Paper · 2016 · Crop Science

Within‐Season Growth and Spectral Reflectance of Cotton and their Relation to Lint Yield

Ahmed Attia; Nithya Rajan

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Within‐season measurements of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth and development in response to moisture deficit stress can provide insight into how management practices impact plant health and yield. The objectives were to investigate responses of leaf area index (LAI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), normalized difference water index (NDWI), and crop water stress index (CWSI) and their relation to the lint yield of four cotton cultivars (PHY499, DP1044, PHY375, and FM9170) grown under various irrigation levels for two consecutive growing seasons at Chillicothe, TX. Plants exposed to water stress showed significant LAI, NDVI, and NDWI decrease and CWSI increase compared with well‐watered plants. The NDVI reached a plateau value of 0.89 at 82 d after planting (DAP), while NDWI increased steadily to the end of the growing seasons for the high irrigation level. The high irrigation level had the greatest lint yield of 1670 and 1846 kg ha −1 in 2013 and 2014, respectively. Fiber length, strength, and micronaire showed significant differences among irrigation levels. Compared with dryland, an average 8% increase in fiber length and strength and 10% decrease in micronaire were observed by the high irrigation level. High positive correlations of LAI, NDVI, and NDWI with lint yield were observed in both years. The CWSI differentiated low vs. high irrigated plants and was negatively correlated with lint yield. The results indicated that these measurements at different growth stages are useful to detect growth and water status for cotton in the semiarid Texas Rolling Plains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly decreased cotton leaf area index relative to well-watered plants.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
well‐watered plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants exposed to water stress showed significant LAI, NDVI, and NDWI decrease and CWSI increase compared with well‐watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–723 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly decreased cotton NDVI and NDWI relative to well-watered plants.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
NDVI, and NDWIe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
well‐watered plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants exposed to water stress showed significant LAI, NDVI, and NDWI decrease and CWSI increase compared with well‐watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–723 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress significantly increased cotton CWSI relative to well-watered plants.

Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
CWSIe0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
well‐watered plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants exposed to water stress showed significant LAI, NDVI, and NDWI decrease and CWSI increase compared with well‐watered plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–723 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton NDVI plateaued at 0.89 at 82 days after planting.

Outcome
NDVIe0
Direction
plateaue0
Value
0.89e0
Qualifier
82 d after planting (DAP)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NDVI reached a plateau value of 0.89 at 82 d after planting (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–794 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under high irrigation, cotton NDWI rose steadily to the end of the growing seasons.

Treatment
high irrigation levele0
Outcome
NDWIe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NDWI increased steadily to the end of the growing seasons for the high irrigation level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irrigation produced the greatest lint yield, 1670 kg ha −1 in 2013.

Treatment
high irrigation levele0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
greateste0
Value
1670e0
Qualifier
2013e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high irrigation level had the greatest lint yield of 1670 and 1846 kg ha −1 in 2013 and 2014, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irrigation produced the greatest lint yield, 1846 kg ha −1 in 2014.

Treatment
high irrigation levele0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
greateste0
Value
1846 kg ha −1e0
Qualifier
2014e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high irrigation level had the greatest lint yield of 1670 and 1846 kg ha −1 in 2013 and 2014, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber length, strength and micronaire differed significantly among irrigation levels.

Treatment
irrigation levelse0
Outcome
Fiber length, strength, and micronairee0
Direction
differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fiber length, strength, and micronaire showed significant differences among irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irrigation increased fiber length and strength by an average 8% compared with dryland.

Treatment
high irrigation levele0
Outcome
fiber length and strengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8%e0
Comparator
drylande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with dryland, an average 8% increase in fiber length and strength and 10% decrease in micronaire were observed by the high irrigation level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1246 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irrigation decreased micronaire by 10% compared with dryland.

Treatment
high irrigation levele0
Outcome
micronairee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
drylande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with dryland, an average 8% increase in fiber length and strength and 10% decrease in micronaire were observed by the high irrigation level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1246 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LAI, NDVI and NDWI were highly positively correlated with lint yield in both years.

Treatment
LAI, NDVI, and NDWIe0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High positive correlations of LAI, NDVI, and NDWI with lint yield were observed in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1341 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CWSI distinguished low from high irrigation and correlated negatively with lint yield.

Treatment
CWSIe0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CWSI differentiated low vs. high irrigated plants and was negatively correlated with lint yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1442 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–61 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-stage measurements were useful for detecting cotton growth and water status in the semiarid Texas Rolling Plains.

Outcome
detect growth and water statuse0
Qualifier
at different growth stagese0
Setting
semiarid Texas Rolling Plainse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these measurements at different growth stages are useful to detect growth and water status for cotton in the semiarid Texas Rolling Plains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1609 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 25 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.