloropicrin injection at 30 l/10a with polyethylene covering was more effective against potato bacterial wilt than dazomet at 30 kg/10a.

Treatment
chloropicrin injection treatment into soil at the rate of 30l/10a followed by covering with polyethylene filme1
Interactor
Pseudomonas solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
control of bacterial wilte0
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
dazomet at 30kg/10ae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the control of bacterial wilt of potato in the fall cropping caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“chloropicrin injection treatment into soil at the rate of 30l/10a followed by covering with polyethylene film over the whole treated area of the field was found to be more effective than dazomet at 30kg/10a and chloropicrin at 10l/10a or 20l/10a with polyethy-lene-covering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloropicrin at 10 or 20 l/10a with polyethylene covering was as effective against potato bacterial wilt as chloropicrin at 30 l/10a without covering.

Treatment
chloropicrin 10l/10a or 20l/10a with polyethylene-coveringe2
Interactor
Pseudomonas solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
effecte2
Direction
as well ase2
Comparator
chloropicrin 30l/10a without polyethylene-coveringe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the control of bacterial wilt of potato in the fall cropping caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“And the effect of chloropicrin 10l/10a or 20l/10a with polyethylene-covering was as well as that of chloropicrin 30l/10a without polyethylene-covering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–526 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biovar II strain of Pseudomonas solanacearum was detected only in fields where the control was not effective.

Material
biovar II straine4
Interactor
P. solanacearume4pathogen
Outcome
detectede4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bacterial wilt of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“The biovar II strain of P. solanacearum was detected only in the fields where the control was not effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–846 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the biovar IV strain was isolated in fields where solarization was effective.

Material
biovar IV straine5
Outcome
isolatede5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bacterial wilt of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“But only the biovar IV strain was isolated in the fields where solarization was effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–937 · show in text ↑

chloropicrin · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 67 positive, 10 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.