Paper · 2004 · PubMed

[Effect of bagging on greenhouse cucumber].

Zhijie Chen; Shulian Zhang; Yinli Liang; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The study showed that culturing cucumber with film bag increased cucumber yield by 12.3% - 15.1%, reduced abnormal cucumber by 65.3% - 72.8%, and the shape of cucumber was straight and smooth. The keeping-fresh period of the cucumber prolonged to 20 - 25 days, its vitamin C increased 21.9%, and total sugar increased to 5.1%. Paper bagging increased cucumber yield by 7.2% - 10.1%, and reduced abnormal cucumber by 52.2% - 57.7%. Bag body could efficiently prevent the cucumber from the direct pollution of chemicals spray. The survival pesticides in film and paper bags was 0.760 mg x kg(-1) and 1.2208 mg x kg(-1), reduced by 83.3% and 73.2%, respectively, compared to non-bagging.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film bagging increased cucumber yield by 12.3% - 15.1%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
film bage0
Outcome
cucumber yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.3% - 15.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greenhouse cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“culturing cucumber with film bag increased cucumber yield by 12.3% - 15.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film bagging reduced abnormal cucumber by 65.3% - 72.8%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
film bage1
Outcome
abnormal cucumbere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
65.3% - 72.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced abnormal cucumber by 65.3% - 72.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“culturing cucumber with film bag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film-bagged cucumber fruit were straight and smooth.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
film bage1
Outcome
shape of cucumber was straight and smoothe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shape of cucumber was straight and smooth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“culturing cucumber with film bag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film bagging prolonged cucumber keeping-fresh period to 20 - 25 days.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
film bage1
Outcome
keeping-fresh periode0
Direction
prolongede0
Value
20 - 25 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The keeping-fresh period of the cucumber prolonged to 20 - 25 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–259 · show in text ↑
e1

“culturing cucumber with film bag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film bagging increased cucumber vitamin C by 21.9%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
film bage1
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its vitamin C increased 21.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–290 · show in text ↑
e1

“culturing cucumber with film bag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film bagging increased cucumber total sugar to 5.1%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
film bage1
Outcome
total sugare0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total sugar increased to 5.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–325 · show in text ↑
e1

“culturing cucumber with film bag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paper bagging increased cucumber yield by 7.2% - 10.1%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Paper bagginge0
Outcome
cucumber yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.2% - 10.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paper bagging increased cucumber yield by 7.2% - 10.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paper bagging reduced abnormal cucumber by 52.2% - 57.7%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Paper bagginge0
Outcome
abnormal cucumbere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
52.2% - 57.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paper bagging increased cucumber yield by 7.2% - 10.1%, and reduced abnormal cucumber by 52.2% - 57.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging prevented direct pollution of cucumber by chemical sprays.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Bag bodye0
Outcome
direct pollution of chemicals spraye0
Direction
prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bag body could efficiently prevent the cucumber from the direct pollution of chemicals spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film bags contained 0.760 mg x kg(-1) surviving pesticide, an 83.3% reduction relative to no bagging.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
film bage1
Outcome
survival pesticidese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.760 mg x kg(-1)e0
Qualifier
83.3%e0
Comparator
non-bagginge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival pesticides in film and paper bags was 0.760 mg x kg(-1) and 1.2208 mg x kg(-1), reduced by 83.3% and 73.2%, respectively, compared to non-bagging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–684 · show in text ↑
e1

“culturing cucumber with film bag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paper bags contained 1.2208 mg x kg(-1) surviving pesticide, a 73.2% reduction relative to no bagging.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Paper bagginge1
Outcome
survival pesticidese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.2208 mg x kg(-1)e0
Qualifier
73.2%e0
Comparator
non-bagginge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival pesticides in film and paper bags was 0.760 mg x kg(-1) and 1.2208 mg x kg(-1), reduced by 83.3% and 73.2%, respectively, compared to non-bagging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–684 · show in text ↑
e1

“Paper bagging increased cucumber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–365 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · organism · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.