Paper · 2016 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Morphological, Photosynthetic, and Physiological Responses of Rapeseed Leaf to Different Combinations of Red and Blue Lights at the Rosette Stage

Chang Shengxin; Li Chunxia; Yao Xuyang; et al.

15
claims
26
verbatim quotes
103
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) is sensitive to light quality. The factory production of rapeseed seedlings for vegetable use and for transplanting in the field requires an investigation of the responses of rapeseed to light quality. This study evaluated the responses of the leaf of rapeseed (cv. "Zhongshuang 11") to different ratios of red-photonflux (RPF) and blue-photonflux (BPF) from light emitting diodes (LEDs). The treatments were set as monochromatic lights, including 100R:0B% and 0R:100B%, and compound lights (CLs), including 75R:25B%, 50R:50B%, and 25R:75B%. The total photonflux in all of the treatments was set as 550 μmolm(-2)s(-1). With an increase of BPF, the rapeseed leaves changed from wrinkled blades and down-rolled margins to flat blades and slightly up-rolled margins, and the compact degree of palisade tissue increased. One layer of the cells of palisade tissue was present under 100R:0B%, whereas two layers were present under the other treatments. Compared to 100R:0B%, 0R:100B% enhanced the indexes of leaf thickness, leaf mass per area (LMA), stomatal density, chlorophyll (Chl) content per weight and photosynthetic capacity (P max), and the CLs with high BPF ratios enhanced these indexes. However, the 100R:0B% and CLs with high RPF ratios enhanced the net photosynthetic rate (P n). The leaves under the CLs showed growth vigor, whereas the leaves under 100R:0B% or 0R:100B% were stressed with a low F v/F m (photosynthetic maximum quantum yield) and a high content of [Formula: see text] and H2O2. The top second leaves under 100R:0B% or 0R:100B% showed stress resistance responses with a high activity of antioxidase, but the top third leaves showed irreversible damage and inactivity of antioxidase. Our results showed that the rapeseed leaves grown under 0R:100B% or CLs with a high BPF ratio showed higher ability to utilize high photonflux, while the leaves grown under 100R:0B% or CLs with a low BPF ratio showed higher efficiency in utilizing low photonflux. Under different R:B photonflux ratios, red and blue lights may play mutual roles in P n. When the blue light dominated, the P n showed a B-preference. When the red light dominated, the P n showed an R-preference. Furthermore, CLs were suitable for the P n of rapeseed seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing blue photon flux changed leaf blades and margins from wrinkled and down-rolled to flat and slightly up-rolled.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
increase of BPFe0
Outcome
flat blades and slightly up-rolled marginse0
Comparator
wrinkled blades and down-rolled marginse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“With an increase of BPF, the rapeseed leaves changed from wrinkled blades and down-rolled margins to flat blades and slightly up-rolled margins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing blue photon flux increased palisade tissue compactness.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
increase of BPFe0
Outcome
compact degree of palisade tissuee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With an increase of BPF, the rapeseed leaves changed from wrinkled blades and down-rolled margins to flat blades and slightly up-rolled margins, and the compact degree of palisade tissue increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palisade tissue had one cell layer under 100R:0B% and two under the other treatments.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
100R:0B%e0
Outcome
layer of the cells of palisade tissuee0
Value
One layere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“One layer of the cells of palisade tissue was present under 100R:0B%, whereas two layers were present under the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light and high blue compound lights enhanced leaf thickness, LMA and stomatal density.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
0R:100B%e0
Outcome
leaf thickness, leaf mass per area (LMA), stomatal densitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
100R:0B%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to 100R:0B%, 0R:100B% enhanced the indexes of leaf thickness, leaf mass per area (LMA), stomatal density, chlorophyll (Chl) content per weight and photosynthetic capacity (P max), and the CLs with high BPF ratios enhanced these indexes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light and high blue compound lights enhanced chlorophyll content and photosynthetic capacity.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
0R:100B%e0
Outcome
chlorophyll (Chl) content per weight and photosynthetic capacity (P max)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
100R:0B%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to 100R:0B%, 0R:100B% enhanced the indexes of leaf thickness, leaf mass per area (LMA), stomatal density, chlorophyll (Chl) content per weight and photosynthetic capacity (P max), and the CLs with high BPF ratios enhanced these indexes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light and high red compound lights enhanced net photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
100R:0B% and CLs with high RPF ratiose0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (P n)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the 100R:0B% and CLs with high RPF ratios enhanced the net photosynthetic rate (P n)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves under compound lights showed growth vigor.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
CLse0
Outcome
growth vigore0

Verbatim

e0

“The leaves under the CLs showed growth vigor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monochromatic red or blue leaves showed low F v/F m and high stress compounds.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
100R:0B% or 0R:100B%e0
Outcome
low F v/F m (photosynthetic maximum quantum yield)e0
Direction
lowe0

Verbatim

e0

“the leaves under 100R:0B% or 0R:100B% were stressed with a low F v/F m (photosynthetic maximum quantum yield) and a high content of [Formula: see text] and H2O2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1531 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monochromatic red or blue top second leaves had high antioxidase activity.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Organ / stage
top second leavese0
Treatment
100R:0B% or 0R:100B%e0
Outcome
activity of antioxidasee0
Direction
highe0

Verbatim

e0

“The top second leaves under 100R:0B% or 0R:100B% showed stress resistance responses with a high activity of antioxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monochromatic red or blue top third leaves showed irreversible damage and antioxidase inactivity.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Organ / stage
top third leavese0
Outcome
irreversible damage and inactivity of antioxidasee0

Verbatim

e0

“the top third leaves showed irreversible damage and inactivity of antioxidase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light or high blue compound lights gave greater ability to use high photon flux.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
0R:100B% or CLs with a high BPF ratioe0
Outcome
ability to utilize high photonfluxe0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“the rapeseed leaves grown under 0R:100B% or CLs with a high BPF ratio showed higher ability to utilize high photonflux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1761–1879 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red light or low blue compound lights gave greater efficiency at low photon flux.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
100R:0B% or CLs with a low BPF ratioe0
Outcome
efficiency in utilizing low photonfluxe0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“the leaves grown under 100R:0B% or CLs with a low BPF ratio showed higher efficiency in utilizing low photonflux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthetic rate preferred blue light when blue dominated.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
blue lighte0
Outcome
B-preferencee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“When the blue light dominated, the P n showed a B-preference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2090–2150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthetic rate preferred red light when red dominated.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
red lighte0
Outcome
R-preferencee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“When the red light dominated, the P n showed an R-preference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2152–2212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Compound lights were considered suitable for seedling net photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Outcome
CLs were suitable for the P ne0

Verbatim

e0

“CLs were suitable for the P n of rapeseed seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2227–2278 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.