Paper · 1994 · HortScience

ESTABLISHMENT OF THYME (THYMUS VULGARIS L.) BY DIRECT SOWING OR TRANSPLANTING AT TWO DENSITIES

Lucette LaFlamme; Marie-Hélène Michaud; Nicholas Tremblay

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cultivation of thyme for medicinal purposes should result in high dry-matter yield and sufficient active principals concentrations. In this experiment two methods of crop establishment were compared: direct sowing (final plant density: 100,000 plants/ha) and planting at two densities: D-1 (100,000 plants/ha) and D-2 (166,000 plants/ha). The use of transplants promoted growth and resulted in yields three times higher than direct sowing (3340 vs. 1002 kg dry matter/ha). There were significant differences in biomass between the two densities evaluated. Plants under D-1 weighed 33 g dry matter/plant vs. 22 g dry matter/plant for D-2. Hence, dry-matter yield per hectare was not affected by planting density. Active principals concentrations were not affected by treatments. So far, it is recommended that cultivation of thyme under Quebec's conditions be based on transplanting at moderate (100,000 plants/ha) density.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting promoted thyme growth compared with direct sowing.

Treatment
transplantse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
direct sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of transplants promoted growth and resulted in yields three times higher than direct sowing (3340 vs. 1002 kg dry matter/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“THYME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting produced thyme dry matter yields three times those of direct sowing, 3340 versus 1002 kg per hectare.

Treatment
transplantse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
3340 vs. 1002 kg dry matter/hae0
Comparator
direct sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of transplants promoted growth and resulted in yields three times higher than direct sowing (3340 vs. 1002 kg dry matter/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“THYME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

D-1 plants had higher dry matter per plant than D-2 plants, 33 versus 22 g.

Treatment
D-1e0
Outcome
dry matter/plante0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
33 g dry matter/plante0
Comparator
D-2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants under D-1 weighed 33 g dry matter/plant vs. 22 g dry matter/plant for D-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“THYME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density did not affect dry matter yield per hectare.

Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
dry-matter yield per hectaree0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry-matter yield per hectare was not affected by planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“THYME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Establishment treatments did not affect active principal concentrations.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Active principals concentrationse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Active principals concentrations were not affected by treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“THYME”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend transplanting thyme at 100,000 plants per hectare in Quebec.

Outcome
transplanting at moderate (100,000 plants/ha) densitye0
Setting
Quebec's conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is recommended that cultivation of thyme under Quebec's conditions be based on transplanting at moderate (100,000 plants/ha) density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–921 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Thymus vulgaris (thyme)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.