Paper · 2010 · Guangxi nongye kexue

N-releasing characteristics of different kinds of controlled-release urea and their effects on the sugarcane

Lei Wang; Zhou LiuQiang; Xie RuLin; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present experiment was undertaken in order to study the N-releasing characteristics of different kinds of controlled-release urea and their effects on the sugarcane.Five treatments,viz.CK,normal urea,resin coated urea,sulfur coated urea and the mixture of the coated urea have been applied in the sugarcane field,and the fertilizer packages were buried into field at the same time.The result showed that the Elovich equation could fit the process of N releasing from resin coated urea with good results(r=0.9796**-0.9944**).It was found more N was released at the early stage,and less at a later stage.However,the wax/resin coated urea could make up the deficiency of resin coated urea.The process of N release from sulfur coated urea could be well fitted by the parabolic diffusion equation(r=0.9914**-0.9973**).The sulfur coated urea released N stably,but hardly met the requirement of sugarcane growth at the early stage.Compared with the common urea,the controlled-release urea has increased the sugarcane yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency by 5.0-11.4% and 7.5-8.2%,respectively.The different kinds of coated urea should be mixed in proper proportion in relation to the N-releasing characteristics of different controlled-release urea and the needs of sugarcane for fertilizers.It could realize balance between supply and demand for nutrient and improve the utilization efficiency of controlled-release fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An Elovich equation fitted nitrogen release from resin coated urea.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
process of N releasing from resin coated ureae0
Value
r=0.9796**-0.9944**e0

Verbatim

e0

“the Elovich equation could fit the process of N releasing from resin coated urea with good results(r=0.9796**-0.9944**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resin coated urea released more nitrogen early than later.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
N was releasede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
a later stagee0

Verbatim

e0

“It was found more N was released at the early stage,and less at a later stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wax and resin coated urea compensated for the deficiency of resin coated urea.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
wax/resin coated ureae0
Outcome
make up the deficiency of resin coated ureae0

Verbatim

e0

“the wax/resin coated urea could make up the deficiency of resin coated urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A parabolic diffusion equation fitted nitrogen release from sulfur coated urea.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
N release from sulfur coated ureae0
Value
r=0.9914**-0.9973**e0

Verbatim

e0

“The process of N release from sulfur coated urea could be well fitted by the parabolic diffusion equation(r=0.9914**-0.9973**).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur coated urea released nitrogen steadily.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
released N stablye0

Verbatim

e0

“The sulfur coated urea released N stably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur coated urea barely met sugarcane growth requirements early.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
requirement of sugarcane growthe0
Qualifier
at the early stagee0

Verbatim

e0

“hardly met the requirement of sugarcane growth at the early stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled release urea increased sugarcane yield by 5.0-11.4% relative to common urea.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
controlled-release ureae0
Outcome
sugarcane yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.0-11.4%e0
Comparator
common ureae0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the common urea,the controlled-release urea has increased the sugarcane yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency by 5.0-11.4% and 7.5-8.2%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled release urea increased nitrogen use efficiency by 7.5-8.2% relative to common urea.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
controlled-release ureae0
Outcome
nitrogen utilization efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.5-8.2%e0
Comparator
common ureae0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the common urea,the controlled-release urea has increased the sugarcane yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency by 5.0-11.4% and 7.5-8.2%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1095 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend mixing coated ureas in appropriate proportions according to release traits and sugarcane needs.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
coated urea should be mixed in proper proportione0

Verbatim

e0

“The different kinds of coated urea should be mixed in proper proportion in relation to the N-releasing characteristics of different controlled-release urea and the needs of sugarcane for fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1294 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.