Paper · 2013 · Photosynthetica

Root-zone CO2 and root-zone temperature effects on photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism of aeroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in the tropics

J. He; L. Qin; S. K. Lee

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
39
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effects of elevated root-zone (RZ) CO2 concentration (RZ [CO2]) and RZ temperature (RZT) on photosynthesis, productivity, nitrate (NO3 -), total reduced nitrogen (TRN), total leaf soluble and Rubisco proteins were studied in aeroponically grown lettuce plants in a tropical greenhouse. Three weeks after transplanting, four different RZ [CO2] concentrations (ambient, 360 ppm, and elevated concentrations of 2,000; 10,000; and 50,000 ppm) were imposed on plants at 20°C-RZT or ambient(A)-RZT (24-38°C). Elevated RZ [CO2] resulted in significantly higher light-saturated net photosynthetic rate, but lower light-saturated stomatal conductance. Higher elevated RZ [CO2] also protected plants from both chronic and dynamic photoinhibition (measured by chlorophyll fluorescence Fv/Fm ratio) and reduced leaf water loss. Under each RZ [CO2], all these variables were significantly higher in 20°C-RZT plants than in A-RZT plants. All plants accumulated more biomass at elevated RZ [CO2] than at ambient RZ [CO2]. Greater increases of biomass in roots than in shoots were manifested by lower shoot/root ratios at elevated RZ [CO2]. Although the total biomass was higher at 20°C-RZT, the increase in biomass under elevated RZ [CO2] was greater at A-RZT. Shoot NO3 - and TRN concentrations, total leaf soluble and Rubisco protein concentrations were higher in all elevated RZ [CO2] plants than in plants under ambient RZ [CO2] at both RZTs. Under each RZ [CO2], total leaf soluble and Rubisco protein concentrations were significantly higher at 20°C-RZT than at A-RZT. Our results demonstrated that increased P Nmax and productivity under elevated [CO2] was partially due to the alleviation of midday water loss, both dynamic and chronic photoinhibition as well as higher turnover of Calvin cycle with higher Rubisco proteins.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated root-zone CO2 increased light-saturated photosynthesis significantly.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Elevated RZ [CO2]e0
Outcome
light-saturated net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated RZ [CO2] resulted in significantly higher light-saturated net photosynthetic rate, but lower light-saturated stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated root-zone CO2 lowered light-saturated stomatal conductance.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Elevated RZ [CO2]e0
Outcome
light-saturated stomatal conductancee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated RZ [CO2] resulted in significantly higher light-saturated net photosynthetic rate, but lower light-saturated stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher root-zone CO2 protected lettuce from chronic and dynamic photoinhibition.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Higher elevated RZ [CO2]e0
Outcome
chronic and dynamic photoinhibitione0
Direction
protectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher elevated RZ [CO2] also protected plants from both chronic and dynamic photoinhibition (measured by chlorophyll fluorescence Fv/Fm ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher root-zone CO2 reduced leaf water loss.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Higher elevated RZ [CO2]e0
Outcome
leaf water losse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher elevated RZ [CO2] also protected plants from both chronic and dynamic photoinhibition (measured by chlorophyll fluorescence Fv/Fm ratio) and reduced leaf water loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Across CO2 levels, the preceding physiological variables were higher at 20°C than ambient root-zone temperature.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
20°C-RZTe0
Outcome
all these variablese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
A-RZTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under each RZ [CO2], all these variables were significantly higher in 20°C-RZT plants than in A-RZT plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All plants accumulated more biomass at elevated than ambient root-zone CO2.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
elevated RZ [CO2]e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
ambient RZ [CO2]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All plants accumulated more biomass at elevated RZ [CO2] than at ambient RZ [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated root-zone CO2 lowered shoot/root ratios through larger root than shoot biomass gains.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
elevated RZ [CO2]e0
Outcome
shoot/root ratiose0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater increases of biomass in roots than in shoots were manifested by lower shoot/root ratios at elevated RZ [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total biomass was higher at 20°C root-zone temperature.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
20°C-RZTe0
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total biomass was higher at 20°C-RZT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biomass response to elevated CO2 was greater at ambient than 20°C root-zone temperature.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
elevated RZ [CO2]e0
Outcome
increase in biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Setting
A-RZTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase in biomass under elevated RZ [CO2] was greater at A-RZT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased shoot nitrate and total reduced nitrogen concentrations at both temperatures.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
elevated RZ [CO2]e0
Outcome
Shoot NO3 - and TRN concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ambient RZ [CO2]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot NO3 - and TRN concentrations, total leaf soluble and Rubisco protein concentrations were higher in all elevated RZ [CO2] plants than in plants under ambient RZ [CO2] at both RZTs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased soluble and Rubisco protein concentrations.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
elevated RZ [CO2]e0
Outcome
total leaf soluble and Rubisco protein concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ambient RZ [CO2]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot NO3 - and TRN concentrations, total leaf soluble and Rubisco protein concentrations were higher in all elevated RZ [CO2] plants than in plants under ambient RZ [CO2] at both RZTs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At each CO2 level, soluble and Rubisco protein concentrations were higher at 20°C than ambient temperature.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
20°C-RZTe0
Outcome
total leaf soluble and Rubisco protein concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
A-RZTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under each RZ [CO2], total leaf soluble and Rubisco protein concentrations were significantly higher at 20°C-RZT than at A-RZT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed greater photosynthesis and productivity under elevated CO2 partly to less water loss and photoinhibition and higher Calvin cycle turnover.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
increased P Nmax and productivitye0
Qualifier
alleviation of midday water loss, both dynamic and chronic photoinhibition as well as higher turnover of Calvin cycle with higher Rubisco proteinse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased P Nmax and productivity under elevated [CO2] was partially due to the alleviation of midday water loss, both dynamic and chronic photoinhibition as well as higher turnover of Calvin cycle with higher Rubisco proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1816 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–120 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

co2 · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 33 positive, 9 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

co2 · physiology: water · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.