Paper · 2016 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORESTRY AND CROP IMPROVEMENT

Adoption behaviour and constraints in wheat production technologies in saline area of Gir Somnath district of Gujarat

ANSHUMAN D. RATHOD; SATISH T. HADIYAL; BRIJENDRA SINGH RAJAWAT

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was carried out to determine the farmers adoption behaviour on wheat production technologies. The farmers were selected from saline area of Gir Somnath district in Gujarat and were demonstrated production technology during 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14. It was revealed that 36.8 per cent farmers fully adopted demonstrated wheat production technology. Whereas, 21.5 per cent farmers adopted partially.The major constraints observed in wheat production was salt affected soil as well as poor quality of irrigation water. In wheat, with salt affected soil, salt tolerant wheat variety (KRL-19) yielded 34 to 43 per cent higher yield than farmers' practice. The B:C ratio of demonstrated plots under salt affected soil were observed 4.05, 4.03 and 4.21, respectively during three years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

36.8 per cent of farmers fully adopted the demonstrated wheat technology.

Outcome
farmers fully adopted demonstrated wheat production technologye0
Value
36.8 per cente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“36.8 per cent farmers fully adopted demonstrated wheat production technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

21.5 per cent of farmers partially adopted the demonstrated wheat technology.

Outcome
farmers adopted partiallye0
Value
21.5 per cente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“21.5 per cent farmers adopted partially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–410 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-affected soil was a major constraint on wheat production.

Outcome
salt affected soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major constraints observed in wheat production was salt affected soil as well as poor quality of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–528 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poor irrigation water quality was a major constraint on wheat production.

Outcome
poor quality of irrigation watere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major constraints observed in wheat production was salt affected soil as well as poor quality of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-tolerant KRL-19 wheat yielded 34 to 43 per cent more than farmer practice on salt-affected soil.

Material
KRL-19e0
Treatment
salt tolerant wheat variety (KRL-19)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
34 to 43 per cente0
Qualifier
salt affected soile0
Comparator
farmers' practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat, with salt affected soil, salt tolerant wheat variety (KRL-19) yielded 34 to 43 per cent higher yield than farmers' practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–663 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The demonstrated wheat plots had a B:C ratio of 4.05 in the first year.

Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
4.05e0
Qualifier
under salt affected soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The B:C ratio of demonstrated plots under salt affected soil were observed 4.05, 4.03 and 4.21, respectively during three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The demonstrated wheat plots had a B:C ratio of 4.03 in the second year.

Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
4.03e0
Qualifier
under salt affected soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The B:C ratio of demonstrated plots under salt affected soil were observed 4.05, 4.03 and 4.21, respectively during three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The demonstrated wheat plots had a B:C ratio of 4.21 in the third year.

Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Value
4.21e0
Qualifier
under salt affected soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The B:C ratio of demonstrated plots under salt affected soil were observed 4.05, 4.03 and 4.21, respectively during three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–43 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 197 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.