Paper · 2015 · Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology

Beneficial Microbes and Phosphorus Management Influence Dry Matter Partitioning and Accumulation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with and without Moisture Stress Condition

Siddique Khan; Asim Muhammad

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of beneficial microorganism (BMO) and phosphorus (P) application on dry matter (DM) accumulation and partitioning in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L., cv. Siren) under full irrigated (no moisture stress) and limited irrigated (dryland or moisture stress) conditions. The experiment was conducted at the Agronomy Research Farm, The University of Agriculture Peshawar during winter 2012-13. The experiment under both moisture conditions was laid out in randomized complete block design using three replications. The results revealed that DM accumulation and partitioning into leaf, stem and spike was significantly higher in wheat under irrigated than dryland wheat. The treated plots (rest) had higher total DM accumulation and partitioned more DM into leaf, stem and spike than control at both anthesis and physiological maturity (PM). Application of P and BMO at the highest rates (90 kg P ha -1 and 30 L ha -1 , respectively) had accumulated more total DM and had partitioned more DM into leaf, stem and spike at the two growth stages. We found that under irrigated condition, increase in both P and BMO levels (90 kg P ha -1 and 30 L ha -1 , respectively) and under dryland condition the intermediate levels of both P and BMO (60 kg P ha -1 and 20 L ha -1 , respectively) had produced higher total DM and partitioned more DM into various parts at both anthesis and PM. The percent DM partitioning into leaf was more (36%) than stem and spike (each 32%) at anthesis stage; while at PM, more DM was partitioned into spike (59%) than stem (21%) and leaf (20%). Increase in DM partitioning into spike under both irrigated and dryland wheat with proper P and BMO management showed positive relationship with grain yield that resulted in higher growers income in the study area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated wheat had significantly higher dry matter accumulation and allocation to leaf, stem and spike than dryland wheat.

Treatment
irrigatede0
Outcome
DM accumulation and partitioning into leaf, stem and spikee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
dryland wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DM accumulation and partitioning into leaf, stem and spike was significantly higher in wheat under irrigated than dryland wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated plots accumulated and allocated more dry matter than controls at anthesis and maturity.

Organ / stage
anthesis and physiological maturity (PM)e0
Treatment
treated plots (rest)e0
Outcome
total DM accumulation and partitioned more DM into leaf, stem and spikee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treated plots (rest) had higher total DM accumulation and partitioned more DM into leaf, stem and spike than control at both anthesis and physiological maturity (PM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest P and BMO rates increased total and allocated dry matter at both stages.

Treatment
P and BMO at the highest rates (90 kg P ha -1 and 30 L ha -1 , respectively)e0
Outcome
total DM and had partitioned more DM into leaf, stem and spikee0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P and BMO at the highest rates (90 kg P ha -1 and 30 L ha -1 , respectively) had accumulated more total DM and had partitioned more DM into leaf, stem and spike at the two growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

90 kg P ha -1 and 30 L ha -1 under irrigated condition produced higher total and allocated dry matter.

Treatment
90 kg P ha -1 and 30 L ha -1e0
Outcome
total DM and partitioned more DM into various partse0
Direction
highere0
Setting
irrigated conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under irrigated condition, increase in both P and BMO levels (90 kg P ha -1 and 30 L ha -1 , respectively) and under dryland condition the intermediate levels of both P and BMO (60 kg P ha -1 and 20 L ha -1 , respectively) had produced higher total DM and partitioned more DM into various parts at both anthesis and PM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

60 kg P ha -1 and 20 L ha -1 under dryland condition produced higher total and allocated dry matter.

Treatment
60 kg P ha -1 and 20 L ha -1e0
Outcome
total DM and partitioned more DM into various partse0
Direction
highere0
Setting
dryland conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under irrigated condition, increase in both P and BMO levels (90 kg P ha -1 and 30 L ha -1 , respectively) and under dryland condition the intermediate levels of both P and BMO (60 kg P ha -1 and 20 L ha -1 , respectively) had produced higher total DM and partitioned more DM into various parts at both anthesis and PM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter allocation to leaf at anthesis was 36%.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
DM partitioninge0
Value
36%e0
Qualifier
anthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent DM partitioning into leaf was more (36%) than stem and spike (each 32%) at anthesis stage; while at PM, more DM was partitioned into spike (59%) than stem (21%) and leaf (20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter allocation to stem and spike at anthesis was 32%.

Organ / stage
stem and spikee0
Outcome
DM partitioninge0
Value
32%e0
Qualifier
anthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent DM partitioning into leaf was more (36%) than stem and spike (each 32%) at anthesis stage; while at PM, more DM was partitioned into spike (59%) than stem (21%) and leaf (20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter allocation to spike at PM was 59%.

Organ / stage
spikee0
Outcome
DM partitioninge0
Value
59%e0
Qualifier
PMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent DM partitioning into leaf was more (36%) than stem and spike (each 32%) at anthesis stage; while at PM, more DM was partitioned into spike (59%) than stem (21%) and leaf (20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter allocation to stem at PM was 21%.

Organ / stage
steme0
Outcome
DM partitioninge0
Value
21%e0
Qualifier
PMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent DM partitioning into leaf was more (36%) than stem and spike (each 32%) at anthesis stage; while at PM, more DM was partitioned into spike (59%) than stem (21%) and leaf (20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter allocation to leaf at PM was 20%.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
DM partitioninge0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
PMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent DM partitioning into leaf was more (36%) than stem and spike (each 32%) at anthesis stage; while at PM, more DM was partitioned into spike (59%) than stem (21%) and leaf (20%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike dry matter allocation was positively associated with grain yield and income.

Organ / stage
spikee0
Treatment
proper P and BMO managemente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in DM partitioning into spike under both irrigated and dryland wheat with proper P and BMO management showed positive relationship with grain yield that resulted in higher growers income in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–128 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.