Paper · 2015

SOIL & CROP SCIENCES | RESEARCH ARTICLE Sustainable management of root-knot disease of tomato by neem cake and Glomus fasciculatum

Rose Rizvi; Geeta Singh; Rizwan Ali Ansari; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1 Abstract: A pot experiment was conducted during winter season of 2009-2010 in the department of Botany, AMU, Aligarh, India, to determine the nematicidal potential of organic matter, neem cake at third level of dose, and bioagent, Glomus fasciculatum in terms of various growth parameters of tomato, when inoculated individually as well as concomitantly with respect to root-knot development. Neem cake and G. fasciculatum showed potential for sustainable management while providing nutrient sources for proper plant growth. Disease intensity of root-knot nematode decreased while increasing the doses of neem cake along with the G. fasciculatum. Chlorophyll contents have been found to be increased in single and combined application as well. There is a progressive increase in growth parameters raised in soil amended with 10, 20, and 30 g neem cake/kg soil and inoculated with G. fasciculatum. Significant improvement in the plant growth was observed when G. fasciculatum and neem cake were inoculated simultaneously. Neem cake plus G. fasciculatum reduced the nematodes' multiplication and root-galling, and increased the plant growth of tomato as compared to unamended and Meloidogyne incognita-inoculated plants. Mycorrhyzation and agronomic parameters were increased due to application of G. fasciculatum alone, but enhanced further when inoculated with neem cake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher neem cake doses with G. fasciculatum decreased root-knot disease intensity.

Treatment
neem cake along with the G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee0pathogen
Second interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
Disease intensity of root-knot nematodee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease intensity of root-knot nematode decreased while increasing the doses of neem cake along with the G. fasciculatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and combined applications increased chlorophyll content.

Treatment
single and combined applicatione0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll contents have been found to be increased in single and combined application as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing neem cake rates with G. fasciculatum progressively increased tomato growth parameters.

Treatment
10, 20, and 30 g neem cake/kg soil and inoculated with G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
progressive increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is a progressive increase in growth parameters raised in soil amended with 10, 20, and 30 g neem cake/kg soil and inoculated with G. fasciculatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous G. fasciculatum and neem cake application significantly improved plant growth.

Treatment
G. fasciculatum and neem cakee0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant improvement in the plant growth was observed when G. fasciculatum and neem cake were inoculated simultaneously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake with G. fasciculatum reduced nematode multiplication relative to unamended and nematode inoculated plants.

Treatment
Neem cake plus G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
nematodes' multiplicatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
unamended and Meloidogyne incognita-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem cake plus G. fasciculatum reduced the nematodes' multiplication and root-galling, and increased the plant growth of tomato as compared to unamended and Meloidogyne incognita-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake with G. fasciculatum reduced root galling relative to controls.

Treatment
Neem cake plus G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
root-gallinge0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
unamended and Meloidogyne incognita-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem cake plus G. fasciculatum reduced the nematodes' multiplication and root-galling, and increased the plant growth of tomato as compared to unamended and Meloidogyne incognita-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake with G. fasciculatum increased tomato growth relative to controls.

Treatment
Neem cake plus G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unamended and Meloidogyne incognita-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem cake plus G. fasciculatum reduced the nematodes' multiplication and root-galling, and increased the plant growth of tomato as compared to unamended and Meloidogyne incognita-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. fasciculatum alone increased mycorrhization, further enhanced by neem cake.

Treatment
G. fasciculatum alonee0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
Mycorrhyzatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
neem cakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhyzation and agronomic parameters were increased due to application of G. fasciculatum alone, but enhanced further when inoculated with neem cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 115 positive, 2 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.