Abstract
In four tests conducted in loamy-sand soils in northern Florida, cotton lint yield increased and post-harvest soil populations of Meloidogyne incognita were more effectively suppressed by 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) than aldicarb when both nematicides were evaluated over a range of recommended rates. Significant positive relationships existed between lint yield and rates of 1,3-D in three tests, whereas only one significant positive relationship occurred between lint yield and aldicarb rates. Yield increases ranged from 16% to 124%, depending on rate of 1,3-D, and 35% in one aldicarb-treated test. Only a weak negative relationship between post-harvest soil densities of second-stage juveniles (J2) and aldicarb rates was determined by combining data from the four tests. Aldicarb failed to suppress post-harvest J2 soil population densities in any test. All rates of 1,3-D significantly reduced post-harvest M. incognita J2 soil population densities in two tests and provided a stronger negative correlation between nematode soil densities and rates than aldicarb when all test data were combined for each nematicide.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton lint yield increased more with 1,3-D than aldicarb.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D)e0
- Outcome
- cotton lint yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- aldicarbe0
Not reportedSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cotton lint yield increased and post-harvest soil populations of Meloidogyne incognita were more effectively suppressed by 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) than aldicarb”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
1,3-D suppressed post-harvest soil populations of Meloidogyne incognita more effectively than aldicarb.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D)e0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- post-harvest soil populations of Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Direction
- suppressede0
- Comparator
- aldicarbe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“post-harvest soil populations of Meloidogyne incognita were more effectively suppressed by 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) than aldicarb”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Lint yield was positively related to 1,3-D rate in three tests.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- 1,3-De0
- Outcome
- lint yielde0
- Direction
- positivee0
- Value
- three testse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significant positive relationships existed between lint yield and rates of 1,3-D in three tests”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Lint yield was positively related to aldicarb rate in one test.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“only one significant positive relationship occurred between lint yield and aldicarb rates”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield increases with 1,3-D ranged from 16% to 124%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Yield increases ranged from 16% to 124%, depending on rate of 1,3-D”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield increased 35% in one aldicarb-treated test.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- aldicarb-treatede0
- Outcome
- Yielde0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 35%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Yield increases ranged from 16% to 124%, depending on rate of 1,3-D, and 35% in one aldicarb-treated test”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Post-harvest J2 soil density had a weak negative relation with aldicarb rate across four tests.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- aldicarbe0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Outcome
- post-harvest soil densities of second-stage juveniles (J2)e0
- Direction
- negativee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Only a weak negative relationship between post-harvest soil densities of second-stage juveniles (J2) and aldicarb rates was determined by combining data from the four tests”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Aldicarb did not suppress post-harvest J2 soil density in any test.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- Aldicarbe0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Outcome
- post-harvest J2 soil population densitiese0
- Direction
- failed to suppresse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Aldicarb failed to suppress post-harvest J2 soil population densities in any test”
e1“Meloidogyne incognita”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
All 1,3-D rates significantly reduced post-harvest M. incognita J2 density in two tests.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- 1,3-De0
- Interactor
- M. incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- post-harvest M. incognita J2 soil population densitiese0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“All rates of 1,3-D significantly reduced post-harvest M. incognita J2 soil population densities in two tests”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
1,3-D rate had a stronger negative correlation with nematode soil density than aldicarb.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- 1,3-De1
- Interactor
- M. incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae2pathogen - Outcome
- nematode soil densitiese0
- Direction
- stronger negative correlatione0
- Comparator
- aldicarbe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“provided a stronger negative correlation between nematode soil densities and rates than aldicarb when all test data were combined for each nematicide”
e1“1,3-D significantly reduced”
e2“M. incognita”
t0“Cotton”
The same questions in other papers
aldicarb · Meloidogyne incognita · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.