Paper · 1983 · Japanese Journal of Crop Science

Grain Production and Dry Matter Partition in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Response to Water Deficits during the Whole Grain-Filling Period

Tohru KOBATA; Shin-ichi TAKAMI

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The grain growth of rice is highly tolerant to water stress throughout the grain-filling period. Despite a large reduction in dry matter production, the grain growth during both the period of active cell division and expansion, and the subsequent period of rapid starch deposition was little affected by water deficits. Reduction in dry matter production due to water stress was almost completely compensated by the increased transfer of reserved assimilates to the grain. But, the plants which experienced drought during the early stage of grain growth and were relieved from the stress thereafter yielded less than the plants which were well watered throughout the grain-filling period. Similar response was observed in wheat, and a deteriorated root function in stressed plants is suggested as a possible factor for this reduced grain yield. It is therefore probable that the yield reduction in rice associated with prolonged drought during the period of grain-filling is a result of the indirect effects of water stress through the function of roots with regard to the production of hormonal substances. However, in view of the highly tolerant nature of the short term grain growth to water deficits, it is more likely that the lack of assimilate supply to the grain is responsible for reduced grain yield in plants under prolonged stress, since there must be an upper limit to the amount of pre-anthesis reserves that can be available for grain growth. This situation has been clearly demonstrated with maize. The objective of this study was to examine the above premise, i.e., the total assimlate supply is the primary factor that controls grain yield in rice droughted during most of the grain-filling period. Rice plants (Oryza sativa L. cv. Nipponbare) were grown in wooden trays (1.05×1.20×0.15 m) containing sandy silt soil. The trays were placed in a vinyl-covered house located in a field and so arranged to form a block of miniature crops that simulates a field density of 95, 200 plants/10a. Part of the block was adequately watered throughout the whole growing period, while water application to the remaining block was restricted after ear emergence so that leaf water potential around midday was maintained at -10 to -15 bars. At intervals during the treatment period, water potential was measured on the flag leaves between 1300 and 1500 hours. During this period, areas of green leaves and grain growth were also monitored. Dry weights of grains, shoots and roots were determined both at the time of ear emergence and at maturity. Daytime water potential in the leaves of stressed plants declined rapidly after the start of treatment, reaching -12 bars 10 days after ear emergence (Fig. 2). Leaf water potentials in the control plants remained at -3 to -6 bars except at the later stage of the growth. Leaf senescence was accelerated in stressed plants, LAI reaching less than 50% of the initial value by the 20th clay after ear emergence, whereas the controls still retained the green leaves of about 60% of the initial value until the full-ripe stage (Fig. 3). Water deficits reduced the dry matter production by approximately 40% (Tables 2 and 3) through the reduction in both the leaf area duration and the average rate of dry matter production (Table 4). Despite this, the grain yield of desiccated plants was only reduce by 16% (Tables 1 and 2), due to the increased assimilate transfer from the shoots to the grain (Tables 2 and 3). Thus the apparent contribution of reserves to grain yield was 34% in the desiccated plants, about three times as high as in the controls (Table 3.). These findings are in agreement with our earlier studies; the grain growth for the first 10 to 20 days after ear emergence was only slightly affected by the water stress (Fig. 4). However, the rate of grain growth declined as the water stress was prolonged. [the rest omitted]

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain growth of rice was little affected by water deficits during the grain-filling period.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
water deficitse2
Outcome
grain growthe2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e2

“the grain growth during both the period of active cell division and expansion, and the subsequent period of rapid starch deposition was little affected by water deficits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduction in dry matter production under water stress was almost completely compensated by increased transfer of reserved assimilates to the grain in rice.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
water stresse3
Outcome
transfer of reserved assimilates to the graine3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e3

“Reduction in dry matter production due to water stress was almost completely compensated by the increased transfer of reserved assimilates to the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice plants with drought early in grain filling that were then relieved yielded less than well-watered plants.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
drought during the early stage of grain growthe4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
lesse4
Comparator
well watered throughout the grain-filling periode4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e4

“the plants which experienced drought during the early stage of grain growth and were relieved from the stress thereafter yielded less than the plants which were well watered throughout the grain-filling period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–687 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reduction in rice under prolonged drought is probably an indirect effect of water stress acting through root function and hormonal substance production.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
prolonged droughte5
Outcome
yield reductione5
Qualifier
indirect effects of water stress through the function of roots with regard to the production of hormonal substancese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e5

“It is therefore probable that the yield reduction in rice associated with prolonged drought during the period of grain-filling is a result of the indirect effects of water stress through the function of roots with regard to the production of hormonal substances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A similar response to water stress during grain filling was observed in wheat.

Outcome
Similar responsee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Similar response was observed in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–727 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A deteriorated root function in stressed plants is suggested as a possible factor for reduced rice grain yield.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Outcome
reduced grain yielde6
Qualifier
a deteriorated root function in stressed plantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e6

“a deteriorated root function in stressed plants is suggested as a possible factor for this reduced grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–843 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Lack of assimilate supply to the grain is more likely responsible for reduced grain yield in rice under prolonged stress.

Taxon
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
prolonged stresse7
Outcome
reduced grain yielde7
Qualifier
the lack of assimilate supply to the graine7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–67 · show in text ↑
e7

“it is more likely that the lack of assimilate supply to the grain is responsible for reduced grain yield in plants under prolonged stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1342 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

282 papers: 98 positive, 184 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 182 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

278 papers more in this group

See all 282 papers →

drought · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

325 papers: 76 positive, 249 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

321 papers more in this group

See all 325 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.