Paper · 1998 · Weed Technology

Biologically Effective Dose and Selectivity of RPA 201772 for Preemergence Weed Control in Corn (Zea mays)

Stevan Z. Knezevic; Peter H. Sikkema; Francois Tardif; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1996 and 1997 at three locations throughout southern Ontario with the objective of developing dose-response curves of RPA 201772 for weed control and crop tolerance in corn. The biologically effective doses required to control redroot pigweed, velvetleaf, and wild mustard were 100, 90, and 80 g/ha, respectively. Yellow foxtail was controlled with 100 to 120 g/ha, while rates for common lambsquarters varied from 60 to 130 g/ha, depending on the year and location. Wild buckwheat control was poor (> 30%) at all of the doses tested. RPA 201772 did not reduce corn grain yield; however, temporary crop injury was evident on coarse sandy soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redroot pigweed control required 100 g/ha RPA 201772.

Treatment
RPA 201772t0
Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
control redroot pigweede0
Direction
controle0
Value
100e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“biologically effective doses required to control redroot pigweed, velvetleaf, and wild mustard were 100, 90, and 80 g/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–344 · show in text ↑
t0

“RPA 201772”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvetleaf control required 90 g/ha RPA 201772.

Treatment
RPA 201772t0
Interactor
velvetleafAbutilon theophrastie0weed
Outcome
control redroot pigweed, velvetleafe0
Direction
controle0
Value
90e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abutilon theophrasti
Abutilon theophrasti · InteractorI.Sáček, senior · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biologically effective doses required to control redroot pigweed, velvetleaf, and wild mustard were 100, 90, and 80 g/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–344 · show in text ↑
t0

“RPA 201772”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild mustard control required 80 g/ha RPA 201772.

Treatment
RPA 201772t0
Interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
control redroot pigweed, velvetleaf, and wild mustarde0
Direction
controle0
Value
80 g/hae0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“biologically effective doses required to control redroot pigweed, velvetleaf, and wild mustard were 100, 90, and 80 g/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–344 · show in text ↑
t0

“RPA 201772”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow foxtail was controlled at 100 to 120 g/ha.

Treatment
100 to 120 g/hae0
Interactor
Yellow foxtailSetaria pumilae0weed
Outcome
Yellow foxtaile0
Direction
controllede0
Value
100 to 120 g/hae0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria pumila
Setaria pumila · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow foxtail was controlled with 100 to 120 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common lambsquarters control rates varied from 60 to 130 g/ha by year and location.

Treatment
60 to 130 g/hae0
Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
common lambsquarterse0
Direction
variede0
Value
60 to 130 g/hae0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rates for common lambsquarters varied from 60 to 130 g/ha, depending on the year and location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild buckwheat control was poor at all tested doses.

Treatment
doses testede0
Interactor
Wild buckwheatFallopia convolvuluse0weed
Outcome
Wild buckwheat controle0
Direction
poore0
Value
> 30%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fallopia convolvulus
Fallopia convolvulus · InteractorAung · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wild buckwheat control was poor (> 30%) at all of the doses tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RPA 201772 did not reduce corn grain yield.

Treatment
RPA 201772e0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RPA 201772 did not reduce corn grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RPA 201772 caused temporary corn injury on coarse sandy soils.

Treatment
RPA 201772e0
Outcome
crop injurye0
Direction
evidente0
Setting
coarse sandy soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RPA 201772 did not reduce corn grain yield; however, temporary crop injury was evident on coarse sandy soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–675 · show in text ↑

isoxaflutole · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

isoxaflutole · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

isoxaflutole · Abutilon theophrasti · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

isoxaflutole · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

15 papers: 0 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.