Paper · 2016 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Technological quality and yield of sugarcane grown under nitrogen doses via subsurface drip fertigation

Andressa F. L. Rhein; Renata P. Pincelli; Marcel T. Arantes; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
39
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study characterized the technological quality and yield of sugarcane cv. SP80-3280 under nitrogen doses via subsurface drip fertigation. Five treatments were established using N-fertilizer in the form of urea (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg N ha-1), with four replicates, applied via subsurface drip fertigation. The technological quality (fiber% cane; Brix% juice; pol% juice, pol% cane; juice purity and total recoverable sugar - TRS), as well as yield of stalks and sugar were determined 381 days after the third harvest. The technological variables Brix%, pol% juice, purity% and TRS of sugarcane, cultivar SP80-3280, were altered by the application of nitrogen doses via subsurface drip fertigation, with significant reductions at the dose of 200 kg N ha-1. Stalk and sugar yields increased linearly with the increment in nitrogen doses applied through subsurface drip fertigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 200 kg N ha-1, nitrogen fertigation significantly reduced Brix%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
SP80-3280e0
Treatment
200 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Brix%e0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Brix%, pol% juice, purity% and TRS of sugarcane, cultivar SP80-3280, were altered by the application of nitrogen doses via subsurface drip fertigation, with significant reductions at the dose of 200 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 200 kg N ha-1, nitrogen fertigation significantly reduced juice pol%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
SP80-3280e0
Treatment
200 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
pol% juicee0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Brix%, pol% juice, purity% and TRS of sugarcane, cultivar SP80-3280, were altered by the application of nitrogen doses via subsurface drip fertigation, with significant reductions at the dose of 200 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 200 kg N ha-1, nitrogen fertigation significantly reduced purity%.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
SP80-3280e0
Treatment
200 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
purity%e0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Brix%, pol% juice, purity% and TRS of sugarcane, cultivar SP80-3280, were altered by the application of nitrogen doses via subsurface drip fertigation, with significant reductions at the dose of 200 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 200 kg N ha-1, nitrogen fertigation significantly reduced TRS.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
SP80-3280e0
Treatment
200 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
TRSe0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Brix%, pol% juice, purity% and TRS of sugarcane, cultivar SP80-3280, were altered by the application of nitrogen doses via subsurface drip fertigation, with significant reductions at the dose of 200 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–771 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stalk yield increased linearly with nitrogen dose.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
SP80-3280e1
Treatment
nitrogen doses applied through subsurface drip fertigatione0
Outcome
Stalke0
Direction
increased linearlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stalk and sugar yields increased linearly with the increment in nitrogen doses applied through subsurface drip fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–895 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane cv. SP80-3280”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar yield increased linearly with nitrogen dose.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
SP80-3280e1
Treatment
nitrogen doses applied through subsurface drip fertigatione0
Outcome
sugar yieldse0
Direction
increased linearlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Stalk and sugar yields increased linearly with the increment in nitrogen doses applied through subsurface drip fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–895 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugarcane cv. SP80-3280”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–96 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 129 positive, 13 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.