Paper · 2016 · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Optimization of foramsulfuron doses for post-emergence weed control in maize (Zea mays L.)

Euro Pannacci

13
claims
20
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Four field experiments were carried out from 2011 to 2014 in order to evaluate the effects of foramsulfuron, applied at the recommended (60.8 g a.i./ha) and reduced doses (1/3 and 2/3), on the efficacy against several of the most important weeds in maize. For each “year-weed” combination, dose-response curves were applied to estimate the dose of foramsulfuron required to obtain 90% and 95% weed control (ED90 and ED95). Foramsulfuron phytotoxicity on maize and crop yield were assessed. Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha) provided 95% efficacy against redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.), wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) and black nightshade (Solanum nigrum L.). Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.) were satisfactorily controlled (95% weed efficacy) with ED95 ranged from 20 to 50 g/ha of foramsulfuron (about from 1/3 to 5/6 of the recommended dose) depending on growth stage. The recommended dose was effective against pale smartweed (Polygonum lapathifolium L.) at 2-4 true leaves (12-14 BBCH scale), but this dose did not kill plants larger than 2-4 true leaves. The ranking among weed species based on their susceptibility to foramsulfuron was: redroot pigweed = green foxtail = wild mustard = black nightshade > velvetleaf = common lambsquarters = barnyardgrass > pale smartweed. Dose of foramsulfuron can be reduced below recommended dose depending on weed species and growth stage. Foramsulfuron showed a good crop selectivity and had no negative effect on maize yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha) provided 95% efficacy against redroot pigweed.

Taxon
redroot pigweede1
Treatment
Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha)e0
Outcome
efficacye0
Value
95%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha) provided 95% efficacy against”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha) provided 95% efficacy against green foxtail.

Taxon
green foxtaile1
Treatment
Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha)e0
Outcome
efficacye0
Value
95%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha) provided 95% efficacy against”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“green foxtail (Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha) provided 95% efficacy against wild mustard.

Taxon
wild mustarde1
Treatment
Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha)e0
Outcome
efficacye0
Value
95%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha) provided 95% efficacy against”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha) provided 95% efficacy against black nightshade.

Taxon
black nightshadeSolanum nigrume1
Treatment
Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha)e0
Outcome
efficacye0
Value
95%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum nigrum
Solanum nigrum · TaxonHladac · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foramsulfuron at 1/3 of the recommended dose (20.3 g a.i./ha) provided 95% efficacy against”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“black nightshade (Solanum nigrum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvetleaf was satisfactorily controlled (95% efficacy) with an ED95 of 20 to 50 g/ha of foramsulfuron depending on growth stage.

Taxon
VelvetleafAbutilon theophrastie1
Treatment
foramsulfurone0
Outcome
ED95e0
Value
20 to 50 g/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · TaxonI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were satisfactorily controlled (95% weed efficacy) with ED95 ranged from 20 to 50 g/ha of foramsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common lambsquarters was satisfactorily controlled (95% efficacy) with an ED95 of 20 to 50 g/ha of foramsulfuron depending on growth stage.

Taxon
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume1
Treatment
foramsulfurone0
Outcome
ED95e0
Value
20 to 50 g/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were satisfactorily controlled (95% weed efficacy) with ED95 ranged from 20 to 50 g/ha of foramsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barnyardgrass was satisfactorily controlled (95% efficacy) with an ED95 of 20 to 50 g/ha of foramsulfuron depending on growth stage.

Taxon
barnyardgrassEchinochloa crus-gallie1
Treatment
foramsulfurone0
Outcome
ED95e0
Value
20 to 50 g/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · TaxonMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were satisfactorily controlled (95% weed efficacy) with ED95 ranged from 20 to 50 g/ha of foramsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended foramsulfuron dose was effective against pale smartweed at 2-4 true leaves (12-14 BBCH scale).

Taxon
pale smartweede0
Treatment
The recommended dosee0
Outcome
effectivee0
Qualifier
2-4 true leaves (12-14 BBCH scale)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The recommended dose was effective against pale smartweed (Polygonum lapathifolium L.) at 2-4 true leaves (12-14 BBCH scale), but this dose did not kill plants larger than 2-4 true leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended foramsulfuron dose did not kill pale smartweed plants larger than 2-4 true leaves.

Taxon
pale smartweede0
Treatment
The recommended dosee0
Outcome
kille0
Direction
did not kille0
Qualifier
plants larger than 2-4 true leavese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The recommended dose was effective against pale smartweed (Polygonum lapathifolium L.) at 2-4 true leaves (12-14 BBCH scale), but this dose did not kill plants larger than 2-4 true leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1256 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed species were ranked by susceptibility to foramsulfuron: redroot pigweed = green foxtail = wild mustard = black nightshade > velvetleaf = common lambsquarters = barnyardgrass > pale smartweed.

Taxon
weed speciese0
Outcome
susceptibility to foramsulfurone0
Qualifier
redroot pigweed = green foxtail = wild mustard = black nightshade > velvetleaf = common lambsquarters = barnyardgrass > pale smartweede0

Verbatim

e0

“The ranking among weed species based on their susceptibility to foramsulfuron was: redroot pigweed = green foxtail = wild mustard = black nightshade > velvetleaf = common lambsquarters = barnyardgrass > pale smartweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1475 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the foramsulfuron dose can be reduced below the recommended dose depending on weed species and growth stage.

Taxon
weed speciese0
Outcome
Dose of foramsulfuron can be reduced below recommended dosee0
Qualifier
depending on weed species and growth stagee0

Verbatim

e0

“Dose of foramsulfuron can be reduced below recommended dose depending on weed species and growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron showed good crop selectivity in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Foramsulfurone0
Outcome
crop selectivitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foramsulfuron showed a good crop selectivity and had no negative effect on maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foramsulfuron had no negative effect on maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Foramsulfurone0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
no negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foramsulfuron showed a good crop selectivity and had no negative effect on maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1667 · show in text ↑

foramsulfuron · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

foramsulfuron · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.