Paper · 2005 · PubMed

[Interspecific association between understory species in a southern highland plantation].

Lile Hu; Boqian Yan; Qijing Liu; et al.

14
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Based upon 2 x 2 contingency table, chi2 test and association coefficient were used to determine the interspecific association between understory species in a southern highland plantation, and to analyze the restoration degree and the stability of southern highland vegetations originated from plantation. The Qianyanzhou in Taihe County of Jiangxi Province, a typical sample of southern highland plantation, was chosen to make the study. The results showed that both in shrub layer and in herb layer, species pair with chi2 reaching significant level (P <0.05) was few in number. In shrub layer, 12 species pairs' association was highly significant (P < 0.01), 19 pairs' was significant (P < 0.05), and other 200 pairs' was nonsignificant, while in herb layer, 11 pairs' was highly significant, 11 pairs' was significant and other 83 pairs' was nonsignificant. According to interspecific association and correlation, shrub layer was divided into two species groups: Group I . Adinandra bockiana, Syzygiumn grijsii, Vaccinium bracteatunm, Ilex aculeolata, Smilax ferox, Eurya muricata and Group II . Lespedeza davidii, Serissa serissoides, Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia. Many species in Group I had a significantly negative association with the species in Group II, and dominant species always played a key role in the relationships among species. The three dominant species in herb layer, Wooduardia japonica, Dryopteris atrata and Adiantun flabellulaturn, had a highly significant positive correlation between each other, and moreover, had a significant or highly significant positive association with many other herbaceous species. Similarily, dominant species in shrub layer played a key role on the interspecific association in the two species groups. The ratios of positive and negative association indicating the species compositions of the two layers were fluctuating, which was 125/106 in shrub layer and 42/63 in herb layer. Several shortcomings of interspecific association method were pointed out, with some proposals put forward.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Few species pairs in either shrub or herb layer reached significant chi-square association.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
species pair with chi2 reaching significant levele0
Setting
shrub layer and in herb layere0

Verbatim

e0

“both in shrub layer and in herb layer, species pair with chi2 reaching significant level (P <0.05) was few in number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–579 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the shrub layer, 12 pairs had highly significant association.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
species pairs' associatione0
Value
12e0
Setting
shrub layere0

Verbatim

e0

“In shrub layer, 12 species pairs' association was highly significant (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–660 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the shrub layer, 19 pairs had significant association.

Taxon
understory speciest0
Outcome
pairs'e0
Value
19e0

Verbatim

e0

“19 pairs' was significant (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“understory species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the shrub layer, 200 pairs had nonsignificant association.

Taxon
understory speciest0
Outcome
pairs'e0
Value
200e0

Verbatim

e0

“other 200 pairs' was nonsignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“understory species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the herb layer, 11 pairs had highly significant association.

Taxon
understory speciest0
Outcome
pairs'e0
Value
11e0
Setting
herb layere0

Verbatim

e0

“in herb layer, 11 pairs' was highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“understory species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the herb layer, 11 pairs had significant association.

Taxon
understory speciest0
Outcome
pairs'e0
Value
11e0

Verbatim

e0

“11 pairs' was significant and other 83 pairs' was nonsignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“understory species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the herb layer, 83 pairs had nonsignificant association.

Taxon
understory speciest0
Outcome
pairs'e0
Value
83e0

Verbatim

e0

“other 83 pairs' was nonsignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“understory species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shrub species were divided into two groups by association and correlation.

Taxon
Adinandra bockianaAdinandra bockianae0
Outcome
two species groupse0
Setting
shrub layere0

Verbatim

e0

“shrub layer was divided into two species groups: Group I . Adinandra bockiana, Syzygiumn grijsii, Vaccinium bracteatunm, Ilex aculeolata, Smilax ferox, Eurya muricata and Group II . Lespedeza davidii, Serissa serissoides, Vitex negundo var. cannabifolia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1171 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Many species in shrub group I were negatively associated with species in group II.

Taxon
species in Group Ie0
Outcome
association with the species in Group IIe0
Direction
negativee0
Comparator
species in Group IIe0

Verbatim

e0

“Many species in Group I had a significantly negative association with the species in Group II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1266 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominant shrub species played a key role in interspecific relationships.

Taxon
dominant speciese0
Outcome
relationships among speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“dominant species always played a key role in the relationships among species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1348 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three dominant herb species had highly significant positive correlations with each other.

Taxon
Wooduardia japonicae0
Outcome
correlation between each othere0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
Dryopteris atrata and Adiantun flabellulaturne0

Verbatim

e0

“Wooduardia japonica, Dryopteris atrata and Adiantun flabellulaturn, had a highly significant positive correlation between each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1524 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The dominant herb species had significant or highly significant positive associations with many other herbaceous species.

Taxon
Wooduardia japonicae0
Outcome
association with many other herbaceous speciese0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
other herbaceous speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“The three dominant species in herb layer, Wooduardia japonica, Dryopteris atrata and Adiantun flabellulaturn, had a highly significant positive correlation between each other, and moreover, had a significant or highly significant positive association with many other herbaceous species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“understory species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shrub layer had a positive to negative association ratio of 125/106.

Taxon
understory speciest0
Outcome
125/106 in shrub layere0
Value
125/106e0
Setting
shrub layere0

Verbatim

e0

“125/106 in shrub layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–1911 · show in text ↑
t0

“understory species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herb layer had a positive to negative association ratio of 42/63.

Taxon
understory speciest0
Outcome
42/63 in herb layere0
Value
42/63e0
Setting
herb layere0

Verbatim

e0

“42/63 in herb layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–1935 · show in text ↑
t0

“understory species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–53 · show in text ↑