Paper · 2016 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Geminivirus-Mediated Genome Editing in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Using Sequence-Specific Nucleases

Nathaniel M. Butler; Nicholas J. Baltes; Daniel F. Voytas; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
338
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Genome editing using sequence-specific nucleases (SSNs) is rapidly being developed for genetic engineering in crop species. The utilization of zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated systems (CRISPR/Cas) for inducing double-strand breaks facilitates targeting of virtually any sequence for modification. Targeted mutagenesis via non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) has been demonstrated extensively as being the preferred DNA repair pathway in plants. However, gene targeting via homologous recombination (HR) remains more elusive but could be a powerful tool for directed DNA repair. To overcome barriers associated with gene targeting, a geminivirus replicon (GVR) was used to deliver SSNs targeting the potato ACETOLACTATE SYNTHASE1 (ALS1) gene and repair templates designed to incorporate herbicide-inhibiting point mutations within the ALS1 locus. Transformed events modified with GVRs held point mutations that were capable of supporting a reduced herbicide susceptibility phenotype, while events transformed with conventional T-DNAs held no detectable mutations and were similar to wild-type. Regeneration of transformed events improved detection of point mutations that supported a stronger reduced herbicide susceptibility phenotype. These results demonstrate the use of geminiviruses for delivering genome editing reagents in plant species, and a novel approach to gene targeting in a vegetatively propagated species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato events transformed with geminivirus replicons (GVRs) held point mutations capable of supporting reduced herbicide susceptibility, compared with conventional T-DNA transformation.

Treatment
a geminivirus replicon (GVR)e2
Gene
ACETOLACTATE SYNTHASE1 (ALS1)e2
Outcome
herbicide susceptibilitye1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
events transformed with conventional T-DNAse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Transformed events modified with GVRs held point mutations that were capable of supporting a reduced herbicide susceptibility phenotype, while events transformed with conventional T-DNAs held no detectable mutations and were similar to wild-type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1224 · show in text ↑
e2

“a geminivirus replicon (GVR) was used to deliver SSNs targeting the potato ACETOLACTATE SYNTHASE1 (ALS1) gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–873 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato events transformed with conventional T-DNAs held no detectable mutations and were similar to wild-type.

Treatment
conventional T-DNAse3
Outcome
detectable mutationse3
Qualifier
similar to wild-typee3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a geminivirus replicon (GVR) was used to deliver SSNs targeting the potato ACETOLACTATE SYNTHASE1 (ALS1) gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–873 · show in text ↑
e3

“events transformed with conventional T-DNAs held no detectable mutations and were similar to wild-type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regeneration of transformed potato events improved detection of point mutations.

Treatment
Regeneration of transformed eventse4
Outcome
detection of point mutationse4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a geminivirus replicon (GVR) was used to deliver SSNs targeting the potato ACETOLACTATE SYNTHASE1 (ALS1) gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–873 · show in text ↑
e4

“Regeneration of transformed events improved detection of point mutations that supported a stronger reduced herbicide susceptibility phenotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regeneration of transformed potato events supported a stronger reduced herbicide susceptibility phenotype.

Treatment
Regeneration of transformed eventse4
Outcome
herbicide susceptibility phenotypee4
Direction
stronger reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“a geminivirus replicon (GVR) was used to deliver SSNs targeting the potato ACETOLACTATE SYNTHASE1 (ALS1) gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–873 · show in text ↑
e4

“Regeneration of transformed events improved detection of point mutations that supported a stronger reduced herbicide susceptibility phenotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1367 · show in text ↑

transgenic · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.