Abstract
The tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera Hub. is a polyphagous pest attacking cotton, tomato, okra, chilli, cabbage, pigeon pea, gram etc. throughout the world as well as in India. Due to its high fecundity, polyphagous nature, quick adaptation against insecticides, control of this pest with any single potent toxicant for a long time is quiet difficult and rather impossible. So the newer chemicals need to be evaluated for controlling this pest. Field experiment was under taken for two cropping seasons during September - December, 2006 and September - December, 2007 to find out the efficacy of Spinosad 45% SC against tomato fruit borer (H. armigera Hub.) along with Quinalphos 25% EC, Lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC and Cypermethrin 10 EC at ‘Gayespur’ village (Nadia, West-Bengal, India). It was found that Spinosad was effective against H. armigera on tomato at 73 to 84 gm a.i./ha than Quinalphos, Lambda cyhalothrin and Cypermethrin. Spinosad at 73 to 84 gm a.i./ha were very safe to three important predators recorded in tomato field that is, Menochilus sexmaculaus., Syrphus corollae and Chrysoperla carnea.Spinosad is one of such new chemicals which is derived from fermentation broth of soil actinomycetes, Saccharopolyspora spinosa, containing a naturally occurring mixture of spinosyn A and spinosyn D. It is safe to nymphs and adults of the natural enemies. Key words: Spinosad, Helicoverpa armigera, tomato, natural enemies.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad at 73 to 84 gm a.i./ha was more effective against H. armigera on tomato than three insecticides.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- Spinosade0
- Interactor
- H. armigera
Helicoverpa armigerae0pest - Outcome
- H. armigerae0
- Direction
- effectivee0
- Value
- 73 to 84 gm a.i./hae0
- Comparator
- Quinalphos, Lambda cyhalothrin and Cypermethrine0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Spinosad was effective against H. armigera on tomato at 73 to 84 gm a.i./ha than Quinalphos, Lambda cyhalothrin and Cypermethrin”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad at 73 to 84 gm a.i./ha was very safe to Menochilus sexmaculaus.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- Spinosad at 73 to 84 gm a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- Menochilus sexmaculaus.e0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- very safee0
- Setting
- tomato fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Spinosad at 73 to 84 gm a.i./ha were very safe to three important predators recorded in tomato field that is, Menochilus sexmaculaus., Syrphus corollae and Chrysoperla carnea”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad at 73 to 84 gm a.i./ha was very safe to Syrphus corollae.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- Spinosad at 73 to 84 gm a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- Syrphus corollaee0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- very safee0
- Setting
- tomato fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Spinosad at 73 to 84 gm a.i./ha were very safe to three important predators recorded in tomato field that is, Menochilus sexmaculaus., Syrphus corollae and Chrysoperla carnea”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad at 73 to 84 gm a.i./ha was very safe to Chrysoperla carnea.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- Spinosad at 73 to 84 gm a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- Chrysoperla carnea
Chrysoperla carneae0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- very safee0
- Setting
- tomato fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_Chrysoperla_carnea_-_dorsal_view.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Spinosad at 73 to 84 gm a.i./ha were very safe to three important predators recorded in tomato field that is, Menochilus sexmaculaus., Syrphus corollae and Chrysoperla carnea”
The same questions in other papers
spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.