Abstract
Inoculation of 'Thompson Seedless' grapevines with 500 Xiphinerna index or 1,000 Pratylenchus vulnus alone or in combination suppressed vine shoot and root growth under greenhouse conditions. Pratytenchus vulnus caused greater stunting of roots than X. index. Each nematode species inhibited top growth about equally. Concomitant inoculations caused greater stunting of tops and roots than did inoculations of either nematode species alone. Differences in growth between inoculated and control plants increased with exposure time. Pratylenchus vulnus competed with and gradually superseded in numbers an established population of X. index. Both species reproduced on 'Thompson Seedless' roots, but P. vulnus increased to a much higher level than did X. index. The increase of P. vulnus, together with extensive damage, proves its pathogenicity to grapevines.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Xiphinerna index inoculation suppressed grapevine shoot and root growth.
- Material
- Thompson Seedlesse0
- Treatment
- 500 Xiphinerna indexe0
- Outcome
- vine shoot and root growthe0
- Direction
- suppressede0
VitisNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of 'Thompson Seedless' grapevines with 500 Xiphinerna index or 1,000 Pratylenchus vulnus alone or in combination suppressed vine shoot and root growth under greenhouse conditions.”
t0“Pratylenchus vulnus and Xiphinema index singly and combined on vine growth of Vitis vinifera.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pratylenchus vulnus inoculation suppressed grapevine shoot and root growth.
- Material
- Thompson Seedlesse0
- Treatment
- 1,000 Pratylenchus vulnuse0
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse0pathogent0
- Outcome
- vine shoot and root growthe0
- Direction
- suppressede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of 'Thompson Seedless' grapevines with 500 Xiphinerna index or 1,000 Pratylenchus vulnus alone or in combination suppressed vine shoot and root growth under greenhouse conditions.”
t0“Pratylenchus vulnus and Xiphinema index singly and combined on vine growth of Vitis vinifera.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pratytenchus vulnus stunted roots more than X. index.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera
Vitis viniferat0 - Treatment
- Pratytenchus vulnuse0
- Second interactor
- X. indexXiphinema indexe0pathogent0
- Outcome
- stunting of rootse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- X. indexe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pratytenchus vulnus caused greater stunting of roots than X. index.”
t0“Pratylenchus vulnus and Xiphinema index singly and combined on vine growth of Vitis vinifera.”
Claim · model-written summary
The two nematode species inhibited grapevine top growth about equally.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnust0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Xiphinema indexXiphinema indext0pathogen
- Outcome
- top growthe0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Each nematode species inhibited top growth about equally.”
t0“Pratylenchus vulnus and Xiphinema index singly and combined on vine growth of Vitis vinifera.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined inoculation caused greater top and root stunting than either single-species inoculation.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- Concomitant inoculationse0
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnust0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Xiphinema indexXiphinema indext0pathogen
- Outcome
- stunting of tops and rootse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- inoculations of either nematode species alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Concomitant inoculations caused greater stunting of tops and roots than did inoculations of either nematode species alone.”
t0“Pratylenchus vulnus and Xiphinema index singly and combined on vine growth of Vitis vinifera.”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth differences between inoculated and control plants increased with exposure time.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- inoculatede0
- Outcome
- Differences in growthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Differences in growth between inoculated and control plants increased with exposure time.”
t0“Pratylenchus vulnus and Xiphinema index singly and combined on vine growth of Vitis vinifera.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pratylenchus vulnus competed with and gradually outnumbered established X. index.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse0pathogent0
- Second interactor
- X. indexXiphinema indexe0pathogent0
- Outcome
- Pratylenchus vulnus competed with and gradually superseded in numbers an established population of X. indexe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pratylenchus vulnus competed with and gradually superseded in numbers an established population of X. index.”
t0“Pratylenchus vulnus and Xiphinema index singly and combined on vine growth of Vitis vinifera.”
Claim · model-written summary
Both nematode species reproduced on Thompson Seedless roots.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Material
- Thompson Seedlesse0
- Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Interactor
- Pratylenchus vulnusPratylenchus vulnust0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Xiphinema indexXiphinema indext0pathogen
- Outcome
- reproducede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both species reproduced on 'Thompson Seedless' roots”
t0“Pratylenchus vulnus and Xiphinema index singly and combined on vine growth of Vitis vinifera.”
Claim · model-written summary
P. vulnus reached a much higher level than X. index on grapevine roots.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Interactor
- P. vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse0pathogent0
- Second interactor
- X. indexXiphinema indexe0pathogent0
- Outcome
- P. vulnus increasede0
- Direction
- much highere0
- Comparator
- X. indexe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P. vulnus increased to a much higher level than did X. index.”
t0“Pratylenchus vulnus and Xiphinema index singly and combined on vine growth of Vitis vinifera.”
Claim · model-written summary
The increase of P. vulnus with extensive damage supports its pathogenicity to grapevines.
- Interactor
- P. vulnusPratylenchus vulnuse0pathogent0
- Outcome
- pathogenicity to grapevinese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increase of P. vulnus, together with extensive damage, proves its pathogenicity to grapevines.”
t0“Pratylenchus vulnus and Xiphinema index singly and combined on vine growth of Vitis vinifera.”
The same questions in other papers
Pratylenchus vulnus · growth · VitisResults differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- no effect
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.