Paper · 2016 · Frontiers in Plant Science

A Modeling Approach to Quantify the Effects of Stomatal Behavior and Mesophyll Conductance on Leaf Water Use Efficiency

Dany P. Moualeu-Ngangue; Tsu-Wei Chen; Hartmut Stützel

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water use efficiency (WUE) is considered as a determinant of yield under stress and a component of crop drought resistance. Stomatal behavior regulates both transpiration rate and net assimilation and has been suggested to be crucial for improving crop WUE. In this work, a dynamic model was used to examine the impact of dynamic properties of stomata on WUE. The model includes sub-models of stomatal conductance dynamics, solute accumulation in the mesophyll, mesophyll water content, and water flow to the mesophyll. Using the instantaneous value of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, and transpiration rate were simulated using a biochemical model and Penman-Monteith equation, respectively. The model was parameterized for a cucumber leaf and model outputs were evaluated using climatic data. Our simulations revealed that WUE was higher on a cloudy than a sunny day. Fast stomatal reaction to light decreased WUE during the period of increasing light (e.g., in the morning) by up to 10.2% and increased WUE during the period of decreasing light (afternoon) by up to 6.25%. Sensitivity of daily WUE to stomatal parameters and mesophyll conductance to CO2 was tested for sunny and cloudy days. Increasing mesophyll conductance to CO2 was more likely to increase WUE for all climatic conditions (up to 5.5% on the sunny day) than modifications of stomatal reaction speed to light and maximum stomatal conductance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modeled water use efficiency was higher on cloudy than sunny days.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sunny daye0
Setting
cloudye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE was higher on a cloudy than a sunny day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–874 · show in text ↑
e1

“The model was parameterized for a cucumber leaf and model outputs were evaluated using climatic data. Our simulations revealed that WUE was higher on a cloudy than a sunny day. Fast stomatal reaction to light decreased WUE during the period of increasing light (e.g., in the morning) by up to 10.2% and increased WUE during the period of decreasing light (afternoon) by up to 6.25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Fast stomatal reaction to increasing light reduced modeled water use efficiency by up to 10.2%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Fast stomatal reaction to lighte0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
up to 10.2%e0
Qualifier
period of increasing lighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fast stomatal reaction to light decreased WUE during the period of increasing light (e.g., in the morning) by up to 10.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–997 · show in text ↑
e1

“The model was parameterized for a cucumber leaf and model outputs were evaluated using climatic data. Our simulations revealed that WUE was higher on a cloudy than a sunny day. Fast stomatal reaction to light decreased WUE during the period of increasing light (e.g., in the morning) by up to 10.2% and increased WUE during the period of decreasing light (afternoon) by up to 6.25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Fast stomatal reaction to decreasing light increased modeled water use efficiency by up to 6.25%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Fast stomatal reaction to lighte1
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 6.25%e0
Qualifier
period of decreasing lighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased WUE during the period of decreasing light (afternoon) by up to 6.25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1080 · show in text ↑
e1

“The model was parameterized for a cucumber leaf and model outputs were evaluated using climatic data. Our simulations revealed that WUE was higher on a cloudy than a sunny day. Fast stomatal reaction to light decreased WUE during the period of increasing light (e.g., in the morning) by up to 10.2% and increased WUE during the period of decreasing light (afternoon) by up to 6.25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mesophyll CO2 conductance was more likely to increase modeled water use efficiency under all climates than changing stomatal speed or maximum conductance.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Increasing mesophyll conductance to CO2e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
up to 5.5%e0
Qualifier
all climatic conditionse0
Comparator
modifications of stomatal reaction speed to light and maximum stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing mesophyll conductance to CO2 was more likely to increase WUE for all climatic conditions (up to 5.5% on the sunny day) than modifications of stomatal reaction speed to light and maximum stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1418 · show in text ↑
e1

“The model was parameterized for a cucumber leaf and model outputs were evaluated using climatic data. Our simulations revealed that WUE was higher on a cloudy than a sunny day. Fast stomatal reaction to light decreased WUE during the period of increasing light (e.g., in the morning) by up to 10.2% and increased WUE during the period of decreasing light (afternoon) by up to 6.25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–1080 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: water · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

light · physiology: water · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.