Paper · 2016 · Journal of Hill Agriculture

Response of mango malformation to stage and severity of pruning of shoot bearing malformed panicles

Satya Prakash; Manoj Kumar Singh; Arvind Kumar; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was formulated to examine the efficacy of different levels of pruning of shoot bearing malformed panicles on the floral malformation in ‘Dashehari ’mango at two distinct stages of panicle emergence. Pruning of newly emerged panicles has pronounced effect in reducing the incidence of malformation. Delay in pruning of fully emerged panicles gave less satisfactory results. Among shoot pruning treatments applied at different stages of panicle emergence, malformation was significantly most suppressed with 20 cm shoot pruning applied at early stage of newly emerged panicle followed by 25 cm shoot pruning and 15 cm shoot pruning. Light pruning treatments (5 cm) applied to trees at both the stages did not affect malformation significantly and were at par with unpruned trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning newly emerged panicles reduced malformation incidence.

Treatment
Pruning of newly emerged paniclese0
Outcome
incidence of malformatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning of newly emerged panicles has pronounced effect in reducing the incidence of malformation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed pruning of fully emerged panicles gave less satisfactory control.

Treatment
pruning of fully emerged paniclese0
Outcome
less satisfactory resultse0
Direction
less satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delay in pruning of fully emerged panicles gave less satisfactory results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early 20 cm shoot pruning suppressed malformation most significantly.

Treatment
20 cm shoot pruning applied at early stage of newly emerged paniclee0
Outcome
malformatione0
Direction
most suppressede0
Comparator
25 cm shoot pruning and 15 cm shoot pruninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“malformation was significantly most suppressed with 20 cm shoot pruning applied at early stage of newly emerged panicle followed by 25 cm shoot pruning and 15 cm shoot pruning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five-centimeter pruning at either stage did not significantly change malformation relative to unpruned trees.

Treatment
Light pruning treatments (5 cm)e0
Outcome
malformatione0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
unpruned treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light pruning treatments (5 cm) applied to trees at both the stages did not affect malformation significantly and were at par with unpruned trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17 · show in text ↑

pruning · crop injury · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.